It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
AnarchistoOfTheNorth
The birds are singing, the grass is green and Yellowstone is gonna kill us all.
Another fine day in America
A 4.8 magnitude quake rocked Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming near the border with Montana, the US Geological Survey said. There were several aftershocks with a magnitude over 3.
The earthquake occurred 37 kilometers northeast of West Yellowstone, Montana at 6:34 am local time (1234 GMT) Sunday.
The quake was centered almost in the middle of Yellowstone National Park, near the Norris Geyser Basin, said Peter Cervelli, a spokesman for the USGS Yellowstone Volcano Observatory, NBC News reported.
He added that any damage from the temblor would likely be minor, noting there are not many visitors in the park at the moment.
There were no immediate reports of damage.
According to USGS there were four aftershocks recorded with a magnitude from 3.1 to 3.3. The USGS said that more are expected.
The secondary shockwaves are usually less violent than the main quake but can be strong enough to do additional damage to weakened structures, the USGS said.
I'm starting to feel as if Mother Earth has finally had enough of our s***.
Well, back to the weather bunker! *tin foil hat mode = ON*
Sourceedit on 3-30-2014 by AnarchistoOfTheNorth because: (no reason given)
esteay812
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
I just checked out that Wind Map, because I thought it looked cool.
It's probably nothing, but I found it somewhat interesting that Yellowstone seemed to be the exact center of the wind in virtually the entire US, east of the Appalachians.
Thinking of it in context with geologic activity, it's kinda creepy.
iamhobo
Yellowstone is not an area like Vanuatu or Chile, with massive earthquakes caused by huge plate tectonics. Those locations compared to Yellowstone are completely different geophysically. Yellowstone sits on a massive caldera (volcano) coupled with smaller faults.
A 4.8 is noteworthy because it isn't being caused solely by plate tectonics --- it's getting back up from a supervolcano.
Drezden
This is normal, It's a very seismically active area, stop fear mongering, this isn't a sign of catastrophe.
Yellowstone National Park was struck on Sunday by a magnitude 4.8 earthquake, the biggest recorded there since February 1980
Drezden
This is normal, It's a very seismically active area, stop fear mongering, this isn't a sign of catastrophe.
reply to post by AnarchistoOfTheNorth
The birds are singing, the grass is green and Yellowstone is gonna kill us all. - See more at: www.abovetopsecret.com...
Drezden
iamhobo
Yellowstone is not an area like Vanuatu or Chile, with massive earthquakes caused by huge plate tectonics. Those locations compared to Yellowstone are completely different geophysically. Yellowstone sits on a massive caldera (volcano) coupled with smaller faults.
A 4.8 is noteworthy because it isn't being caused solely by plate tectonics --- it's getting back up from a supervolcano.
True, however 4.8 is not a large earthquake, and there have been much larger earthquakes in yellowstone in the not too distant past that did not equate to the eruption of a super volcano.
Is this noteworthy? Sure. But I don't agree with the OP's comments in his first post. It's fear mongering and silly.
The quake on Sunday was the most powerful to hit the park since 1985.
dovdov
The good thing about a quake and aftershocks is that it releases the pressure.
Thomas Jordan, director of the Southern California Earthquake Center says experts are studying the recent earthquakes very closely. “We can’t predict earthquakes,” he said, “but you know, I’d say we’re a little bit nervous.” Like Jones, Jordan does not want to see a major quake hit the Puente Hills fault. “It would be very damaging to central Los Angeles,” he said, “An earthquake engineer once told me this could be the earthquake from Hell.” Jordan also says it’s a myth that big quakes — like Friday’s 5.1 in La Habra — release the stress on faults. “They don’t relieve the pressures that cause earthquakes very much and more frequently, they’re actually associated with bigger earthquakes,” Jordan said.
rigel434
I've been surprised how muted the public reaction to this has been. The USGS statement basically acknowledges the quake was caused by uplift at Norris- I thought that would get a big reaction in the media- Drudge headline, etc. It actually deserved a bigger reaction than it got. I believe this to be the most significant event at Yellowstone since the 1959 quake.
Maybe it's just a hardcore group of junkies who really play close attention to this stuff. Jake Lowenstern should start his own private 1-900 number where, for $2.99 a minute, he will tell Yellowstone junkies what's REALLY happening in the park.