It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JDJ333
originally posted by: htapath
originally posted by: JDJ333
It's a fake. You can zoom in to the object with any basic CG program (MS Paint) and see the border of the clouds around the object are lighter in color than the surrounding clouds. Copied/paste.
The image has NOT been altered in any way. These are the same old tactics that have been used to discredit and derail UFO threads since the inception of the internet. The image is 100% genuine. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Sorry, You're right. I have NO idea what I was thinking, thank you.
What I meant to say is, it appears to have been artificially cropped. When the object is viewed at 400% zoom the contrast of the object, its boarder and the cloud that the object is "pasted" to does not match the surrounding cloud. It appears as if someone needed to brush up on their blending technique. It very well could be an effect of the camera phone.
I am not trying to discredit you on the picture because I have an underlying plan to derail UFO threads. I have seen my share of UFOs, and some so close that had you seen with your own eyes, would have you crying mommy.
Peace
I haven't finished catching up on this thread for the evening, yet, but I just want to throw my two cents in and agree on this. I think you should create a thread for this, Alienreality, if you haven't done so already.
originally posted by: alienreality
a reply to: rhynouk
Not directing this at you at all,, (you just looked like a good shoulder to rant on but ufo discussions are not providing progress in life for anyone except the military with all the hostility and ridicule about misidentifications.
I'm usually pro UFO, but that doesn't mean I just say it and run off, and I went all the way from saying it looks like a military/alien hybrid contraption, to actually Identifying this bird's species, which is the Arizona black vulture. But I saw no reason to be mean spirited towards the OP..
No one else here did much except ridicule and badger the op, plus just lay there in their homes all sauced and belligerent and about to light their bed on fire from carelessness.
It is ridiculous to piss away these opportunities to get the brain moving, and use them instead to piss on posters.. Wouldn't you agree?
Who cares if someone misidentifies things? That is how the best minds in the world learn things, trial and error describes humanity perfectly anyway. Being ready to judge and ridicule is exactly what the Air Force wanted the public to do way back before blue-book, which they did specifically because Barry Goldwater was all up in their arse about ufo's (he was one reason) and they couldn't get congress off of their backs because of that publicity, and just look now still at all the posters comments in most every UFO thread to see how successful their (military) multi million dollar a year budget to get us all doing that job for them has been.
I'm going to keep reminding people of this because it should be said, even if it's off topic.. (I'll do a thread on this if post is out of bounds) There have been many done on the same issue, but repetition is not a bad thing)
This is a very beautiful sunset picture as well as illustrating your point. Thank you for sharing it, PhoenixReborn!
originally posted by: PheonixReborn
a reply to: htapath
That's the thing about birds; we're so used to seeing them that we don't notice them when our concentration is on something else.
I took this pic a while back and was so intent on getting the clouds and contrast right I didn't notice the whole flock of birds which were obviously in plain sight at the time.
originally posted by: PheonixReborn
htapath
I've tried to be light-hearted in this thread.
Let me be serious.
You were concentrating on getting the photo of the clouds. You weren't looking at anything else. You didn't notice the bird flying through the shot. You're friends were not there as expert witnesses to say they did not see anything in shot as they were probably not even looking in the direction you were when you took the shot.
I've provided a shot of my own which I took without noticing an entire flock of birds, one of which looks like a black triangle UFO. It isn't. It's a bird.
Can you not open yourself up to the possibility that what you shot was a bird and not an extraterrestrial space craft?
I realise you have invested yourself quite a lot so far in this thread but it may be time for you to let go and admit the obvious.
Best Wishes.
It is ridiculous to piss away these opportunities to get the brain moving, and use them instead to piss on posters.. Wouldn't you agree?
originally posted by: htapath
a reply to: Antoniastar
Cha-ching! That's what I'm talking about Antoniastar! So nice of you to take the time to help us peer through the mask of this object(s). And no, I hadn't noticed the object on the ground at all! Kudos for that as well. There are no houses within two miles of that junction, so it's not a plant covering. Will have to meditate on that one heh.
As for the eye in the sky, it looks like the bird hypothesis has taken a tailspin. It's too bad that some members tend to make snap judgements on things that don't conform to the accepted normalcy bias. I say join the party and look around with a new set of eyes.
Anyway, this entire area is a sacred place where all kinds of energies are hanging around. Some things just have to be experienced first hand to gain a complete understanding. Grand Canyon is a good example, and it's not far from the photographed location. I could go on for pages along these lines. Suffice to say anyone who is on an inward path should visit this area for a few weeks. It's where serenity lives and fear dies.
I'm still no closer to putting a specific label on the object, I must profess. But I'm moderately confident that it's some type of non-local intelligent energy. Whether or not the anomalous object on the ground is directly related is beyond me.
Those little dots that outline the left side of the object are also very curious.
originally posted by: htapath
a reply to: Antoniastar
The close-ups are revealing, in that the object on the ground seems much more connected to the one in the sky. Did the camera catch something in transition, or is a transition occurring because the object sensed it was being digitally imaged? Questions, questions.
I will be more alert to the presence of these kinds of clouds from this point forward. When I took the picture, I felt the clouds were somehow looking back at me. I got goosebumps when I finally saw the object and it was dead center at the top of the photo.
Your participation in this thread is mucho apprecianado Toni!!!