It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
IT HOWEVER SEEMS THAT SOME PEOPLE THINK MINORITY RACE SHOULD TAKE PRIORITY OVER EVERYTHING ELSE.
I see no reason why anyone would require a reason to be racist: if a person feels that they need a reason to be racist, then they could not be racist. My point has always been that there is only so much money and attention, and that there are better, more important things to focus on.
I truly believe that if a thread was started saying that all first born children would die over the world and the only proven solution was to shut the race relations organizations, people would say you can't do that, millions of people will have to die. You could probably increase that and say a billion would die and still people would say no race is important and a quarter of the worlds population will have to perish.
I truly believe that if a thread was started saying that all first born children would die over the world and the only proven solution was to shut the race relations organizations, people would say you can't do that, millions of people will have to die. You could probably increase that and say a billion would die and still people would say no race is important and a quarter of the worlds population will have to perish.
Originally posted by s12345
So a person under dying isn't allowed any moral justification for any of their actions. Then why could such a situation be a defence in court. A person drunk or ill enough does not have to abide by any contracts made when in this state: verbal of otherwise; therefore a person ill could not be held to account for anything said when in such a state. Morally the law is right, an ill person has more mobility than a person not drunk.
Originally posted by s12345
I agree I just think the very ill or those in tremendous pain should morally be given a little lley way as regards to behaviour. It makes bad behaviour morally less wrong. I would like to point out though that not caring is not the same as being bigoted it is just not caring.edit on 17-3-2012 by s12345 because: (no reason given)