Everything Points to the Solar Micronova

Lets cut to the chase.

Ben is saying that there is a known field of matter of galactic particle that the Solar system passes thru roughly every 12,000 years. The particles have charge and are from other events in the Universe leaving a debris field of sorts. This field has been observed by Astronomers and coincides with the Zodiac. So according to this theory the Solar system passes thru this field on the same spot in the Zodiac. That time is soon.


I will add a thought. Noah was told never again by flood. And this is supposed to cause the Mantle to slip. I think the catastrophe Ben is seeing is based on the Earth flipping every 12000 or so due to the micro Nova hitting Earth and freeing the plates to slip great distances. Einstein made comments on this having apparently happened IIRC his reasoning was based on the ice accumulating more at one pole than the other.

As our sun Sol collects these charged particles on the surface the buildup is blown off in a Mini Nova (explosion).

For me:
I am hoping the we have passed thru this enough that the affect to Sol is nothing as bad as previous adventures thru this dust field I will call it. Either way I am convinced the data is there for the Galactic sheet of particles that we pass thru periodically is disrupting our Solar system. That makes more sense to me than the theory on Planet X and it's Sun Nemesis.

originally posted by: livinglight108
This is a playlist on the 12,000 year cycle: www.youtube.com...

It was the geological records and thru the analysis of the Hubble telescope among others. The Zodiac is 12000 years for instance and happens to fit their theory. The cycle makes sense or I would keep out of it.

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: TzarChasm

The reason I doubt this kinda stuff is that they say "We have evidence it happened 12,000 years ago " and then call it a cycle.

Ok, do they have evidence it happened every 12,000 ? Can they show it happened at 24, 36 and 48,000 years ? If not, then it's not a cycle and just more Doom Porn wrapped up in some scientific sounding jargon.

If they do, then I'll pay attention.

If you go to his site he will list the Peer reviewed data along with his reports. Many of them are very recent as the data is pouring in from all the new Telescopes in space.
Suspicious observer

originally posted by: beyondknowledge
a reply to: livinglight108

I have found information on micro novae but they only occure on the poles of white dworf stars. Our sun is not a white dworf.

Has anyone else found any links to information on this solar micro nova?

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: TzarChasm

The reason I doubt this kinda stuff is that they say "We have evidence it happened 12,000 years ago " and then call it a cycle.

Ok, do they have evidence it happened every 12,000 ? Can they show it happened at 24, 36 and 48,000 years ? If not, then it's not a cycle and just more Doom Porn wrapped up in some scientific sounding jargon.

If they do, then I'll pay attention.

You're correct. There's no 12,000 year cycle. Oh, you can approximate data and force a conclusion but as you say there's nothing 36,000 years ago and certainly not 12 million years ago.

I found a very interesting article on Milankovic Cycles that shows ice ages HAD a pattern of 41,000 years... which was a change from the length of the cycle 800,000 years ago.

It's a pretty neat article and quick read.

originally posted by: Justoneman
Lets cut to the chase.

Ben is saying that there is a known field of matter of galactic particle that the Solar system passes thru roughly every 12,000 years. The particles have charge and are from other events in the Universe leaving a debris field of sorts. This field has been observed by Astronomers and coincides with the Zodiac. So according to this theory the Solar system passes thru this field on the same spot in the Zodiac. That time is soon.

You'd think that this information would be found on astronomical sites - except that it isn't.

There's stuff about Milankovitch cycles. There's information about the Earth crossing the galactic plane. There's pages and pages on comets, comet swarms, wandering planets, etc, etc.

Do you have a link (PLEASE for the love of Mike, not some video. A text site, please.)?

And this is supposed to cause the Mantle to slip. I think the catastrophe Ben is seeing is based on the Earth flipping every 12000 or so due to the micro Nova hitting Earth and freeing the plates to slip great distances.

Ben is making things up (or misunderstanding what he read.) The mantle can't slip. It'd be like... having your skin slip and your sexy bits ending up on the bottom of your feet.

a reply to: Justoneman

The Zodiac is 12000 years for instance

What does that mean, exactly? The zodiac is a band of constellations which sits more or less on the ecliptic, it has no "cycle" but the Sun appears to move through each constellation through a year (12 constellations, 12 months) as the Earth circles it.

Perhaps he is conflating this with precession of the equinoxes. But probably not, since that is a 26,000 (roughly) year cycle which has nothing to do with anything but Earth itself.

No, I'm not going to go to Ben's site because I know he is full of crap. If you like, you can present what you think is his most relevant source and we can discuss it in context.

The 774/775 BC Anomaly Event of Carbon-14 in Treerings and otherwise, the abundance of it, Points to a serious event which occurred, which some speculate will occur again within 10-47 Years based on Radiocarbon dating.

Beyond that, I believe discussion of a solar micro nova is counterproductive as whether it happens or not, Is irrelevant compared to the priority of creating a global IT system that will survive such a disaster. Currently we have nothing. We need to build a system for the evolution of material and consciousness alike, which can survive such a reset.

a reply to: DAVID64

They do have evidence and compiling more and more. AI will eventually be able to get enough data to move the observable universe forward and backward with great accuracy. I think only tree and core samples though but I remember them detailing the evidence going back just over 100 thousand years.

Just won't happen until they start admiting more of electrical aspects and reactions of it all. In my opinion.

a reply to: DAVID64

Well, if you had been here 12,000 years, maybe you would have more experience *sarc*

I actually believe this is unfortunately truly in our upcoming future. Sucks, but on the other hand, it is a great time to be alive simultaneously, IMHO.

EDITED TO ADD:

Considering this angle, penultimate upcoming doom ... I recommend everyone to seize the day in the meantime. Meaning: if there is something that you want to do in your life, it would be best for you to get about doing it sooner, rather than later. We live in a great electrical age of industry and resource exploitation. This planet is currently supporting more modern humans than ever before in our 140,000 year span of existence on this rock, that we can prove (for better, or for worse?). If our time is small, be grateful to be here at all, and best get to enjoying what you / we have left!

None of us can stop a solar micronova, and only a minority would survive, even with the best of preparations....

I like reading about the red dwarf twin to our sun and the planet of reptiles coming to get us. How’s that telescope in Antarctica doing? Any more signs of an 3000 year orbit of the inbound red dwarf star with planet around it ?

originally posted by: wdkirk

I like reading about the red dwarf twin to our sun and the planet of reptiles coming to get us. How’s that telescope in Antarctica doing? Any more signs of an 3000 year orbit of the inbound red dwarf star with planet around it ?

Planet X is old news now after dozens of failed predictions they are going for Micro Nova now. And the same suckers are lapping it up. Ben learned from Nancy Lieder well.

a reply to: livinglight108

Ben is eloquent, and on the right track. He is leading the field forward in our current time, though he stands on the shoulders of the giants in the field of catastrophism that have strode before him, such as this from the Diehold Foundation:

Diehold Foundation Findings

This information has been available (though actively covered up) for a long time, unfortunately.

a reply to: Byrd

It'd be like... having your skin slip and your sexy bits ending up on the bottom of your feet.

That would be a crustal slip. A mantle slip would be more like your musculature rotating beneath your skin and around your bones. Sorry, I can't come up with a simile for that because it makes no sense whatsoever, too.

originally posted by: kerunc1974

originally posted by: wdkirk

I like reading about the red dwarf twin to our sun and the planet of reptiles coming to get us. How’s that telescope in Antarctica doing? Any more signs of an 3000 year orbit of the inbound red dwarf star with planet around it ?

Planet X is old news now after dozens of failed predictions they are going for Micro Nova now. And the same suckers are lapping it up. Ben learned from Nancy Lieder well.

LOL @ PlanetX - That ship sunk long ago.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: Mantiss2021

I didn't notice any doomsday in 2020.

You'll have to be more specific.

that was when Cern opened up the portal to clown world. We have been there ever since.

The LHC was shut down for all of 2020.

The Large Hadron Collider has been Shut Down, and Will Stay Down for Two Years While they Perform Major Upgrades

Are you saying we’re stuck here for at least two years until they get the collider up and running again? I want to go back now!

AGAIN if you want to know. There are peer reviewed papers in his discussions with the links.

a reply to: Justoneman

I would rather not visit his site.
Post the best one. Then we can discuss it. In context.

It simply was to state that it takes 12000 years to cycle thru to return to the same location for our solar system within the Galaxy. This is common knowledge. Scientifically, I am not here to judge the conclusions of people who study the Zodiac. I am just observing and trying to gather more information since this is not my area, Zodiac that is.

You can choose to avoid the facts by staying away from Ben's peer reviewed papers and the ones he discusses each day as he proves or disproves theories on these matters.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Justoneman

The Zodiac is 12000 years for instance

What does that mean, exactly? The zodiac is a band of constellations which sits more or less on the ecliptic, it has no "cycle" but the Sun appears to move through each constellation through a year (12 constellations, 12 months) as the Earth circles it.

Perhaps he is conflating this with precession of the equinoxes. But probably not, since that is a 26,000 (roughly) year cycle which has nothing to do with anything but Earth itself.

No, I'm not going to go to Ben's site because I know he is full of crap. If you like, you can present what you think is his most relevant source and we can discuss it in context.

a reply to: Justoneman

It simply was to state that it takes 12000 years to cycle thru to return to the same location for our solar system within the Galaxy.

How fast do you reckon the solar system is moving in the Galaxy? Seems it would have to be moving pretty durn fast for that to be the case.

Let's try the math, mkay?

We are about 26,000 ly from the center of the Galaxy. That gives us a circular route of 163,363 ly. So to cover that distance in 12,000 years the Solar System must be moving at 13.6 ly/ yr. Gosh, we are traveling way faster than light. Awesome.

You can choose to avoid the facts by staying away from Ben's peer reviewed papers

He has published peer reviewed papers? Can you link some of them?

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: TzarChasm

The reason I doubt this kinda stuff is that they say "We have evidence it happened 12,000 years ago " and then call it a cycle.

Ok, do they have evidence it happened every 12,000 ? Can they show it happened at 24, 36 and 48,000 years ? If not, then it's not a cycle and just more Doom Porn wrapped up in some scientific sounding jargon.

If they do, then I'll pay attention.

if a micro nova repeats on a 12,060 year cycle then how come ice ages last millions-of-years and withstand the heat & bombardments of an exploding Solar 'shell' .... that climaxes each 12.000~ years ?

the theory needs finer tuning.... the 'younger dryas' cosmic bombardment /ice melt/global flooding happened at the same time as the micro-nova event was to take place, but instead of a Sun Mini Nova the cosmic event was a heavy debris field of the Taurid meteor field the Earth orbited into (so say some )