It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: milomilo
originally posted by: yuppa
I swear. That really makes me angry. What are they going to use to replace it? Apaches? HA! dont make me laugh! the F-35? not likely. No the Soldiers are going to be left out in the cold this time.
Please feel free to post your respects.
why would you be angry over such trivial stuff ? A10 are not survivable on modern battlefield filled with large calibre AAA and MANPADS. Even the AH64 and the rest of Army Choppers wont be on the FLOT because they are even in worse danger than A10..
against real enemy with full anti air support and missiles, american will lose.. so why worry ?
originally posted by: MrSpad
originally posted by: milomilo
originally posted by: yuppa
I swear. That really makes me angry. What are they going to use to replace it? Apaches? HA! dont make me laugh! the F-35? not likely. No the Soldiers are going to be left out in the cold this time.
Please feel free to post your respects.
why would you be angry over such trivial stuff ? A10 are not survivable on modern battlefield filled with large calibre AAA and MANPADS. Even the AH64 and the rest of Army Choppers wont be on the FLOT because they are even in worse danger than A10..
against real enemy with full anti air support and missiles, american will lose.. so why worry ?
This like the Carrier is doomed claims. However, the A-10 like the Carrier does not exist or fight in a vacuum. In a large scale war (what is was designed for) the A-10 would play its role very well. This was a weapons system designed to fight while the enemy had a massive advantage in numbers of both combat aircraft and ground based air defenses. Of course nobody has that avantage against the USAF anymore in Aircraft numbers and as we have always seem ground based airdefense systems have always been shown to be easly defeated by simple counter measures.
The question of the A-10 is if it is needed or not. It adapted very well to operating against insurgents and such. Which is what its primary mission would be now, and which not many other options can fill that role. its former primary mission of dealing with massed armor formations is no longer really valid as those formations no longer exist and when facing US airpower they would be quickly chewed up by a variety of weapons systems.
Granted most nations do not have commited CAS options and instead depend on artillery or mrls for support. The speed of US forces makes that a bit harder though.
originally posted by: SubTruth
a reply to: milomilo
Ya Japan was real successful. You have no idea what you are talking about. And to say carriers are doomed just shows a lack of understanding of what you are trying to get across.
I remember back before the war in Iraq so many armchair warriors were saying America would fail...........I am betting you were one of these people.
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: milomilo
Depends on WHY now doesn't it?
No we won ALL the fighting our LEADERSHIP gave them up,check again
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: milomilo
I'm sorry I haven't read the Soviet texts. Next thing we'll hear from ol BAGDAD BOB here how we lost the 1st Iraq war too. Are JINNS aliens? Why can't arabs knife fight worth a damn?
How is that new Calph coming along for you,by the way?
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: milomilo
I can't really say BELIEVE but the possiblity is there just in case so I can handle it if it's true . I went off topic because you haven't validated YOUR authority on a thing where I AM who I say I am. A former army scout ,where as YOU are a talking head from Timbuk tu apparently,who is spewing propagand that is straight out of a manual from Russia.
I'm a liar? Im NOT a 19D10?
what are YOUR qualifications other that the ability to create a monty python argument sketch?