It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
benrl
reply to post by TritonTaranis
BECAUSE LEGALLY WE HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO.
They are not attacking Nato, it is a dispute between two sovereign nations that we have no part in.
Let the people of those countries deal with it.
I am so sick of these warmongers dressed as patriots clambering to send the Best and Brightest Americans to die on Foreign soil, Yes I am "anti american" for wanting America, to Focus on America.
By minding its business where it should, and not sticking its nose where no legal obligation exist.
edit on 16-3-2014 by benrl because: (no reason given)
lakesidepark
reply to post by benrl
NATO and the U.S. signed an agreement (belarus accord) that the U.S. and NATO would defend Ukraine sovereignity for Ukraine's agreement to dismantle their nuclear missles and warheads.
They did their part and are now defenseless against Russia's trump card. And the west still has an agreement, without action needed from the UN.
You suggest that after stripping them of their defense, the west should ignore that agreement at the time they need that agreement the most?
Good one. You should add that to your west-hating list - that the U.S. will ignore and refuse to help the countries that the U.S has already disarmed and agreed to help. That will be real comforting to all the allies.
the2ofusr1
reply to post by TritonTaranis
Once again ...Russia has not invaded Ukraine and have a agreement with Ukraine to have up to 25000 troops there . They have a base there . And like the above poster said , look at the protesters allowed to protest in Russia .Are they being beaten,pepper sprayed ? your headline is both false and misleading ...
benrl
reply to post by TritonTaranis
THAN they would have to take a resolution through the UN,
and Congress would have to step in.
TO make it legal.
Has that happened?
No.
benrl
reply to post by TritonTaranis
Yes, but the problem being in that agreement the penality for violation of the statement of "assurances" where vague with no force beyond "okay we won't".
Which is why we see no direct unilateral action against Russia by the US, as they didn't violate an enforceable part of it, SO again what do you have?
A treaty with no teeth when it comes to the Assurances, and still needs UN or Congressional approval.
ETA:
Turn off Fox news and take a step back, we have to at least pretend to be a nation that follows laws, and their are legal steps needed to take action, NONE of which have happened.
andy1972
50,000 people protesting....must be costing the American and German governments a fortune....
SLAYER69
Impossible!
The CIA doesn't have 50,000 operatives in Russia.
Western Propaganda
the2ofusr1
reply to post by TritonTaranis
Once again ...Russia has not invaded Ukraine and have a agreement with Ukraine to have up to 25000 troops there . They have a base there . And like the above poster said , look at the protesters allowed to protest in Russia .Are they being beaten,pepper sprayed ? your headline is both false and misleading ...
the2ofusr1
reply to post by benrl
You might have a argument from the Iraqis and the Afghanistan people .The Us is good at usurping the law .The war on Iraq is the one that stands out the most .