It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
BEIJING, May 20 (Xinhua) -- Chinese Defense Ministry spokesman Geng Yansheng on Tuesday said that China strongly opposes the U.S. Justice Department's indictment against five Chinese military officers.
The U.S. side announced the indictment against five Chinese military officers on allegations of cyber theft on May 19. China lodged protests with the U.S. side following the announcement, urging the U.S. side to immediately correct its mistake and withdraw the indictment, Geng said.
According to Geng, the position of the Chinese government on cyber security is consistent and clear-cut. China is steadfast in upholding cyber security. The Chinese government, the Chinese military and their relevant personnel have never engaged or participated in cyber theft of trade secrets. The U.S. accusation against Chinese personnel is groundless with ulterior motives.
Geng said the relevant U.S. institutions have long been involved in large-scale and organized cyber theft as well as wiretapping and surveillance activities against foreign political leaders, companies and individuals.
Geng said the U.S. side has adopted double standards on cyber security and the Chinese military is also a victim of cyber theft.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: ThePublicEnemyNo1
Show me a flinch move:
War of 1812, Vietnam and likely Afghanistan come to mind.
No offense.
originally posted by: pheonix358
So State sponsored spying is great but, hang on, China is using State Sponsored spying. I can't really see the difference especially when you consider this sort of crap.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
It seems to be a case of "If we do it it's OK, but if you do it, it's not."
P
originally posted by: musicismagic
originally posted by: pheonix358
So State sponsored spying is great but, hang on, China is using State Sponsored spying. I can't really see the difference especially when you consider this sort of crap.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
It seems to be a case of "If we do it it's OK, but if you do it, it's not."
P
That's the American political and law way of thinking and America actually think it right.
originally posted by: ThePublicEnemyNo1
originally posted by: musicismagic
originally posted by: pheonix358
So State sponsored spying is great but, hang on, China is using State Sponsored spying. I can't really see the difference especially when you consider this sort of crap.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
It seems to be a case of "If we do it it's OK, but if you do it, it's not."
P
That's the American political and law way of thinking and America actually think it right.
So are you on any side?
originally posted by: ThePublicEnemyNo1
, I said who "flinched"? The Us didn't flinch. As a matter of fact it was a matter originally of French Colonialism within Viet Nam, that the US carried out. We all know the reason for Viet Nam. I do, if you don't, then you need to research that war...not me. Certainly was not a flinch move.
originally posted by: ThePublicEnemyNo1
Afghanistan, where and when did we flinch? Our peeps went in looking for that bad guy. If I remember history correct they found him. Doesn't matter where, they found his ass and buried him. Unfortunately, we're still there. No flinching on our part my friend.
originally posted by: ThePublicEnemyNo1
War of 1812/Anglo-American War, you certainly are mistaken
originally posted by: ThePublicEnemyNo1 "After", that's the key word here and we never flinched. America declared war for a huge number of reasons prior to 1812. Well, they lost, not us
originally posted by: ThePublicEnemyNo1
...and here we are. It was a response to them trying that crap again. Again..
originally posted by: ThePublicEnemyNo1
The only time "America" has had to "react" to a declaration of "war" or "aggression" was when the Japanese hit Pearl Harbor. That's not even flinching. That's reacting to cowards simply put.
originally posted by: ThePublicEnemyNo1
But, then again, we did get Osama...Britain didn't get him nor anyone else :up
originally posted by: ThePublicEnemyNo1
: See where I'm going here,
originally posted by: ThePublicEnemyNo1
throughout our "American" history, not European history....that's some other stuff.
originally posted by: ThePublicEnemyNo1
Real historians know better.
originally posted by: Fylgje
If the US gove really wanted to end Chinas career, then all they'd have to do is stop loading shelves with everything 'made in china'. Build factories in America and lets make all these things ourselves. Can you imagine how maqny good jobs there would be? We could end china really easy. All this between china and America is just an act that many people will believe.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: pheonix358
Since when does US law apply to people outside their country.
)
I know right?
In the UK the USA kidnap and extradite British citizen at there whim for US crimes that are not illegal in the UK and whose actions were done in the UK.
originally posted by: TDawg61
We are waiting to see list of "Kidnap"victims and their crimes that we must spend thousands of dollars"Whimsically"extraditing.
You manage to make these idiotic claims in every thread regardless of topic without provable source,I.e.b/s.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: mikegrouchy
Some people here are so hellbent on wanting to hurt the US they can't think clearly. As I pointed out the Chinese have destroyed thelives of MILLIONS of Americans. They don't care about that though.