It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For me, drawing a complex geometric drawing (or folding as in origami) my measurements and lines are just a tad off and as I add to the drawing the error increases for each iteration. Sure I can do a perfect drawing on a computer and print it out and its accurate in all its measurements and angles, but I cannot do that my hand. The level of difficultly in doing in with the precision I seen in many crop circles, over an uneven field (even slightly), in the dark, in a short period of time with just a string and board (s) is one I can't imagine.
originally posted by: JokerThe1st
a reply to: FyreByrd
For me, drawing a complex geometric drawing (or folding as in origami) my measurements and lines are just a tad off and as I add to the drawing the error increases for each iteration. Sure I can do a perfect drawing on a computer and print it out and its accurate in all its measurements and angles, but I cannot do that my hand. The level of difficultly in doing in with the precision I seen in many crop circles, over an uneven field (even slightly), in the dark, in a short period of time with just a string and board (s) is one I can't imagine.
I will second that. i spend a lot of my spare time drawing symmetrical patterns/symbols and can say that even with rulers,compass's,square's etc... mistakes are easily made and one mistake throws the entire drawing out.
Doing these kind of patterns would be near impossible at night time and from the ground especially given there overall accuracy of symmetry.
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
originally posted by: RifRAAF
To me this looks like the Earth and moon, the small dot being the moon... I have no idea what any of the other iconography is...
Interesting......do you mean the smallest dot which seems to be orbiting the larger interior circle, or the middle sized dark circle on the outside connected to the inner large circle?
Maybe the inside circle represents the Earth, the one dot which looks like to be orbiting could be the moon, and the larger one on the outside could be the Sun?
I'm saying it should be tested during daylight using the same methods as confirmed by the people who claim they do it
and then retested at night under the same conditions
there is not a shred of evidence to support human made origins of thousands of circles
And if you look at the best of the circlemaker circles and compare them with the best of the circles that have no evidence of human origin
In 1686 an even earlier British account of geometric areas of flattened plants is found in A Natural History of Staffordshire, written by Professor Robert Plot, LLD, the first "keeper" of Oxford's Ashmolean Museum and a professor of chemistry at Oxford. Professor Plot describes not just circles, but flattened areas "obtaining three parts of a circle, others being Semicircular, some of them Quadrants." These various designs were found both in "arable grounds" and in "open pastures ... And not only in a single, but sometimes in double and treble Circle[s], one within the other."