Watch Trey Gowdy’s Powerful Speech in Congress That Could Be a Defining Moment for America.

a reply to: AngryCymraeg

Uhhhhhh . . . perhaps you could increase your background reading about 1,000% . . . those facts are in the public domain about him.

The GOP has been under the control of the globalist oligarchy about as long as the clueless communists, liberals, regressives et al have.

The following are collected mostly in the first link [a few may be in one or more of the latter links], . . . in the controllers' own words from a diversity of sources:

twoday.net...

www.crossroad.to...

www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com...


twga...

. . .

29."The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self createdscreen....At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties." New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, 1922
.

30."From the days of Sparticus, Wieskhopf, Karl Marx, Trotsky, Rosa Luxemberg, and Emma Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the tragedy of the French revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire." Winston Churchill, stated to the London Press, in l922.

. . .

33."For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn't. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advanced by the Council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared "ammunition" in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support.
.

"The UN is but a long-range, international banking apparatus clearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One-World revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power. "The depression was the calculated 'shearing' of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market....The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank." Curtis Dall, FDR's son-in-law as quoted in his book, My Exploited Father-in-Law
.

37."Today the path of total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people. Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government - a bureaucratic elite." Senator William Jenner, 1954
.

40."The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds' central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups." Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World in Our Time (Macmillan Company, 1966,) Professor Carroll Quigley of Georgetown University, highly esteemed by his former student, William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.
.

111. "We are going to impose our agenda on the coverage by dealing with issues and subjects that we choose to deal with". Richard M. Cohen, former Senior Producer of CBS political news
.

1883: What part has Skull & Bones played in our elections? Professor Carroll Quigley was President Clinton's mentor, and in Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World In our Time the professor revealed that William C. Whitney (S&B) and others, in the late 19th century, developed a plan to control both major political parties through financial contributions and have the two main parties alternate power so the public would think it had a choice.[7] Professor Quigley said Whitney's plan lasted about 16 years, and after that, the "Eastern Establishment" (power elite) moved the Democrat and Republican presidential candidates toward the political center:
.

1891: Cecil John Rhodes organized a secret society to take control of the world. His mentor at Oxford University was John Ruskin. Ruskin has a swastika engraved on his gravestone, just as Rhodes Trust member Rudyard Kipling has on the covers of his early books.[11] Prior to Adolph Hitler, the swastika, which reportedly also has been seen at the S&B vault at Yale University, was an elitist symbol. In an apparent contradiction, John Ruskin referred to himself as a Tory and a Communist. [12]However, one must realize that the elite have no qualms about working with both the political left and the political right, with an ultimate goal of synthesizing them into a world socialist government.
.

22. Laventi Beria Stalin's chief of security By Psychopolitics our chief goals are carriedforward. To produce a maximum of chaos in the culture ... is our firstmost important step." "Our fruits are grown in chaos, distrust,economic depression, and scientific turmoil. At last a weary populace can seekpeace only in our offered Communist State;
.

83."Bear in mind, the five-pointed star, like the Soviet one, which shines all over Europe, the star composed of the five Rothschild brothers with their banks, who possess colossal accumulations of wealth, the greatest ever known." Christian G.Rakovsky Bolshevik founder Describes a Financial International based on money and banking, which founded and controls the Communist International Red Symphony
.

Walls . . . wall out . . . and wall in . . . be careful what you wall yourself in with.

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: whywhynot
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

Being half white/brown,red or green is no inoculation against racism. In fact I find your remark racist. Notice that I didn't call you a racist simply that your remark appeared to be.

You find my remark to be racist? Seriously?????
Explain. Now.

You divide your world along racial lines. That is racist. You said that O was half white as a defense, that is racist. Kind of hurts when the shoe is on the other foot don't it?

originally posted by: BlueMule
a reply to: nighthawk1954

I'm not going to waste time on a southern republican and his bull#. But I am going to waste time telling you how little I think of republicans, especially southern ones. They can sit on it.

You succeeded in wasting time.

originally posted by: whywhynot

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: whywhynot
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

Being half white/brown,red or green is no inoculation against racism. In fact I find your remark racist. Notice that I didn't call you a racist simply that your remark appeared to be.

You find my remark to be racist? Seriously?????
Explain. Now.

You divide your world along racial lines. That is racist. You said that O was half white as a defense, that is racist. Kind of hurts when the shoe is on the other foot don't it?

Oooookay..... so someone claims that Obama hates whites, I point out that he's half-white, and that somehow makes me a racist??? Yeah, right, good luck with that one.

a reply to: jimmyx

Sometimes I think your a plant that uses reverse psychology to get people to actually support conservatives lol.

You make liberals look bad, and generally speaking, they are not.

a reply to: jimmyx

I agree with Jimmy. I think no matter what this man does in office, the GOP slams it. Even things the Republicans themselves started, Romney had health care in MA and Obamacare is his plan, they were all for immigration reform until Obama stood for it and now it's a dirty word. If he had stayed over there in Iraq with a large contingency of soldiers, the GOP would have made an issue of that. The right thing to do was leave the Iraqis to see if they CAN take care of themselves after being trained to do so. I think we spent 41B on training and equipment for them. Why not get our boys out of there and see if they can? What was the point of training them and spending that money if we did not intend to leave? Look at Benghazi, captured the ringleader, no credit at all (sure glory goes to the soldiers on the ground) but hey, if GWB can end a war he was never in, Obama can capture the bad guys too. Bin Laden...does anyone care that he was captured? He was almost incidental to the Republicans. Everything Obama does, someone comes running out with the Constitution in hand and says he is violating it. LOL They don't say that about the drones though. They LIKE the drones. Fits their MO.

a reply to: Loveaduck

I guess it's easy to hate all Republicans if you believe the twisted, half-truths which you hastily listed.

As a guy who knows history and has closely followed US politics (almost to an obsession) for the past seven years, I have begun to see a pattern in those who continue to support Obama and his modern progressive cult.

These people have peeled back several layers of the onion, enough to see that all is not well in Washington DC. However instead of peeling back a few more layers to find the truth, they buy into the perverted truths and outright lies being spouted by the Obama administration and his Congressional puppets. Convinced that they have identified Republicans as the bad guys, these people stop thinking critically and simply parrot the Democrat party lines.

It's a very human mistake, as most people tend to stop analyzing things once they have them figured out. The Obama administration knows of this human tendency, and they seek to exploit the ignorant and halfway-informed voters at every turn. Every speech this President makes, every statement released by this White House is carefully composed such that the uninformed voter will be deceived.

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: Gryphon66

I don't think of that church as remotely Christian.

I certainly don't think of the white-hatred-spewing pastor the least bit Christian.

And for the current Destroyer-in-Chief to claim he sat in that church for 20 years and was uninfluenced by the white-hatred

is just more example of his pathological lying habits.

Who cares what your personal opinion is of these Christians? You're only one person, at the very best, a sinner saved by grace. This congregation is and has been recognized as a Christian church by their own statement and confession.

You don't get to decide who's "good enough to be Christian" that's a decision only God can make.

Shame on you for letting your rampant political beliefs generate such hateful speech toward your brothers and sisters in Christ Jesus!

I don't expect it to make a difference, but, which ever "side" of this argument you see yourself on ... please look at the words being used here to refer to others, it's hatred quite pure and simple. As is most of Gowdy's speech, unsurprisingly.

We are all Americans, like it or not. If you truly believe in this country, you'll stop the rabid division-ism and figure out how to work together.

IMHO.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Christ said it best.

What fellowship has light with darkness?

a reply to: Gryphon66

I won't discourage your ranting against divisive attitudes, but it is not rational to believe that everyone who wears a particular label is justified in doing so.

If a peaceful, non-violent Muslim calls out a jihadist group as not following Muslim scripture, would you respond to that person in the same way you did to Bo Xian?

Your claim that Senator Gowdy's speech expresses hatred is absurd. Hate against whom? The President for overreaching, or the House for neglecting their duty?

Jesus also said "Judge not that you be not judged (and the part that most people leave off) for you will be judged with the same measure that you judge others by."

The Spirit says in 1 Corinthians 2:11 through Paul that "No one can know a person's thoughts except that person's own spirit, and no one can know God's thoughts except God's own Spirit."

God will judge both those who falsely accuse and those accused as well as those who falsely claim to speak in His name.

As far as Gowdy's speech, labelling it hatred might well be a bit simplistic for complete accuracy, good point! It was a brief comment in light of the fact that either side of the false dichotomy that represents the current American political dialogue has already been trumpeted herein with full media-sponsored glory with assigned rhetoric ... but the fact remains that the brand of short-sighted, heavily-scripted, factually-challenged, aping of real dialogue (not to mention real patriotism and Americanism) that Gowdy performs in his speech is nothing new, and nothing more than the same neurolinguistically constructed divisiveness that pollutes every speech, every act, every media report, every day now, in this country.

The Land of the Free has been co-opted to become nothing more than a laboratory for large-scale psychological manipulation. Look at the ludicrosity that "both sides" employ.

Those of you arguing "for Gowdy" are merely carrying water for the "Red Team" in this horse-pissing race.

You're precisely no better than "the other side" you spew so much hatred at.

Yep, hatred. Look it up.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Jesus also said "Judge not that you be not judged (and the part that most people leave off) for you will be judged with the same measure that you judge others by."

The Spirit says in 1 Corinthians 2:11 through Paul that "No one can know a person's thoughts except that person's own spirit, and no one can know God's thoughts except God's own Spirit."

God will judge both those who falsely accuse and those accused as well as those who falsely claim to speak in His name.

As far as Gowdy's speech, labelling it hatred might well be a bit simplistic for complete accuracy, good point! It was a brief comment in light of the fact that either side of the false dichotomy that represents the current American political dialogue has already been trumpeted herein with full media-sponsored glory with assigned rhetoric ... but the fact remains that the brand of short-sighted, heavily-scripted, factually-challenged, aping of real dialogue (not to mention real patriotism and Americanism) that Gowdy performs in his speech is nothing new, and nothing more than the same neurolinguistically constructed divisiveness that pollutes every speech, every act, every media report, every day now, in this country.

The Land of the Free has been co-opted to become nothing more than a laboratory for large-scale psychological manipulation. Look at the ludicrosity that "both sides" employ.

Those of you arguing "for Gowdy" are merely carrying water for the "Red Team" in this horse-pissing race.

You're precisely no better than "the other side" you spew so much hatred at.

Yep, hatred. Look it up.

I know we had a Gentlemans agreement not to interact, but I could not help giving you a star for your comment.

As an athiest, I don't care what "Jesus said." And I think theism should have nothing to do with legislation. Although I think Gowdy did make several important points in his speech, we cannot blindly accept points from either side.

a reply to: jimmyx
“Those who address race the most, are usually the most racist”
-propulsion

a reply to: NavyDoc



I'm not a Christian either and put no more stock in The Bible than in Bulfinch's.

However, those that do believe in the Book should follow it, IMHO.

Thanks for the star. (You make a lot of sense sometimes yourself.)

a reply to: jimmyx

to me he just another white racist.

So all white people are racists? Sounds to me like your the racist. It's the only way idiots can beat logic, just ridicule them.

originally posted by: jimmyx
the house DOES NOT MAKE LAW....the senate and the president have to sign off on it, also...why????....because that is what is written in the constitution....he wasted five minutes of congressional time on a "supposed bill" (stupid as it was) to make a point that the president needs to "step and fetch it"......let's face it.....white southerners such as trey gowdy hate the fact that Obama is president...to me he just another white racist.

Is that in the Constitution? Really man?

Prior to the New Deal, legislation was tightly written to minimize any executive branch interpretation. Only in this way can law be accountable to the people. If the executive branch that enforces the law also writes the law, "all legislative powers" are no longer vested in elected representatives in Congress. The Constitution is violated, and the separation of powers is breached.

The principle that power delegated to Congress by the people cannot be delegated by Congress to the executive branch was the mainstay of our political system. Until President Roosevelt overturned this principle by threatening to pack the Supreme Court, the executive branch had no role in interpreting the law.

John Marshall Harlan wrote: "That congress cannot delegate legislative power to the president is a principle universally recognized as vital to the integrity and maintenance of the system of government ordained by the Constitution."

We have had 7 decade of Imperial Presidencies as a result of the new deal legislation!

originally posted by: whywhynot
a reply to: TerryMcGuire

What I found was not a sensationalist article but one which simply reported on a current news report. Unbiased

PLEASE.

www.salon.com...
Salon is a political liberal and progressive news website, with content updated each day.[1] Part of Salon Media Group (OTC

Link

Hardly Unbiased it is so desperate to keep from losing more million that they resort to sensationalist headlines. Sound like any other rags you know?

www.siliconbeat.com...

OK, they admit to being a liberal website. Aside from that, can you point out any parts of the article that are wrong? I see this all the time on here. People immediately dismiss CNN, fox, etc. because of their political leanings, but they never explain HOW they're wrong. So out of curiosity, since I know very little about this man, what does the article in question have wrong or lie about?

a reply to: Donkey_Dean

One wonders how you would interpret the Louisiana Purchase by President Jefferson, seeing that FDR was the first President to "interpret" the laws he was charged with Executing.

Or perhaps, Jackson's abolishment of the Second Bank of the United States ...

Or perhaps, Lincoln's choice to sign the Emancipation Proclamation ...

... for starters.