It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
This is why empathy is such an important tool... we must try and understand how our actions make others feel. If all of us go about our lives with a completely self-serving attitude and treat others like crap, it may feel good right now to step all over people in order to earn a vast wealth, but we'd be creating a world where the majority of conscious observers are dealt the short end of the stick, increasing the probability that "I" get dealt a crappy card.
OK.
I got me.
Originally posted by intrptr
Or is this rubbish an excuse for past deeds?
Originally posted by badgerprints
Originally posted by intrptr
Or is this rubbish an excuse for past deeds?
I don't actually believe it myself. It just seemed like an interesting premise with an simple concept and complex result that shows some cosmetic parallels with human behavior.
Is a conjectural discussion based upon a simple idea so offensive that you can only see it as rubbish and imply that I am making some excuse for something you think I shouldn't have done in the past?
Maybe, just maybe, you're taking this a bit too seriously for a "what if" discussion.
I mean, this forum is here for these type of conversations but isn't actually compulsory for any one who finds it offensive.
Is a conjectural discussion based upon a simple idea so offensive that you can only see it as rubbish and imply that I am making some excuse for something you think I shouldn't have done in the past?
Maybe, just maybe, you're taking this a bit too seriously for a "what if" discussion.
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
Honestly though intrptr just try to open your mind for a moment... the subject of consciusness isn't as simple as you believe it to be.
Originally posted by badgerprints
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
Honestly though intrptr just try to open your mind for a moment... the subject of consciusness isn't as simple as you believe it to be.
You guys really do take this stuff a bit too seriously.
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
[qFor example take a look at some modern interpretations of quantum mechanisms... the majority of them involve parallel universes and alternative dimensions or they some how link the conscious observer into the equations, and physicists take these possibilities extremely seriously. The idea of a particle being in multiple place at one time, or travelling through time, or even virtual particles appearing spontaneously from the void and then disappearing back into it. These are accepted and common occurrences within the world of quantum mechanics.
My feeling is that extraphysical dimensions are not stacked next to each other like slices of bread as is proposed by string theory. It is my belief that the initial three dimensions are at the center of a structure of dimensions that wrap around all and connect with each other like the chambers of a nautilus shell.
I don't really have anyone in my life that I can really discuss these esoteric subjects with but I still enjoy reading and thinking about them.
LQG differs from string theory in that it is formulated in 3 and 4 dimensions and without supersymmetry or Kaluza–Klein theory extra dimensions, while the latter requires both to be true. There is no experimental evidence to date that supports string theory's predictions of supersymmetry and Kaluza–Klein theory extra dimensions. In a 2003 paper A dialog on quantum gravity,[74] Carlo Rovelli regards the fact LQG is formulated in 4 dimensions and without supersymmetry as a strength of the theory as it represents the most parsimonious explanation, consistent with current experimental results, over its rival string/M-theory. Peter Woit in Not Even Wrong and Lee Smolin in The Trouble with Physics also regards string/M-theory to be in conflict with current known experimental results.
Loop Quantum Gravity - Gravitons, string theory, super symmetry, extra dimensions in lqg
Originally posted by jonnywhite
reply to post by badgerprints
Thought has crossed my mind. The beauty of not being religious is you can think something like this. People bound to dogma cannot entertain this level of freedom.
But on the other hand, not having a religion is kind of like not having an anchor.
Originally posted by XXXN3O
reply to post by badgerprints
I used to be fascinated with this type of thing and I still am to a certain extent.
I do have to say that there is a certain brilliance in not knowing because if you did figure this whole thing out, it would be a waste of time.
Originally posted by Sandalphon
There is a bunch of some that say we invented this world to interact with one another. Maybe it's called Elohim, in the "we" sense. But there is another layer of being where there exists others, and how it manifests is rather interesting, as though we all came from the stars.
I guess it depends on the definition of "person".
Just imagine the ones that have already crossed that boundary of what "this place" is.