It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Roadwolf
I firmly believe the plane is embedded in the seabed. The most organised and well connected criminal mastermind couldn't "steal" a Boeing 777 jet liner with 239 people onboard!
It's hardly like stealing a car you can hide in a garage under a blanket til the heat diesdown. It's not asif you could land it on a beach or even a large field. You'd need perfectly smooth runway, and then refueling capability if as suggested the plane is to be used again for another purpose.
And what would you do with the 239 angry passengers and crew? Where would you hide or dispose of these people? Surely at least one of them would have access to their mobile phone. And mobile phones emit signals....
Which makes me think the aircraft suffered a sudden catastrophic event causing it to plummet, possibly nose dive into the water.edit on 14-3-2014 by Roadwolf because: (no reason given)edit on 14-3-2014 by Roadwolf because: want to add something else...
Vasa Croe
Roadwolf
I firmly believe the plane is embedded in the seabed. The most organised and well connected criminal mastermind couldn't "steal" a Boeing 777 jet liner with 239 people onboard!
It's hardly like stealing a car you can hide in a garage under a blanket til the heat diesdown. It's not asif you could land it on a beach or even a large field. You'd need perfectly smooth runway, and then refueling capability if as suggested the plane is to be used again for another purpose.
And what would you do with the 239 angry passengers and crew? Where would you hide or dispose of these people? Surely at least one of them would have access to their mobile phone. And mobile phones emit signals....
Which makes me think the aircraft suffered a sudden catastrophic event causing it to plummet, possibly nose dive into the water.edit on 14-3-2014 by Roadwolf because: (no reason given)edit on 14-3-2014 by Roadwolf because: want to add something else...
I firmly believe the passenger compartment was intentionally depressurized at high altitude to kill the passengers in their sleep while the hijackers used oxygen. This would explain no calls or texts being sent and the phones still ringing. This plane has been landed somewhere and is under a hangar.
Salamandy
If intended for later use by terrorists then what a well thought out plan.
Now, how does one find a place to land a big plane like that? Hijackers must have friends with lots of land and lots of asphalt to build a landing strip. What a plan if true!edit on 13-3-2014 by Salamandy because: (no reason given)
originally by James Bamford.... (en.wikipedia.org...)
Operation Northwoods, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.
Roadwolf
239 souls onboard. I would imagine 95% at the very least had mobile phones with them. Mobile phones constantly emit a signal. Why have these not been tracked????
(CNN) -- [Breaking news alert, 7:12 p.m. ET]
The U.S. intelligence community is leaning toward a theory that "those in the cockpit" -- the pilots of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 -- were deliberately responsible for whatever happened to the commercial jetliner that vanished, a U.S. official with direct knowledge of the latest thinking told CNN on Saturday.
@AP
BREAKING: Malaysian police say they are examining flight simulator belonging to pilot of missing jet