ALL MEMBERS, "BASHAR = HOAX Forum" on ATS

Edit to moderate myself.

May as well hoax the Jesus threads while your at it, he walked on water and turned water into wine.

reply to post by jaws1975


Don't need to Religion is code word for ancient Hoax

Bedlam
I didn't know what Bashar was until just now. Man, I wish I was a bit less principled, this looks like easy money.

"I am Tom-ar, from the fifth density. Gather around, put all your money in the basket over there, and I will gift you with a bunch of first semester philosophy dressed up as outer space alien revelations"

Sounds like something Catbert would come up with.

I wish I could star this

reply to post by AnAbsoluteCreation


Words of wisdom

Who's presenting Bashar as a reliable source of info anyway?, the guy/ET brings forward an interesting view point, that's all.
It's up to the individual to discern between fact and fantasy, or is that going regulated for us as well?

Hope ATS doesn't turn into a Nanny Web

By the way, since nothing has been proven either way, shouldn't Bashar be in the "grey area"?

reply to post by AthlonSavage


More interested in his ufology. Had a crush on spock as a kid, thought Captain Kirk was too patriatic and predictable. But have read that the left hemisphere, is spock, the right is kirk, uhura was the communications officer, interface, maybe like a pineal, and the whole ship ran on crystals. Aside from weighing if the ufology was real or vrill. Because we seem to our own problem of fakery on earth. But I still know theres real.

But censorship on issues is to me, like murder, its a huge crime against all souls. It enslaves them and degeneration, anti progression.

reply to post by Springer


So, I take it that we can rest assured that Bashar won't be one of our "Ask Me Anything" guests?

reply to post by Unity_99


You believe in Ickes reptilian talk?

reply to post by AnAbsoluteCreation


Because we don't support total hoaxers, why on Earth would ANYONE want to do that?!

reply to post by Unity_99


One thing I despise is charlatans taking advantage of people's belief systems. It won't happen on ATS if we know about them, we know about this one so he's relegated to the HOAX forum.

Since when is ATS the only site on the web? If you want to read/watch a hoaxer there are dozens of sites his bunk is available on all over the web. ATS just won't be one of them.

jaws1975
May as well hoax the Jesus threads while your at it, he walked on water and turned water into wine.

If someone starts "channeling" Jesus I agree, HOAX it.

I really can't believe the uproar. ATS members can be (edited for T&C).

Make a post saying "Bashar just said reptilians control Congress, what do you think?" 100% fine.
Make a post saying "Bashar just said reptilians control Congress so now it's FACT and we need to revolt or die". Not fine.

reply to post by OccamsRazor04


What's the difference if it is channeling or telling someone they are going to hell if they don't believe in him, same lie right? Your analogy is extreme, I have never seen a post like that, and if there was everybody would laugh. Like an earlier poster said, why not throw them in the grey area and let people have a lively discussion?

jaws1975
reply to post by OccamsRazor04

 

What's the difference if it is channeling or telling someone they are going to hell if they don't believe in him, same lie right? Your analogy is extreme, I have never seen a post like that, and if there was everybody would laugh. Like an earlier poster said, why not throw them in the grey area and let people have a lively discussion?

I made it quite clear what is and is not allowed in my post. If you wish to continue to complain and obfuscate the issue then feel free to do so.

CHANNELING Jesus as proof the Bible is real should be HOAXED. CHANNELING Bashar as proof Bashar is real should be HOAXED.

End of story.

A light intermission is required before more bashar hoaxing lol

reply to post by Springer


Ultimately it is your decision. That much is certain. I have been a happy member here for almost 10 years and the bond that I have with this place is what drives my feedback.

How do we know he is a hoaxer? If there was proof outside the Japanese translator I didn't see it.

If you are just saying, do not support a sensational claim, using bashar as a crutch, wouldn't that be kosher for sag least the "gray area" forum?

AAC.

reply to post by AnAbsoluteCreation

but no one in their right mind would solely believe something based on an unconfirmed telepathic experience.

Really....

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

gardener
Is there a sticked thread that lists all websites that are deemed bogus sources?

At one point management was going to do that ... make a big list for reference.
I think they dropped that idea.
Too bad. It was a GOOD IDEA. I hope they revisit that thought and reconsider making it happen.
I have a list of known hoaxers in the 'I saw Mary/Jesus' area that I'd like to add to it ...

jaws1975
Like an earlier poster said, why not throw them in the grey area and let people have a lively discussion?

Because they aren't the personal story of an ATS Member, besides that you can still have a lively discussion about them in the HOAX Forum, they just won't be getting any search engine boost from ATS.

AthlonSavage
reply to post by Unity_99

 

Your getting negativity and vibratory on me again Unity

William Shatner is an entertainer and a good one in my opinion despite many people considering him B grade. His world of warcraft commercial was funny, be great to see him do an impersonation of Basher.

edit on 28-2-2014 by AthlonSavage because: (no reason given)

I should ask Bill to do one, I'm sure he would LOL.... He's a funny guy, although a little crude at times with the girls which I can take or leave thank you, but he does know how to make something amusing.

This Basher dude doesn't sit right with me but neither does biblical hooey, scientific theory as fact, msm we are required to link to, etc...etc. But for a conspiracy website to declare any topic a hoax is censorship at its finest.