Red Alert: Did a Nuclear Device Explode off the Japanese Coast? (Video Included)

a reply to: BobAthome

So it seems the ATS consensus is "most likely underwater volcano." Which is great and all, but

I really thought we'd know something concrete by now?

And we don't. So it's even weirder! Just checked around and still don't see ANYTHING about this. (Aside from what's in the OP of course.)

I see a poster said something about the Japanese news suggesting this was a NK sub hitting one of ours? I'm having zero luck googling this, if there's an article on that news source's website, can someone link it?

I'm intrigued if this is what is being reported, considering we have pretty much crickets to go on. If true, the lack of information on it could be telling. Why comment on it if you're still trying to figure out if and how to retaliate?

originally posted by: Ameilia

Around 10:30 am: Kume (MAY) the 21st, there was a 110th report “black smoke is seen off the coast of northern Kume Island, there was a sound of explosion,” the man from the town of Kume. According to (19), explosion of “Dawn” is heard twice, to the sea to the north of the city, saw the “big black smoke.

Red Alert: Did a Nuclear Device Explode off the Japanese Coast? (Video Included)

So I can't tell. But I read the SGT Report (at least scanning headlines) frequently and that is where I found this information and video. The video though, is a video of a video, which I find odd, I want the original. Also the video has the words "Truth Frequency Radio" which is hosted by a person named Kev Baker, and I don't know anything about this person.

I'm sure someone on ATS does, so speak up please.

My first guess is this has to be something other than nuclear. But yes, I'm posting anyway.

Edit: No clue why the video won't work. Here is the URL:
www.youtube.com...

My apologies. If someone else can post this, go ahead. Thanks.

Second edit: It's now working....

I agree with the volcano theory

BTW we have satellites that can detect a mortar fire if not a hand gun, so if this was a nuke we would know.

a reply to: LA1IMPALA

Unless those in charge of those satellites didn't want us to know about it.

Not saying that is the case tho

a reply to: LA1IMPALA

Do you know what I love about the americans on ATS. They believe that their satellites are so good they can see a flea on an elephants ass, but they don't believe that those grainy google earth photos are originals, or the grainy photos of the moon, or other celestial bodies are natural. We have never seen these ultra high def supposed satellite images.... ever. We have never seen anything miraculous detected by a satellite, # even hurricanes that are hundreds of miles across aren't always tracked perfectly by these miraculous satellites.

JUST SAYING !

When it's something beneficial to the American Ego, it absolutely exists evidence or none.

For a super awesome satellite to detect something it has to be over head, for it to take a picture of something it has to be focused on that area, or object. Considering a nuclear exposion happens pretty much at the speed of light I really doubt one or even 100 satellites could look at every inch of the earth at all times. It's not possible, this is the santa claus effect. Warm fuzzy, cozy, make you feel safe white lies governments tell their subordinates to make them feel, well safe.

US Military satellites don't give two #s whether the average american is safe. They care about military assets, resources and logistics and don't #ing doubt that for a second. You, the US citizen are nothing unless of course you are between the ages of 16- and 35 at which point you are a potential resource.

a reply to: Sremmos80

And how are they going to hide it from the seismographs around the world that would detect it? Not just the US, but all over the place.

a reply to: Hijinx

That's the beauty of satellites with light sensors hooked up to computers -- they don't necessarily need to be looking directly at only one thing to observe a specific phenomenon; they can look at hundreds, or even thousands, of places at once.

Take the Kepler planet hunting space telescope, for example. It finds planets by looking for variations in the brightness of stars that may occur when a planet passes in front of that star. You may be asking yourself "what does that have to do with this topic?"...

...Well, the point is that Kepler not only looks at one specific star at a time when searching -- but it looks at 100,000 stars simultaneously. It's able to do this because the separate pixels of its overall light sensor are each being monitored separately by a computer.

Similarly, a satellite whose job it is to detect a nuclear explosion somewhere could have light sensors that cover very large portions of the earth and be looking at many different parts of Earth simultaneous, with thousands of tiny pixels in that light sensor searching for specific light signatures that would be associated with a nuclear blast. It's not like there is some guy looking at an image of one small part of the planet, one small part at a time.

the only "blip" in the normal radar.

"http://www.stripes.com/news/pacific/japan/misawa-bound-c-12-makes-emergency-landing-1.284798"

Stars and Stripes
Published: May 23, 2014
"Misawa-bound C-12 makes emergency landing"

YOKOTA AIR BASE, Japan — A U.S. C-12 logistics support aircraft made an emergency landing at Fukushima Airport at about 7 p.m. Thursday night.

Make of it what u wish.




a reply to: Ameilia

a reply to: Zaphod58

I said I didn't think it was the case, just pointing out that just cause we have the satellites doesn't mean they release everything they see with them.
And you are right with the seismographs

a reply to: BobAthome

That isn't even a blip. It happens all the time.

a reply to: Sremmos80

Oh they're not going to show us a fraction of what those satellites see. We don't even get to see the scrubbed photos. But I know you are saying you don't agree with it. I was just pointing out that there was more than one piece of evidence that would show it, and that there would be people the world over that would have seen it, so it's not something that could be hidden as easily as is claimed.

originally posted by: BobAthome
Stars and Stripes
Published: May 23, 2014
"Misawa-bound C-12 makes emergency landing"

YOKOTA AIR BASE, Japan — A U.S. C-12 logistics support aircraft made an emergency landing at Fukushima Airport at about 7 p.m. Thursday night.

Fukushima is about 900 miles from the area in question (an area of the east China sea west of Okinawa and north of Kume Island). There are a lot of other/better places to make an emergency landing between those two places -- or even places in other directions from Fukushima that are closer to the area in question, such as South Korea.

It seems more likely that it is simply an unrelated emergency landing.

a reply to: Zaphod58

Oh ya I am not going to come on here and try and say that a nuclear explosion could be hidden, just that they don't show us what those fancy satellites see


As far as the OP goes, do we have anything concrete on what it was?
The volcano or the two subs hitting makes the most sense but haven't seen anything to confirm?

Whatever caused the explosion, be it artificial or natural, it's clear it is being deliberately kept quiet, or else it would be all over the news services by now.

Which makes a natural event unlikely.

Which leaves artificial...which could be a lot of things.

a reply to: MysterX

I concur. Something might be up.

I thought I heard an E-4 flying around the other day. That place I mentioned earlier often has one parked near by.

originally posted by: Sremmos80 Unless those in charge of those satellites didn't want us to know about it.

precisely.

originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People

originally posted by: BobAthome
Stars and Stripes
Published: May 23, 2014
"Misawa-bound C-12 makes emergency landing"

YOKOTA AIR BASE, Japan — A U.S. C-12 logistics support aircraft made an emergency landing at Fukushima Airport at about 7 p.m. Thursday night.

Fukushima is about 900 miles from the area in question (an area of the east China sea west of Okinawa and north of Kume Island). There are a lot of other/better places to make an emergency landing between those two places -- or even places in other directions from Fukushima that are closer to the area in question, such as South Korea.

It seems more likely that it is simply an unrelated emergency landing.

Im just reporting facts,,


but an EMP might cause some smoke in a cockpit, but thats just speculation,,

a reply to: BobAthome

It didn't during Starfish Prime. And that test knocked out power and phones hundreds of miles away in Hawaii. But the planes right under it didn't have any problems. If shielding was that good back then it should be better now.

magnetism and current flow, producing heat, causes breakdowns in unaligned electrons, forcing current flow.
When electromagnetic pulses are thrown at electrical circuits,,anything can and usually does, go wrong.
just an observation.
a reply to: Zaphod58