It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: HardCorps
another new bit
The Guardian's Paul Lewis has a few more details on Speaker John Boehner's comments about Iraq.
"Obama's failure to reach a status-of-forces agreement continues to have serious consequences for Iraq and American influence in the region," he told reporters on Thursday.
He sad the administration's "failed policies" in the region, in particular in Syria, Libya and Egypt, "is having a direct impact on the situation in Iraq".
Can't just put all this on Obama--- fact is--- no one wants us over there so of course the status-of-forces agreement was bound to stall out
originally posted by: ColCurious
a reply to: HardCorps
proxy-war strategy against Assad in Syria.... our own intelligence people caused this!
.
The jihadist organization, isis, was unhappy that the US was not giving them "good" weapons to beat Syria with.
France has called for swift international action said on the crisis, with foreign minister Laurent Fabius saying Isis "poses a serious threat to the stability of the region", Reuters reports.
Iran 'deploys two battalions of the Quds force with experience of fighting in Iraq to help their Iraq counterparts defend Samara and win back parts of Tikrit' - Wall Street Journal reports
White House says US not contemplating sending ground troops into Iraq - air strikes remain a possibility following Obama's comments that all options are open.
“The most important thing is the safe and secure return of our personnel and their families to Turkey. In Syria or Iraq or anywhere in the world, those who jeopardise the lives of our people will receive the harshest retaliation. Nobody should test the determination and capability of Turkey,” said Davutoglu. The United States has pledged any “appropriate assistance” to help the Iraqi government fend off a rapid military advance by Sunni militants
Why should Persian Shia:s of Iran intervene in Arabic Sunni affairs that is controlled by House of Saud/Saudi Arabia Wahhabi. Syria is another matter for Iran since there are Shia in Syria.
originally posted by: HardCorps
a reply to: whyamIhere
What really pisses me off---
This makes everything we did over there---totally 'Meaningless'
Now I can point to the first of my two purple hearts and say
"I got this one, for no reason whatsoever!"