What it all amounts to is that Russia has the tools at it's disposal to deny NATO air superiority for a short while. Enough time to move some ground
troops a few hundred kilometers and to bring up some of those fancy-schmancy s300 & s400 SAMs to protect them when NATO counter punches. Certainly not
a cut and dried victory over NATO, but I don't think that would matter much to Poland, FInland or the Baltics.
edit on 6-6-2014 by Orwells
Ghost because: Spelling & such
Interesting that they said this will have no effect on the testing program. Looks like it burned pretty good to me. I would think they might want to
have that figured out......just a thought.
It'll hurt them short term, because they lose an airframe for testing. But long term, unless it turns out to be something major, it won't hurt the
program much.
What leaps out at you straight off the bat? The extensive damage on the rear left hand side? the upper portion? or the radiation warning? (no, look
again, I didn't mean the nose cone)
Has it been mentioned which engine the burned aircraft was running? Seen speculation on another forum (From a native Russian) That this aircraft may
have been running the newer one?
originally posted by: _Del_
a reply to: Astr0
One of the nice things about a phased array is being able to put a couple T/R modules pretty much anywhere.
Indeed. I was wondering if any one else was going to pick up on that.
Pretty sure, you'll find a few more modules in the beaver tail eventually if they havent already. There are supposed to be five arrays planned in
total.