Interview of Dane Wigington of GeoEngineering Watch

just uploaded a chemtrail picture with this nook, I was gonna just hotlink it, but I can't find that option. anyway, this picture is crazy , the sky is completely covered with chemtrails/SRM.
Don't worry Network Dude, Ol buddy, ol' pal, ol' friend of mine, I'm not upset about the chemtrails, its out of my hands, above my pay grade. Keep up thegreatwork around Ats! helping us see the light...

reply to post by SmikeS


Those look like contrails to me - how can you tell they are "chemtrails"?

SmikeS
If they abruptly stop the SRM(chem trails) it will cause the global tempertures to double, so saith the scientific engineering community ;
Knovel.com

That looks very much like you have bad case of not reading what was actually written - just like this case of a chemmie caught cherry picking quotes to change the meaning.

the article ACTUALLY says

Recent research published by the Institute of Physics indicated that global temperatures would increase by 4 degrees Celsius in the years following a sudden cessation of SRM in a hypothetical scenario. The radical climate change occurred in the model after SRM had been in effect for 25 years starting in 2035, following decades of an extreme emissions pathway.

I don't get myself bogged down with technicalities, one mans Contrail, is anothers Chemtrail (S®m) you ladies are doing a fine job...

reply to post by SmikeS


Here is one I found.



Except mine are contrails. The difference? (I can tell just by looking at them, it's a gift)

SmikeS
I don't get myself bogged down with technicalities, one mans Contrail, is anothers Chemtrail (S®m) you ladies are doing a fine job...

WOW! they are doing all that? do you have some fields near you with the new "reflective leaves"?
I sure would like to see me some of them there.

And you even added more!

Are there any pictures of these "cloud ships"? Or .........(laughing)....Giant space mirrors?
Keep up the good fight sport.

It has been a while since I have laughed this hard on an ATS thread.

What a classic pile on. For all of the usual suspects.....You all get an 'A' for effort. Unfortunately effort is all you bring.

For anyone questioning the credentials of the experts, I would like to ask what your own credentials are. Will those credentials trump those of the experts that you are decrying?

Can any of you prove that geo-engineering on a massive scale using metal oxides is not occurring?

Ever feel like a broken record?

Witness2008
Can any of you prove that geo-engineering on a massive scale using metal oxides is not occurring?

I can, But I would never reveal that kind of information to a reptilian from inner Earth. Now, if you were to say....prove to me you aren't a reptilian from center Earth, I might share what I know.

For your pleasure:

Feel free to debunk anything on this site. wwww.contrailscience.com...
Anything at all.

SmikeS
I don't get myself bogged down with technicalities, one mans Contrail, is anothers Chemtrail (S®m)

err....when did it happen that all contrails are now chemtrails?

I thought there was a difference - chemtrails being a deliberate scheme to create something OTHER THAN normal jet exhaust - whereas contrails ARE normal jet exhaust.

reply to post by network dude


Another good laugh. Thanks

Contrail Science? I did my teething on that site. Kindergarten level propaganda? That's all you've got?

reply to post by Witness2008


Credentials are a red herring, Mary posted a link to an article that claims that on the one hand HBPR engines cannot produce contrails because not enough air is combusted, but on the other hand the aerodynamic contrail from the wing in the picture is genuine where there was no combustion at all.

If you are saying I am wrong in my view that this is nonsense, would you care to explain how that can possibly make sense? You'll notice it's the claim I'm attacking, not the poster or even the claimant. BS debunks itself.

network dude
Keep up the good fight sport.

edit on 18-3-2014 by network dude because: chemtrails are fantasy

Thank you Ma'am , your mother must be very proud of you...

Witness2008
reply to post by network dude

 

Another good laugh. Thanks

Contrail Science? I did my teething on that site. Kindergarten level propaganda? That's all you've got?

So instead of just throwing brickbats about the site, pick some information from it and show it to be wrong then. Put up or shut up is the classic phrase.

Witness2008
It
Can any of you prove that geo-engineering on a massive scale using metal oxides is not occurring?

Can you say argument from ignorance

But as it happens I can provide the same level of evidence that says it is happening - thus proving that it isn't.

It is not happening - there you go - proof positive by your own standards.

Ever feel like a broken record?

I would do but since the same old nonsense "evidence" for chemtrails, SRM, geoengineering blah blah blah keeps coming up time after time and apparently no believers ever cotton onto the fact that it is all BS - so debunking it remains a useful social function.

Aloysius the Gaul

SmikeS
I don't get myself bogged down with technicalities, one mans Contrail, is anothers Chemtrail (S®m)

err....when did it happen that all contrails are now chemtrails?

I thought there was a difference - chemtrails being a deliberate scheme to create something OTHER THAN normal jet exhaust - whereas contrails ARE normal jet exhaust.

In the a Chemmie-English translator "one mans Contrail, is anothers Chemtrail " equates to "I can't answer that point, run away!"

reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul

so debunking it remains a useful social function.

How's that been working for you?

Given the avalanching amount of research and awareness, your efforts have had no affect.

reply to post by waynos

Credentials are a red herring

Credentials are not a red herring. Folks that put such effort towards telling others what they should see and know really should have some type of credentials.

And none of you do.

reply to post by Witness2008


For research and awareness, I presume you mean speculation and guesswork, for that is all there is.

Any chance you might go against the form for the believer religion by addressing direct questions that would support you position if you were able? There are at least two that you're pretending not to have seen.

reply to post by Witness2008


You betray the fragility of your position by insisting on trying to argue who is better qualified, rather than addressing the actual claims and information.

If wigington or any of the others have qualifications in aerospace or meteorology, let's hear them.

Witness2008
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul

 

so debunking it remains a useful social function.

How's that been working for you?

Very well thank you.

Given the avalanching amount of research and awareness, your efforts have had no affect.

Debunking the avalanche of nonsense is gaining a lot of attention, with more and more people acknowledging the chemtrail hoax all the time.

I'm sure you don't see them in the "believer" forums - since they usually block and censor everything they dont' agree with.