It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
rayuki
so how big is it? if it has rings and a possible moon how can it not be classified as a planet??
interupt42
Well this is bizarre, a press conference to make an announcement for a new discovery?
I thought the new way of releasing new discoveries to the public was via a documentary?
Strange the Baltic Sea UFO is waiting to release the documentary first to announce what they found instead of the other way around? Uhm
wildespace
interupt42
Well this is bizarre, a press conference to make an announcement for a new discovery?
I thought the new way of releasing new discoveries to the public was via a documentary?
Strange the Baltic Sea UFO is waiting to release the documentary first to announce what they found instead of the other way around? Uhm
Media companies make documentaries, but the news first needs to be told to Media by scientists.
AutumnWitch657
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
They said at the edge of our solar system . Voyager only took seven years to reach it why would a comet take a million years ?
he team found that the ring system consists of two sharply confined rings only seven and three kilometres wide, separated by a clear gap of nine kilometres — around a small 250-kilometre diameter object orbiting beyond Saturn.
"For me, it was quite amazing to realise that we were able not only to detect a ring system, but also pinpoint that it consists of two clearly distinct rings," adds Uffe Gråe Jørgensen (Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark), one of the team. "I try to imagine how it would be to stand on the surface of this icy object — small enough that a fast sports car could reach escape velocity and drive off into space — and stare up at a 20-kilometre wide ring system 1000 times closer than the Moon."
Although many questions remain unanswered, astronomers think that this sort of ring is likely to be formed from debris left over after a collision. It must be confined into the two narrow rings by the presence of small putative satellites.
ngchunter
InverseLookingGlass
reply to post by ngchunter
An open parabola means the orbital period is infinite. I guess you could say that is long.
You mean parabolic orbit? Those aren't uncommon either, it doesn't take much to perturb a cometary body at Oort cloud distances into a parabolic or hyperbolic orbit.
Open parabola is equivalent to hyperbola. I made no assertion about statistical frequency.
Some external kick had to be involved. I believe that has strong consensus.
Passing stars, dwarf planets, gravitational tidal forces, any number of things. Like I said, it doesn't take much at all, just a few meters per second.
So, according to you, any number of things can cause a virgin comet, in orbit around our sun to re route to the inner solar system for us to see. Can you name one single event that has been directly observed? Name one single "passing star" or name a dwarf planet that has been observed directly altering an orbit of an Oort cloud object. keep it to the ones discovered before your wrote the post. not this one announced today.
I might remind those reading this, that the Oort cloud is prevailing theory, not proven fact. In addition, the source of the gravitational "kick" for "long period comets" could be a large mass object far away or unknown planetesimals orbiting the Sun outside the orbit of the Kuiper belt. In terms of the prevailing model, and observations of comets during recorded history, the large body orbiting the Sun kicking comets in, is more probable. The dynamics and time scale of passing stars just doesn't fit the time distribution of long period comets.
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, and wrong. The source of perturbation could not be "a" large mass object far away, let alone is that "more probable." Try doing your research before promoting ignorance. As I already said, long period comets, including parabolic and hyperbolic comets, come from all directions. So do explain how "a large body orbiting the sun kicking comets in" is more plausible than random perturbations from a variety of sources? It does not fit the facts, it's not even possible. You are trying to force fit a singular cause that you want to believe in, but it does not fit.