It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Quadrivium
benrl
Or it could be something as mundane as a variation in the Ort cloud we did not expect.
Scientist get excited for things, most normal people would shrug at.
Ill hope for something Monumental, but its probably a surprise in minor planetoids (like pluto) or some other abstract concept they have miss calculated.
While advancing human knowledge, does little for the here and now, just trying to maintain perspective.
Nasa press breifings have burned any excitement outta me for these things.
Or it might be that they have actually found evidence that the Oort Cloud exists. It is currently only a working hypothesis. .....correct?
This unexpected result raises several unanswered questions and is expected to provoke much debate. A press conference will be held in Brazil to present the new results and allow opportunities for questions.
Note that all information regarding these findings is under strict embargo until 19:00 CET (15:00 BRT) on Wednesday 26 March 2014.
AutumnWitch657
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
They said at the edge of our solar system . Voyager only took seven years to reach it why would a comet take a million years ?
AutumnWitch657
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
They said at the edge of our solar system . Voyager only took seven years to reach it why would a comet take a million years ?
benrl
reply to post by InverseLookingGlass
Well, there is always the Pioneer anomaly,
Could be that the variance was not an engineering miscalculation from heat venting, and instead a body out there un accounted for.
InverseLookingGlass
reply to post by ngchunter
An open parabola means the orbital period is infinite. I guess you could say that is long.
Some external kick had to be involved. I believe that has strong consensus.
I might remind those reading this, that the Oort cloud is prevailing theory, not proven fact. In addition, the source of the gravitational "kick" for "long period comets" could be a large mass object far away or unknown planetesimals orbiting the Sun outside the orbit of the Kuiper belt. In terms of the prevailing model, and observations of comets during recorded history, the large body orbiting the Sun kicking comets in, is more probable. The dynamics and time scale of passing stars just doesn't fit the time distribution of long period comets.
InverseLookingGlass
benrl
reply to post by InverseLookingGlass
Well, there is always the Pioneer anomaly,
Could be that the variance was not an engineering miscalculation from heat venting, and instead a body out there un accounted for.
I had to go re-read about that. The PA acts like a force vector pointed towards our sun. In other words similar to additional "drag" on the probe, slowing it down.
link to article on pioneer anomoly
It's not clear to me how a mass located outside the radius of the Pioneer could push towards the sun. Anything is possible though. I guess we'll all be looking for the news to pop.