Weird California sighting

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: StargateSG7

.....ok. I doubt your estimate on distance. Ive watched the exact same thing plus and they were a good distance away playing peak a boo behind a mountain range. The objects in that video are also likeky at least a mile or much more away.

The only thing thats spoiled is your sense of distance. I dont care what wackadoodle frames per second mumbo jumbo youre babbling about.

====

It's basic trigometry:

How many pixels does the object move up or down
and left or right in one second. If I know the FRAME
rate per second I can find speed/velocity pretty
accurately by converting pixels per frame to
feet per second and then miles per hour!

Distance and size is based upon 720 by 486
(the videos have Panasonic, Sony or JVC-burned
timecode so I know the approximate SDTV
(analog or digital Standard Definition TV)
resolution.

From there I also know the approximate distance
because that video is I think from Bob Lazar and/or
John Lear so I know it's approximate location (near
or on the mailbox road away from the cammo dudes)
(3km to 5km away from the peak) because the lens
is also zoomed in, I know the aproximate zoom
capabilities of the Sony, Panasonic and JVC
cameras available during that time period
which means I can determine field of view
and number of pixels per degree and then
width and height per pixel in feet.

So I say the math tells me it's less than 100 MPH
and 25 to 40 feet across. It MIGHT be as large
as 60 to 80 feet across and as fast as 150 MPH
but that depends upon the zoom ratio of the lens.

It's just math and basic trigonometry!

Nothing Mumbo Jumbo about it at all !!!

It's just Pure Science with an acceptable range of error!

a reply to: StargateSG7

So you got a 25 -80 foot drone that can manuever like that....ok

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: StargateSG7

So you got a 25 -80 foot drone that can manuever like that....ok

====

Our biggest camera drone (as of august 2016) has
32 4K cameras on it and weighs in at 30,000+ lbs
plus extra fuel so getting near 50,000 lbs!

Add in the four gymballed turbo-fans and
YUP i'd say it can match that performance.
It can even flip upside down like those
Parrot drones --- What 50,000 lbs aircraft
do you know can flip on it's axis while
hovering?!

Our high-speed drone aircraft is a little more
advanced because it's four cameras
are 10,000 FPS 4k's (4096x2160p)

I will just say it can go higher than 100,000 feet....!!!!

Both drones can be set to fully autonomous
with gyroscopic/inertial guidance and pure
vision recognition so as to avoid ITAR issues
when using anything GPS eqipped at that
height and speed.

I can also remotely pilot them via
a medium bandwidth satellite video
and control commands uplink/downlink.
Everything is fully C4SIR integrated!

The parent company has SERIOUS MONEY
and TECHNICAL ABILITY in terms of computers,
robotics and drone technology!

To put it mildly, on the DRONE SIDE OF THINGS
we pretty much blow LMCO, Raytheon, Northrup,
General Atomics and Boeing right out of the water!

Their drones can't track 65,000 objects per second. OURS CAN!
Their drones don't have up to 32 4K cameras on them. OURS DO!
Their 50,000 lbs drones can't flip on their axis while hovering. THIS ONE DOES!
And their drones don't use full vision recognition for flight control and terrain
avoidance and object anti-collision. OH YEAH BABEEEEEE !!!!

The only thing ours DOESN'T HAVE is electro-magneto-plasmadynamic
field effects drive for ultimate maneuverability and speed .....BUT....we're working on that!

a reply to: StargateSG7
Not quite what you are describing, but this happened 5ish years ago
My ex roommate had an uncle who works for an aerospace co., that i have never heard of, based in NM.
He sent her an Email, with an attached photo of a "drone" they were working on, and it is something i dont recognize and have never seen since. It was fairly large, i would say in the 50-80' wingspan range . The photo was of it taking off in flight testing.
Somewhat deltaish wing, embedded jet engines, two, they were leaving a slight smoke trail, intakes on the upper wing surface.
The weird thing is that, i was there when she opened the photo, she showed it to me and said "hey look what my uncle is working on", i checked it out and it was very intersting, but then when i asked her to see it agian a few days later the picture was random code gibberish, a self distructing pic so to speak.
It wasnt some glorified RC plane, but a well designed project that some finacial weight behind it.
i have always wondered about it.

originally posted by: punkinworks10
a reply to: StargateSG7
Not quite what you are describing, but this happened 5ish years ago
My ex roommate had an uncle who works for an aerospace co., that i have never heard of, based in NM.
He sent her an Email, with an attached photo of a "drone" they were working on, and it is something i dont recognize and have never seen since. It was fairly large, i would say in the 50-80' wingspan range . The photo was of it taking off in flight testing.
Somewhat deltaish wing, embedded jet engines, two, they were leaving a slight smoke trail, intakes on the upper wing surface.
The weird thing is that, i was there when she opened the photo, she showed it to me and said "hey look what my uncle is working on", i checked it out and it was very intersting, but then when i asked her to see it agian a few days later the picture was random code gibberish, a self distructing pic so to speak.
It wasnt some glorified RC plane, but a well designed project that some finacial weight behind it.
i have always wondered about it.

My guess an RQ series or a newer version of something
like a Global Hawk is my guess. If it's New Mexico, then
probably Scaled Composites or Northrup Grumman with
a configuration somewhere along the lines of the Proteus:

Proteus:
en.wikipedia.org...

or maybe even a blended wing body like this:
upload.wikimedia.org...


Our drones are not affiliated with any specific programme
but are internal to the company for specific internal research.
On a technical basis, you could say we are a Canadian version
of a technological blend between Boston Dynamics, Scaled Composites,
NVIDIA and Panavision...very high tech and computer/aerospace/vision systems heavy!!!!
We ARE space capable..... ;-) :-)

a reply to: StargateSG7

Our drones are not affiliated with any specific programme
but are internal to the company for specific internal research.
On a technical basis, you could say we are a Canadian version
of a technological blend between Boston Dynamics, Scaled Composites,
NVIDIA and Panavision...very high tech and computer/aerospace/vision systems heavy!!!!
We ARE space capable..... ;-) :-)

Maths & Trig is easy (even dumb grunts like me can do it)

Now lets see some evidence of your companies work, pics, video, even sanitised working drawings.

As for space capable, that claim is so varied.. a UK company can be claimed to be space capable, it sent a SBC with camera into "space" and got it back using just a balloon!

Just so you know stargate that the things im refering to do a whole lot more than whats in that video link i posted. Like wink out here split second later it winks in over there.

originally posted by: TheBogmonster

a reply to: StargateSG7

Our drones are not affiliated with any specific programme
but are internal to the company for specific internal research.
On a technical basis, you could say we are a Canadian version
of a technological blend between Boston Dynamics, Scaled Composites,
NVIDIA and Panavision...very high tech and computer/aerospace/vision systems heavy!!!!
We ARE space capable..... ;-) :-)

Maths & Trig is easy (even dumb grunts like me can do it)

Now lets see some evidence of your companies work, pics, video, even sanitised working drawings.

As for space capable, that claim is so varied.. a UK company can be claimed to be space capable, it sent a SBC with camera into "space" and got it back using just a balloon!

===

I would say to your askance for proof is that the answer is NO!

Just because we are not afilliated with a specific aerospace
corporation or military program, does not mean we don't have
ties to certain players. We have fingers in ALMOST EVERYWHERE!

Certain people on this forum ALREADY WORK WITH OUR GEAR,
you just don't recognize or know it conclusively..... :-) ;-) :-)

...

:-) :-) ;-)

...

By NEAR-SPACE CAPABLE we mean we have planforms that
can fly up to 100 km (60 miles - aka the Karman Line) using
a combined airbreathing engine for lower atmosphere and
high-atmosphere onboard oxidiser-based motor technology.

By FULLY SPACE-CAPABLE, we mean we have planforms
that are self-propelled and have on-board liquid fuel
(H2/LOX) that can ORBIT THE EARTH at distance
EXCEEDING 800 KM (500 miles - aka Thermopause)
which would allow us to reach the ISS and return
to a fixed position and then land using a wheeled
configuration under their own power!

...that's all I can say for now....

Although YOU CAN SEE my personally-built drone designs....
which I have been working on for YEARS as I get access to
the 3D EBM printers on certain days. The company thankfully
tolerates my 3D printed lifting body drone obsesssion..... :-)

a reply to: StargateSG7

Yeah mate,

So you guys have leapfrogged everyone.

Amazing that, even after asking a few questions of some well connected friends in my country and yours, seems your space capable claim is nothing more than a claim.

Only two current platforms can do what you claim and neither are in private hands.

Nice dreaming though mate. keep tapping that keyboard ;-)

originally posted by: TheBogmonster
a reply to: StargateSG7

Yeah mate,

So you guys have leapfrogged everyone.

Amazing that, even after asking a few questions of some well connected friends in my country and yours, seems your space capable claim is nothing more than a claim.

Only two current platforms can do what you claim and neither are in private hands.

Nice dreaming though mate. keep tapping that keyboard ;-)

====

And if you had dug a little further and asked a few more questions
of your "Friends", you would have gotten the more indicative response of:

"YES! It's an online claim, but it can't be outright dismissed from that party!"

...like I wrote earlier. I will say what I say
and give you the hint that the PROOF is
in the PUDDING !!!!

;-) :-) ;-)

P.S. There are MORE THAN TEN platforms that can do
what I say and we have ONLY TWO of them......!!!!!!!!!!
....so I suggest you ask a few more questions and dig
a little deeper and see how far the rabbit hole leads you down!


---

P.S.2 -- I'm but one of many people in this concern.
most of them have brains and technical skills
WAAAAAY BEYOND MINE !!!!!

So when I say WE, I mean the people who specifically
DESIGN, BUILD and FLY these systems are the ones
who deserve credit. I just did the Vision Recognition
and parts of the Flight Control Systems.

SO YES!!! We have space-capable platforms.
I did NOT personally build or fly them...THEY DID!

a reply to: StargateSG7

Mate I love you and your posts. Unlike others, I take them with a grain of salt but enjoy them for what they are - and I gotta tell you I really don't care whether they are true or not. I love the what if's and if anything you say is even remotely true than all power to you and I am truly envious!!

However (there is always a however), sometimes you gotta put up or shut up! Please don't take offence as this is not only directed at you! A subtle hint here and a wink there always goes a long way to helping anyone out making the claims that are made here! Every now and again you and other posters here need to show your hand's or you will always be accused of bluffing.

BTW lived in Canada for 14 years, West coast is the Best coast and will be back over there in 2017 for a few weeks to tidy up a few things.

Don't get me wrong - love the banter!

originally posted by: Gurumuka
a reply to: StargateSG7

Mate I love you and your posts. Unlike others, I take them with a grain of salt but enjoy them for what they are - and I gotta tell you I really don't care whether they are true or not. I love the what if's and if anything you say is even remotely true than all power to you and I am truly envious!!

However (there is always a however), sometimes you gotta put up or shut up! Please don't take offence as this is not only directed at you! A subtle hint here and a wink there always goes a long way to helping anyone out making the claims that are made here! Every now and again you and other posters here need to show your hand's or you will always be accused of bluffing.

BTW lived in Canada for 14 years, West coast is the Best coast and will be back over there in 2017 for a few weeks to tidy up a few things.

Don't get me wrong - love the banter!

You'll see the proof soon enough....!!!!

We're just working out a few kinks on some things
but you'll see it in all it's 4K 60 fps Youtube glory
in just a little while....let's just say it's a surprise. ;-) ;-)

It will DEFINITELY SHOCK a few people at
NASA, ESA, CSA, DIA, NRO, NSA and what
the heck the CIA, CNSA and Roscosmos!

Let's ALSO just say, it has some abilities
and technology DEFINTELY NOT AVAILABLE
to those parties.....!!!! ;-) :-) ;-)

---

P.S. Please Note: This IS the Internet!

I can say ANYTHING I WANT because I am a Keyboard Kat
where my job is working all day at an East Van warehouse
shipping VHS XXX videos to 3rd world countries and trolling
the internet all night....OR MAYBE NOT!

Don't believe what you see and hear
until you've got REAL WORLD PROOF !!!!!

....

Then again....I really just might have that now 1.4 PetaFLOP
S9150 GPU cluster, 120 Kilowatt Railgun, Two high-manueverability
drones with my 65000+ objects-per-second vision recognition systems,
and a friend with a 10 TeraHertz fully opto-electronic 119 ExaFLOP
Ultracomputer running TEN 200+ IQ functional Whole Brain Emulations
working on designing M-branes-hopping warp drive designs 24/7/365,
and of course my designs for a carbon-composite, titanium armoured
T800 Terminator-like fully-autonomous droid I've been working on for years!

Then again...it could all be just plain old Internet B.S. ---- YOU DECIDE!

Ooops !!!! One of my VHS duplicators just ate some more tapes!
Need to see what's up! Soooooo.....I must go back and fix taht mess
of chewed-up plastic ribbon because those 3rd world horned toads
can't be kept waiting for that all that 25 fps, 352 by 320 pixel
poorly-acted XXX video can they!!!

Hasta La Vista Babeeeeee !!!!!!

a reply to: StargateSG7

OH! One more thing!

I might ALSO have once worked for the CIA
as a clandestine foreign civilian-contracted
hunter-killer team in various foreign hell-holes
doing prejudicial black-bag jobs AND later for
the NSA and the DIA as a foreign contractor doing
cyberwarfare and disinformation campaigns and
also writing StuxNet-like virii that hunt down,
infiltrate and delete sensitive information from
goobal networks...OR MAYBE NOT !!!

P.S. XXX

I LIKE jumping out the back of C130's
and stuffing my oversized self into the
back seat of an F/A-18F/G to do a night
run into Iraq and then drive for three days
in a Tactical Light Vehicle into Northern Afghanistan!

ha aha ha ha Do you REALLY believe all that !!!!

P.S. X7 --- I use a P90 rather than the
M4 as my PDW cuz sand doesn't get into it so much!

My long range rifle is an M107 Barrett --- 35 lbs is not too bad to carry!

.... HA HA HA HA HA HA !!!!!! --- I still live in Mom's Basement!!!!!

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: StargateSG7

Do you still get mad when your mom burns your hot pockets and interrupts your computer programming time to ask why your dirty socks are so stiff and crusty that she can crack them in half everytime she tries to do your laundry or are you over that?

===

I'm still not over that...!!! Some of my socks are
OVER 20 YEARS old and so stiff and crusty, that
I now use them as coffee table legs cuz my old
coffee legs busted from the all those left-over
pizza boxes, my collection of 1990's era playboy magz,
and my HUGE Sci-Fi/Fanstasy comic book collection
which I should have boxed so I could have saved
them in pristine condition for auction so I wouldn't
have to live in Mom's basement anymore!

C'est La Vie! Oh Well !!!!

Now I Gotta clear a tape jam
in the VHS duplicators YET AGAIN !!!!

Ya know I should just quit and go work at
McDonalds so I can earn enough to actually
MOVE OUT of Mom's basement after all these decades!
She keeps screaming at me to finally go get my driver's
licence and go find a girlfriend! --- YECH! I won't settle
for ANY BABE that isn't like my favorite June 1998
Playboy centre-fold...SHE'S SOOOO HOT!

===

Sooooo......How about that Alcubierre Drive that's
all the rage now. Our company's been working on it for years
BUT they finally contracted out to my 119 ExaFLOP Ultracomputer
friend on computing whether it's possible to harness the energy
created by virtual particle annihilations caused my M-branes
pertubations to expand a bubble in-between those M-branes
so that waaaay-beyond Lightspeed can be attained.

www.andersoninstitute.com...

We found differential thermals within an area
in the Local Void about 20,000 lightyears outside
of the MCG+01-02-015 Dwarf Galaxy which is
all alone in the vast Local Void empty space.
(about 75 million light years away from Earth!)

Local Void information:
en.wikipedia.org...

The IR differential between the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation
and a relatively small area out of the MCG+01-02-015 Dwarf Galaxy
is consistent with a Dyson Shell that is the Size of the Orbit
between the Sun and Saturn so the inner area is MANY
MANY TENS OF QUADRILLIONS of Square Miles of
Living space and there SEEMS to be gravitational
lensing occurring such that we estimate it's gravity
on the surface would be about 1.4 G's so I would be
HABITABLE by Humans. ...SOOOOOO.....we need
to get on with that M-branes Drive research
and get over to that newly found Dyson Shell !!!!!

Dyson Shell or Dyson Sphere FAQ:
www.aleph.se...

and

Configurations and Interior views:
www.popularmechanics.com...


The Dyson Sphere will have moved around in those 75 millions years
since the IR and Gravitational Lensing perturbations first started
out from that Local Void Darwf Galaxy....BUT.... based upon some
Orbital Mechanics calculations and material decay estimations,
it should STILL EXIST even AFTER all these millions of years!

a reply to: StargateSG7

Nooooo stargate. Those socks arent crusty cause their old. Your mom just throws them away now when she finds them like that. Then she goes out and buys you new ones but in less than 24 hours the whole set comes back stiffer than a starched shirt.

As for the rest of your babble.

M brane theory. More like brane idea. An untestable hypothesis. Except for a few diehards, scientists are beggining to abandon it.

Albacrurrie (sp) drive is stupid.

And you want to build a drive based on it to find a dyson sphere.

Screw trying to find a dyson sphere. You need to find a dyson vacuum and clean that expanding chettos dust and human protien stain on the carpet under your computer chair.

And for gods sake stop terrorizing those socks and miss 1998.

originally posted by: StargateSG7
a reply to: StargateSG7

OH! One more thing!

I might ALSO have once worked for the CIA
as a clandestine foreign civilian-contracted
hunter-killer team in various foreign hell-holes
doing prejudicial black-bag jobs AND later for
the NSA and the DIA as a foreign contractor doing
cyberwarfare and disinformation campaigns and
also writing StuxNet-like virii that hunt down,
infiltrate and delete sensitive information from
goobal networks...OR MAYBE NOT !!!

P.S. XXX

I LIKE jumping out the back of C130's
and stuffing my oversized self into the
back seat of an F/A-18F/G to do a night
run into Iraq and then drive for three days
in a Tactical Light Vehicle into Northern Afghanistan!

ha aha ha ha Do you REALLY believe all that !!!!

P.S. X7 --- I use a P90 rather than the
M4 as my PDW cuz sand doesn't get into it so much!

My long range rifle is an M107 Barrett --- 35 lbs is not too bad to carry!

.... HA HA HA HA HA HA !!!!!! --- I still live in Mom's Basement!!!!!

cool i need a job the cia would be awesome to work for.

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: StargateSG7

Nooooo stargate. Those socks arent crusty cause their old. Your mom just throws them away now when she finds them like that. Then she goes out and buys you new ones but in less than 24 hours the whole set comes back stiffer than a starched shirt.

As for the rest of your babble.

M brane theory. More like brane idea. An untestable hypothesis. Except for a few diehards, scientists are beggining to abandon it.

Albacrurrie (sp) drive is stupid.

And you want to build a drive based on it to find a dyson sphere.

Screw trying to find a dyson sphere. You need to find a dyson vacuum and clean that expanding chettos dust and human protien stain on the carpet under your computer chair.

And for gods sake stop terrorizing those socks and miss 1998.

I dunno about M-branes theory .... One of our Engineers is a working
Astrophysicist with a Doctoral from the University of Cambridge.
He sees certain merits of a few of the six current theories espoused
especially after he explained to me that I should think of "Other Dimensions"
away from a physical construct and over to the computer science construct
of multi-dimensional data arrays where data is grouped or allocated as a
single size but contains sub-divisions (or LINES of organization) that
work similar to rooms and hallways. The house is a single size but
it can be subdivided into rooms that contain "Storage Material"
of similar properties and have "Hallways" and "Stairwells" that
can shortcut between many rooms and even have walkways
WITHIN individual "rooms" that are also shortcuts to individual
"Shelves" and "Cabinets" of 3D-Space-Time (aka humans
and the world they live in).

It's really no different than General Relativity or
Superstring Theory as they both describe the
same "house" but merely differ in how they
describe the sub-division of said house
into pre-defined "Rooms" and "Hallways"
of a given size and hallway length/direction.

He has no issue with M-branes theory, merely some
questions as to HOW to access the hallways/stairwells
BETWEEN rooms and cabinet/shelves!

THAT IS WHAT HE IS INTERESTED IN !!!!

So touche !!! I kind have to defer to the Doctor from Cambridge!

---

Anyways we're NOT finding an Alcubierre drive
which is basically just an MHD drive for space!

We're finding a method to create and expand a super-cavitation-like
bubble so we can enter the piping/cableways that lies inside
the the walls of this "House" (aka Universe) and move/drive from
Room-to-Room as we see fit and then re-entire each room
via the light sockets/water faucets, re-emerging near a
specific cabinet or shelf at WAAAY faster than lightspeed!

At 119 ExaFLOPS and a Neural Net Whole Brain Emulation software,
the process is coming along nicely enough! Humans CANNOT search
and organize the quadrillions of permutations of sub-atomic dynamics
simulations to find the specific macro-scale processes and effects
that will ALLOW US HUMANS to dig into the walls and enter that
super-light speed highway!

All is very interesting but is it possible to come back to the California sighting and the Green legend ?

a reply to: darksidius

Yeah sure.

Wakefield laser accelerators and the color green. ....think about it!

Hes talking about using halls to bypass a room. Im saying use Halls to bypass something too!