It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
a reply to: AfterInfinity
(Post DELETED) by author with anger. Not to FlyersFan, but to the OP.
I am in agreement with everything FlyersFan has said.
edit on 09-22-2013 by mysterioustranger because: (no reason given)
well all thats fine. I'd like to know how you would react if you are slapped. Why is it that all my christian colleagues, at best, are like any other people....they dont go out of their way to do favors or be nice to people. One christian I know mocked me for handing out money to a beggar saying 'dont encourage beggars'. Ive known plenty of Christians all y life, and none of them displayed any moral behaviour out of the ordinary....and were far from turning the cheek.
originally posted by: dollukka
Jesus made the law easier
So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets
He basicly asked people to use their common sense, see themselves in a position of others. It was not following old rules blindfolded but more opening their eyes for what is right and what is wrong.
Matthew 7:21
Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
Matthew 7:24-29
Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:
And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock.
And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand:
And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.
And it came to pass, when Jesus had ended these sayings, the people were astonished at his doctrine:
For he taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes.
haha. I only made this thread last evening. I dont sit around refreshing the page every five seconds. I keep checking on replies, but wait longer to start posting. And not a single point of op has been directly addressed., all I've gotten so far is some vague philosophy revolving around the bible. Ill ask YOU directly....Have you ever been angry wih someone? Then according to Jesus youre guilty of murder. Are you that saintly that you never feel any anger? Or have you found a convenient loop hole around the problem? Or are you not guilty because Jesus anyway ''died'' for your sin of 'murder'...that is is if you ever felt anger/hatred.
originally posted by: grandmakdw
I noticed that Scorpion abandoned this thread.
He did a hit and run.
Mods, is there a rule about posting something potentially incendiary and then abandoning the thread?
He appears to not have the courage to give a reasonable response to even one poster.
originally posted by: sk0rpi0n
Or is it that a christian who fails to keep Jesus' commandments gets saved anyway because jesus 'died' for his sins? Then just what was the point of Jesus teaching to turn cheeks and love enemies?
Matthew 6:14-15
For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you:
But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.
haha. I only made this thread last evening. I dont sit around refreshing the page every five seconds. I keep checking on replies, but wait longer to start posting. And not a single point of op has been directly addressed.
originally posted by: sk0rpi0n
One christian I know mocked me for handing out money to a beggar saying 'dont encourage beggars'.
Ive known plenty of Christians all y life, and none of them displayed any moral behaviour out of the ordinary....and were far from turning the cheek.
originally posted by: sk0rpi0n
. And not a single point of op has been directly addressed.,
originally posted by: Prezbo369
a reply to: FlyersFan
Maybe the OP is confused as to why Christians (such as yourself) choose to ignore roughly half of the Christian scriptures?
Isn't the old testament the source of Christianity? Would Christianity exist without the old testament?
At least Muslims (like creationists) are consistent with their scriptural beliefs and don't pick on a whim what they choose to believe and what not to.....
originally posted by: flammadraco
originally posted by: Prezbo369
a reply to: FlyersFan
Maybe the OP is confused as to why Christians (such as yourself) choose to ignore roughly half of the Christian scriptures?
Isn't the old testament the source of Christianity? Would Christianity exist without the old testament?
At least Muslims (like creationists) are consistent with their scriptural beliefs and don't pick on a whim what they choose to believe and what not to.....
I actually do not agree with your comments whatsoever. There are plenty of Muslims who have taken from their holy book and translated teachings from Mohammed and misconstrued these teachings to their own ends to suit their own belief systems. I can give you plenty of examples of this but this OP is not about Islam, what it actually seems to be and it seems relatively new to me on ATS is some Muslim ATS members are bashing the Christian Faith.
originally posted by: Prezbo369
Maybe the OP is confused as to why a lot of Christians (such as yourself) choose to ignore roughly half of the Christian scriptures?
Jesus made one statement about the Law that often causes confusion: “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. (NIV, Matthew 5:17–18)
Christians have struggled to understand exactly what Jesus meant. At first reading, this seems to say that all the Old Testament rules and rituals must still be observed. But Jesus and His disciples did not observe many of those rules and rituals, so it could not mean that. It is frequently pointed out that the term "the Law" could have many different meanings at the time of Jesus:1,2
The ceremonial laws including "clean" and "unclean" lists, sacrifices, dietary restrictions, ritual washings, etc.
The civil law regulating social behavior and specifying crimes, punishments and other rules
The moral and ethical laws, such as the Ten Commandments
The Pentateuch (the first 5 books of the Bible)
The scribal law - the 600+ rules formulated by the scribes that everyone was expected to obey
The Scripture as a whole
Jesus did not abolish the moral and ethical laws that had been in effect from the time of Moses. He affirmed and expanded upon those principles, but He said obedience must be from the heart (attitudes and intentions) rather than just technical observance of the letter of the law (Matthew 5:21-22, 27-28, 31-32, 33-34, 38-42, 43-44, etc.).
However, Jesus and His disciples did not observe the strict scribal rules against doing any work on the Sabbath (Matthew 12:1-14, Mark 2:23-28, 3:1-6, Luke 6:1-11, 13:10-17, 14:1-6, John 5:1-18). Neither did they perform the ritual hand washings before eating (Matthew 15:1-2). In contrast to the dietary rules of the Law, Jesus said no food can defile a person; it is bad attitudes and actions that can make a person unholy (Matthew 15:1-20, Mark 7:1-23). Jesus frequently criticized the scribal laws (Matthew 23:23, Mark 7:11-13) and some aspects of the civil law (John 8:3-5, 10-11).
Therefore, Jesus may have been specifically teaching that the moral and ethical laws in the Scripture would endure until the end of time. That would be consistent with His actions and other teachings. Through His teachings and actions, Jesus revealed the true meaning and intent of the Law. It is also pointed out that Jesus, Himself, is the fulfillment of the Law (Matthew 26:28, Mark 10:45, Luke 16:16, John 1:16, Acts 10:28, 13:39, Romans 10:4) The sacrifice of Jesus on the cross ended forever the need for animal sacrifices and other aspects of the ceremonial law.
Asking theological questions or pointing out flaws in doctrine is not the same as bashing a religion. Most christians (the ones regular to the religion forums) however, bash Islam, its people and the prophet in ways that cannot be described as civil discussion. Example, calling Islam violent and backwards because of extremists living in a war torn and impoverished country. Thats like pointing out to the Amish community and declaring all of christianity as backwards and anti-technology. ___________________________________________________ This thread is an example of a doctrinal problem. The question posed is ''did Jesus make the law stricter by upgrading the definition of deadly sins to include normal human emotion and demanding imossibly high moral standards?''. I also asked if believing Jesus died for sins, saves a person who fails to follow Jesus' commands?when i logged in today, i noticed these points have not been directly addressed and instead people are making an issue out of muslims asking questions on theology.
originally posted by: flammadraco
originally posted by: Prezbo369
a reply to: FlyersFan
.....
it seems relatively new to me on ATS is some Muslim ATS members are bashing the Christian Faith.
originally posted by: sk0rpi0n
This thread is an example of a doctrinal problem.
The question posed is ''did Jesus make the law stricter by upgrading the definition of deadly sins to include normal human emotion and demanding imossibly high moral standards?''.
I also asked if believing Jesus died for sins, saves a person who fails to follow Jesus' commands?