It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: zardust
a reply to: Utnapisjtim
NIce
The monotheism that we now assume as the religion of Israel was in fact a development introduced and imposed by the Deuteronomists as part of Josiah’s purges. Theologically scandalous texts were changed – we know of a group of temple scribes whose role was to remove blasphemies from the sacred writings - and so they altered the ancient Song of Moses, which described how God Most High allocated the nations according to the number of the sons of God and gave Jacob to Yahweh. The Masoretic text says God Most High allocated the nations according to the number of the sons of Israel - which makes no sense, but hid a theologically scandalous reading (Deut.32.8). The Qumran text has the original ‘sons of God’ and the Lxx calls them ‘angels of God’. This ancient poem about the sons of God whose second part described how the Lord became King (Deut.33.5), was attached to the end of Deuteronomy because this was the setting for Deuteronomy, this is what Deuteronomy replaced. Moses brought the law from the presence of God, instead of the Davidic king, the LORD.
The third example of first temple practice that has been obscured is where a non-Deuteronomist describes the enthronement of Solomon (1 Chron.29.20-23). Here, it is the inaccurate English translators who perpetuate the work of the Deuteronomists and give a false impression of this kingship ritual. The AV is accurate and has: ‘All the congregation... bowed their heads and worshipped the LORD and the king’; but the RSV has ‘[They] worshipped the LORD and did obeisance to the king’. The RSV translation has two beings and two verbs, but the Hebrew has one verb – they worshipped – and then just one being: ‘the-LORD-and-the-king’. The LORD and the king were one. As if to emphasise the point, we are then told that Solomon sat on the throne of the LORD as king; in other words, he was the human presence of the LORD. The same usage is found in Revelation, for example in the final scene where the faithful all stand in the holy of holies: ‘The throne of God and of the Lamb shall be [there], and his servants shall worship him’ (Rev.22.4-3). It was one throne on which there was one being who was both divine and human. So too John’s Jesus declared ‘I and the Father are one [thing] (John 10.30).
originally posted by: undo
here's a pair underwater. that's seaweed in the picture. in the distance is an underwater pyramid
originally posted by: undo
maybe copper is symbolic of mars (the planet), gold of the sun and silver of the moon. but what of venus or the earth. lapis for the earth perhaps? things that make you go hmm, hmm, hmmm.
originally posted by: undo
maybe copper is symbolic of mars (the planet), gold of the sun and silver of the moon. but what of venus or the earth. lapis for the earth perhaps? things that make you go hmm, hmm, hmmm.
Amon-Re, King of the Gods, honored in New Kingdom times (Late Bronze Age, 1580-1220 BCE) as the god who helped Egypt conquer Syria-Palestine, in a Portable Throne, from two metal plaques ca. the 6th century BCE, with chest-like shape (like the Ark of the Covenant's chest-like shape), with a striding Sphinx (Hebrew: Cherub) on either side of the throne arms, striding Lions are below the Sphinxes. The god may be standing or sitting within the chest-like throne, it is difficult to say which. An Egyptian goddess enfolds Amon-Re within her outstretched wings. Amon-Re also appears standing as the God Min, "Lord of the East," with flail in his raised right hand.