Only 2 Gun Laws By Obama Total---Both Benefit Gun Owners --0 Guns BANNED in 5.5 Years

Seriously? If you like your guns you can keep your guns...
All you have is a pack of lies. Almost 5 million people lost coverage Jan 1st because of Obamacare. Your numbers count every person who looked at the website as an enrollee.Even when they didn't sign up or put one dime into this farce.The administration keeps pushing back implementation of the ACA until after elections hoping enough people are stupid enough to forget about what an absolute mess it is and vote for these criminals again. Just like when Obama told Putin to wait til after the elections and he could pass legislation weakening America's defenses.

Obama will outright lie to push his own agenda.

and apparently so will you.

Elton

From the link you provided....

It does not appear that any of the executive orders would have any impact on the guns people currently own-or would like to purchase- and that all proposals regarding limiting the availability of assault weapons or large ammunition magazines will be proposed for Congressional action. As such, any potential effort to create a constitutional crisis—or the leveling of charges that the White House has overstepped its executive authority—would hold no validity.

Interesting, and thanks for the link. It appears that there are EO's I would consider good and EO's that I am not so supportive of in the list.

I dunno. None of them sound as benign as they'd like us to think.

"16. Clarify that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes."

That kinda makes my skin crawl, actually.

reply to post by NthOther


These are the one's that do not bother me...

2. Address unnecessary legal barriers, particularly relating to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, that may prevent states from making information available to the background check system.

4. Direct the Attorney General to review categories of individuals prohibited from having a gun to make sure dangerous people are not slipping through the cracks.

7. Launch a national safe and responsible gun ownership campaign.

8. Review safety standards for gun locks and gun safes (Consumer Product Safety Commission).

9. Issue a Presidential Memorandum to require federal law enforcement to trace guns recovered in criminal investigations.

10. Release a DOJ report analyzing information on lost and stolen guns and make itwidely available to law enforcement.

11. Nominate an ATF director.

12. Provide law enforcement, first responders, and school officials with proper training for active shooter situations.

17. Release a letter to health care providers clarifying that no federal law prohibits them from reporting threats of violence to law enforcement authorities.

18. Provide incentives for schools to hire school resource officers.

19. Develop model emergency response plans for schools, houses of worship and institutions of higher education.

20. Release a letter to state health officials clarifying the scope of mental health services that Medicaid plans must cover.

Anyway, thanks again for the list.

Wow this is a RAH,RAH for socialists isn't it.
How can ANYONE capable of RATIONAL thought play up THE most embarrassing administration in AMERICAN history.
He is actually a national security NIGHTMARE and his best skill is his abandonment of accountablity and obfiscation.(Via the Clinton model).If you like him fine,come November lets see how it plays.

reply to post by Skymon612


This thread is an extremely sad attempt at misleading people.

Gun seizures are taking place across the nation, or do you not actually read the news?

Obama, his VP and other administration surrogates and party supporters constantly talk about getting rid of guns.

The second amendment IS under attack, nobody is saying that some of these people actually do genuinely mean well but no matter their intentions, some of them (to some extreme) wish to attack the 2A.

Something was mentioned in the thread title about zero guns . . .



Has that been examined yet?

Zero guns.

Really?

















Everything should be seen in its proper context.

Don't you think?


Mike Grouchy

reply to post by Skymon612


Wrong.

1. The BATFE under the direction of the Obama Justice Dept. banned the importation of 7N6 5.45x39 ammunition.

2. The Obama administration attempted and succeeded to ban the RE-Importation of WW2 era M1 Garands. No one has yet to figure out why, except that Obama has not seen a restriction on gun ownership that he didn't like. His voting record on various bans and restriction while in the Illinois senate are more than sufficient evidence for his record on gun bans.

There are actually several others of these types of bans under the Obama administration's use of executive orders. A ban is a ban. He may not be able to get it through congress, but he certainly will back door it as much as possible.

reply to post by projectvxn

"In my opinion, the M1 rifle is the greatest battle implement ever devised" - General George S. Patton, Jr.

www.thecmp.org...
while i realize the rifle is a bit dated..maybe at a bargain price it could still be common and dangerous
maybe thats why

Obama uses stealth, trickery, deceit, fraud, bribery, and murder to get things fixed his way, and everyone knows how he likes to get his way. And everyone knows how bad he really wants to get those guns. He has said so many times.. So basically you are refuting what the president has already claimed to want to achieve?

I thought you supported Obama.. Switching sides like a lot of people are?

Smart move!

(satirical)

Danbones
reply to post by projectvxn

 

"In my opinion, the M1 rifle is the greatest battle implement ever devised" - General George S. Patton, Jr.

www.thecmp.org...
while i realize the rifle is a bit dated..maybe at a bargain price it could still be common and dangerous
maybe thats why

How does that justify the ban on an American classic?

What's dangerous about it?

And what would possibly be the issue with it being common?

Your response makes very little sense.

That's not totally accurate. John Kerry, the Sec. of State, signed the UN Small Arms Treaty. As did Pres. Obama. This was designed to remove the guns from the United States by the UN. Hot flash, not gonna happen. This needs a majority in the Senate and House.

Didn't NY pass a law against ARs, and the dreaded 10+ round magazines? The gun owners had a choice.
1. Give the gun to the police.
2. Sell the gun.
3. Make the gun permanantly inoperable.
4. Store the gun outside of NY.

The same went for the magazines. I just want to know why you can't open carry in NY. You notice in the cities with the highest crime, are the places law abiding citizens can't have handguns? I think the lawmakers are in bed with the criminal element. Why else would it be illegal to have a gun to protect yourself?
Troy Lawson

NthOther

Elton

EDIT: There could be more, but these are the one's I am aware of.

edit on 7-4-2014 by Elton because: more info

Yeah, there's a lot more:

23 "Gun Safety" Executive Orders

Thank you, though.

Pretty much negates the entire OP.

Bazinga.

I want my 30 magazine clip back.

2nd.

Please don't confuse what he hasn't been able to do with what he doesn't want to do.

The shooters in Aurora and Newtown used the type of semiautomatic rifles that were the target of the assault weapons ban that was in place from 1994 to 2004. That ban was an important step, but manufacturers were able to circumvent the prohibition with cosmetic modifications to their weapons. Congress must reinstate and strengthen the prohibition on assault weapons.

The case for prohibiting high-capacity magazines has been proven over and over; the shooters at Virginia Tech, Tucson, Aurora, Oak Creek, and Newtown all used magazines holding more than 10 rounds, which would have been prohibited under the 1994 law. These magazines enable any semiautomatic weapon to be used as an instrument of mass violence, yet they are once again legal and now come standard with many handguns and rifles. Congress needs to reinstate the prohibition on magazines holding more than 10 rounds.

Source:

"Now is the time to do something about gun violence"
www.whitehouse.gov...

It only takes a moment to find his stance and desires from videos, articles, etc… etc… regarding firearms. So please once again do not confuse what he hasn't been able to do, with what he doesn't want to/wouldn't do.

reply to post by Skymon612


Sorry, but no one is buying it. If there was every any doubt as to what this administration wanted, they made it clear last year. I take it that you slept through last year, because otherwise, you would remember that Obama openly supported the Feinstein bill last year that would have banned over 150 firearms. The only reason you can make that spurious claim is because Congress grew a spine for once and stood up to him after they got so much public backlash. And furthermore, there are the executive orders that others have mentioned as well.

To say that he didn't ban anything is incredibly misleading and a far cry from what he has openly advocated.

Danbones
reply to post by projectvxn

 

"In my opinion, the M1 rifle is the greatest battle implement ever devised" - General George S. Patton, Jr.

www.thecmp.org...
while i realize the rifle is a bit dated..maybe at a bargain price it could still be common and dangerous
maybe thats why

LOL. A gangbanger is going to hide a 10LB, 3 foot long WWII era rifle under his hoodie? Much less even know how to load the thing?

projectvxn

Danbones
reply to post by projectvxn

 

"In my opinion, the M1 rifle is the greatest battle implement ever devised" - General George S. Patton, Jr.

www.thecmp.org...
while i realize the rifle is a bit dated..maybe at a bargain price it could still be common and dangerous
maybe thats why

How does that justify the ban on an American classic?

What's dangerous about it?

And what would possibly be the issue with it being common?

Your response makes very little sense.

edit on pTue, 08 Apr 2014 04:43:46 -050020148America/Chicago2014-04-08T04:43:46-05:0030vx4 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)

Because, as usual for gun-banners, they do not understand anything about the objects they seek to ban.

reply to post by NthOther


From your link:

It does not appear that any of the executive orders would have any impact on the guns people currently own-or would like to purchase- and that all proposals regarding limiting the availability of assault weapons or large ammunition magazines will be proposed for Congressional action. As such, any potential effort to create a constitutional crisis—or the leveling of charges that the White House has overstepped its executive authority—would hold no validity.

Hmm

So even the guys over at Forbes think that maybe the Obama administration is pro gun too.

"but da gubermint iz gunna take mah gunz away! hyuck!"

I hope everyone that has gun go to jail! Criminals included. The more guns people have , the more crime there is. Isnt that why NY has high crime rate?

For everyone else that aprove guns , I hope everyone have Bazookas in their houses and uses them. Laws are made by people that want the laws to help them , not the people. Guns shouldnt exist in the first place. Less weapons , less death. No Weapons No War.

reply to post by Skymon612


it's not because he hasn't tried. remember when he tried to shame congress. do you remember the anger and contempt he and biden had on their faces.

then remember he's got a pen and a phone, that he promised to use.