It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Arbitrageur
However I do have some respect for their difficulty in learning this, because I think even Einstein struggled with some observations that were inconsistent with the way he expected the universe to be, as evident in his ""I am convinced that He (God) does not play dice." comment, when as far as we can tell, is an example of Einstein not learning the simple lesson you learned.
mbkennel
Wrong questions. RIght questions: what effect does it have on observational properties and how does it fit in the theory which explains other observational properties. Are those justified by experiment?
mbkennel
AnarchoCapitalist
I think you're scared that if EU theory was to be followed and taken to its final conclusion, that we would come to understand that consciousness is not some biochemical by-product. You're afraid science would be forced to admit consciousness is fundamental to the creation of matter. You're afraid we would end up PROVING we are all a part of some God-like being's creation!
Now it comes out.
So it isn't the Electric Universe after all. It's the Electric plus the actual God-particle field (which has arbitrary equations of motion which are experimetnally unfalsifiable).
AnarchoCapitalist
mbkennel
Wrong questions. RIght questions: what effect does it have on observational properties and how does it fit in the theory which explains other observational properties. Are those justified by experiment?
LOL
So you answer my questions by simply calling them wrong.
Greatest answer ever.
And the papers you linked? I don't think it's even possible to count the number of theoretical entities they use to arrive at their conclusions.
Throwing papers at me doesn't change the validity of my statement. The Higgs Field is an aether-like concept.
Why don't you want to answer my questions?
Just tell me how the Higgs field came to exist. I'm all ears. Did God create it? Supposedly you people have determined how all the matter in the universe was produced!
Why can't you tell me how the Higgs field was created?
Bedlam
It's going to be awfully tough to explain away all the experimental data that corroborates GR and SR. Unless, of course, you have access to 'the other physics'.
originally posted by: Nochzwei
That should be if I'm not mistaken beyond your pay scale.
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: Nochzwei
That should be if I'm not mistaken beyond your pay scale.
I'm an engineer for those guys. They feed me equations and half-arsed explanations and I'm supposed to make it do things.
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Lol interesting. Careful though, lest you create some
Paul Daniels kind of box of tricks
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Lol interesting. Careful though, lest you create some
Paul Daniels kind of box of tricks
Hopefully it won't end up like Tom Bearden's 'Pandora's box' surprise. While I have sincere doubts it happened, the visual image has stayed with me for years.
originally posted by: DenyObfuscation
reply to post by Unity_99
The humble pistol shrimp proves conventional science is a joke. And the temperature of the bubble reaches the temperature of the sun's corona, but the claw stays cool. Its cavitation. Keeley's Secret.
Any idea how much actual heat is produced?
Why would you malign the pistol shrimp by implying they use hidden air hoses?
originally posted by: Nochzwei
I googled tom bearden. Apparently he has written a book called oblivion.
All sorts of nutty claims and ideas there
originally posted by: Unity_99
Yes, they've duplicated it and that is called a "star in a jar". Its cavitation. The shrimp emits a shotgun sound, that pierces the bubble, causing the molecules to release energy. which is what the sun's corona is doing. The sun's corona is hot, and all the elements that build our solar system, are created there, reformed an reshaped. The sun itself does not have to be hot.
In a star in a jar, the repeat of this, they put HZ through the bubble.
If you read up on Keely's Secret, and Walter Russel, and various Tesla style scientists and researchers from the past you'd understand why.
Edward Leedskalnin didn't support concepts of electrons. Well who would, in the fairy tale kingdom, an all negative and yet invisibile/weightless, undetectable, because its probably not there, magnet is orbiting an all positive one?
originally posted by: Bedlam
What I Envision Tom's Secret Box Disgorging When Run Empty
originally posted by: Bedlam
a reply to: Nochzwei
I think I recall the story that they managed to corner it and gave a bit of the old ultraviolence with whatever hard objects they had lying about.
originally posted by: mbkennel
I see no essential difference between assuming that an electric & magnetic field exists throughout space which you apparently accept and a quantum field which supports what we call particles which exists throughout space.
It's really hard to figure out what thought process you're using when you say "yes it is cold fusion" and then post a video that concludes that it's not cold fusion.
originally posted by: Unity_99
a reply to: Bedlam
Well yes it is cold fusion.
BBC Horizon - An Experiment to Save the World
Keely's secret was found after his death. He apparently had a big air compressor and hidden air lines all over his lab. Even his benefactor realized he was using air while he was still alive when she found he was using air tubes.
click on show more, such as keely's secret