It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
It is an interesting situation shared how accurate unsure? @ times it was thought up that DNA extractions would be needed to generate-clone an enhanced human/? group force that could go out there into the cosmos biologically designed for cosmic inhabitance for whatever reasons... That are not humans native to EA*RTH but genetically from here or human.
originally posted by: eriktheawful
Seems a bit far away. Why not on one of Jupiter's moons? Or the far side of the moon?
A
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
It is an interesting situation shared how accurate unsure? @ times it was thought up that DNA extractions would be needed to generate-clone an enhanced human/? group force that could go out there into the cosmos biologically designed for cosmic inhabitance for whatever reasons... That are not humans native to EA*RTH but genetically from here or human.
Erm say again?
originally posted by: MysterX
a reply to: butcherguy
But what about his account, as fantastical as it might at first seem, do you find the most hard to believe?
Is it the physicality of technologically achieving it? Or is it that you don't or cannot believe a secret of such magnitude could be kept for such a long time?
What aspects cause you to immediately jump to the conclusion he is bonkers?
In all honesty, he MAY be an attention seeking loony, he's Human, so of course that possibility is always going to be present, but why would you automatically assume he is mad?
Is it simply because he gives an account that is so beyond out of the ordinary for most of us?
I'm genuinely interested in why anyone, presumably not psychiatrically trained (are you?) in the absence of any real evidence for or against his account, would assume the worst? And being realistic, IF his account is remotely accurate, the evidence is going to be thin on the ground unless others from this unit or force also come forwards and testify to their experiences.
It's not like you get any points or prizes for being the first to rubbish someones account of the fantastic, just as you don't get any for being the last.
How would you explain the gasoline costs in the US are very high right now, when the supply is overabundant?
Scarcity of water should make a desert thrive with vegetable growth then.
It is based on supply and demand
a bit of thread derailment...
You your self stated that "marketing works". And do you feel the marketing tells you what you need...or what they need to sell to keep the busyness running ?
A good product that everybody wants...needs very little marketing if any. Most of what they sell you is useless garbage that you don't need in the first place. So how is that supply and demand...? Supply sure...but demand ?
Well, I don't buy bottled water.
The goal of marketing is to convince you that you need a product, even though you don't.... obviously to support sales in their business. But it does work. Just because I can see through their scam to sell me an inferior product that I already have ready access from my kitchen tap, doesn't mean that a whole lot of people won't be fooled into buying.
1
The demand is certainly there, otherwise the product would not be manufactured.
I'm genuinely interested in why anyone, presumably not psychiatrically trained (are you?) in the absence of any real evidence for or against his account, would assume the worst?
originally posted by: Brotherman
a reply to: eriktheawful
where did this dick head get acclimated to space, even on earth marines will spend a week or two in kuwait before rolling into Iraq one bullet purpose, get used to the desert before that was 2 months in mojave viper in death valley basically where was his PT going on at the effin moon gym, GTFO
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
a reply to: Char-Lee
Maybe some of those drones and remote craft were secret in 1951, but many of the drones and other remote-controlled planes were publicly-available knowledge since the 1950s. Some of these were target drones, and some were used for reconnaissance.
I know at least some of the craft on that chart had been (and still are) displayed in Aircraft museums for decades. The idea of using unmanned drones is not THAT new, and it wasn't really a big secret even in the 1960s and 1970s. Sometimes they had pre-programmed flight plans, and sometimes they were remote-controlled.
originally posted by: JIMC5499
This doesn't seem so strange compared to some of the other things that I've been asked to believe on ATS. Nano-thermite, micro nukes, holographic airplanes............etc. I'm inclined to give him the shadow of a doubt.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: interupt42
If only the ATS discovered whistle blowers would work in Hollywood or the scifi channel we might actually get some pretty decent movies.
Yes, his story has the likes of 'Sharknado' and 'Mansquito' beaten soundly.
He really should submit a screenplay to the SciFi Channel.
Most of these tales aren't true. I'd say the bulk of them are people who want 15 minutes of fame. What a better way to do that then to concoct a story and stick to it until your death? It won't bother someone who has no shame about lying.
But it won't satisfy people who want solid evidence, like scientists. It's kind of like the existence of God. It's a possibility, but where's the solid evidence?
originally posted by: gort51
originally posted by: Char-Lee
a reply to: butcherguy
You have to start wondering, where there is smoke...
We had the Navy Pilot that came forward with pretty much the same story years ago. Anyone have it my copy is gone it seems. He claimed he had beening flying in space on missions for years and had seen lighted cities on planets to far to reach.Many many others.
Secret Space Program Whistle blower Capt. Mark Richards Project Camelot
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I think this is interesing from Zaron's thread in 2009
Efforts to conquer space began in earnest in the early 1960s when the first U.S. manned spacecraft Freedom 7 was successfully launched and recovered May 5, 1961. Both Astronaut Alan Shepard and the Freedom 7 were flown safely by helicopter to the deck of the USS Lake Champlain within 11 minutes of landing. With that successful recovery, President John F. Kennedy challenged the nation to land men on the moon and return them safely to earth before 1970.
Space Program drives Navy to reorganization. In answer to the challenge, NASA launched the Apollo Space Program. It soon became apparent that supporting the space program would be a significant priority for the Navy. Indeed, support of the space program and the launching of its own satellite navigation systems drove a number of organizational changes within the Navy. Along with some existing challenges the Navy had been battling for some time.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I think these are the ones you are looking for
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
enjoy.