It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Screwed
reply to post by john_bmth
Yeah, I think we all know where you stand on the subject now so,..........thanks for your input.
Rather than get my information from ONE source who says "Don't waste your time, it can't be done"
I am going to listen to the people who HAVE tried and gotten results.
I am not opposed to the idea of increasing my gas milage using HHO as a suppliment.
Apparently YOU ARE!
That's cool with me though.
To each his own.
I appreciate your input though.
It appears that there is no way to produce ENOUGH HHO using the cars alternator, to run the car, from what you are saying. But it could produce SOME!
Some is better than NONE!
My ears are still open and I am willing to learn more because I don't claim to know it all nor do I pretend to.
I know what I was told was possible all my life but I also have reason to believe I may have been either lied to
or given information that is innacurate by people who themselves were only "repeaters" for the information that they were given.
I am ready to find out for myself.
AFTER I find out for myself, I will report back and then you can tell me that what I found out is not possible
and you will be allowed to remain safely in your bubble and I will be allowed to explore the possibilities that you were afraid to explore. Everybody wins!!
Originally posted by Screwed
reply to post by SavedOne
Last time I checked,
water was the most abundant natural resouce on the face of the planet.
Correct me if I am wrong.
Originally posted by EmilNomel
you said it perfectly... "Some is better than NONE!"
we are not talking about a perpetual motion machine (which is impossible according to modern physics)
the closed minded one here thinks that we are claiming this technology as a perpetuum mobile.
he's holding some kind of grudge against All these "free energy" threads... now i see why he was so hostile towards me
i am glad that your ears are open to all of the possibilities... we could have been deceived or given inaccurate information is very possible!
please don't forget to report back on what you find out for yourself!
i will be looking forward to your findings...
and good luck with your experiments
Originally posted by Sytec
our governments and the oil/gas company's would stop at nothing to ensure we don't have these technologies, be careful if you get one working.
Reading your post is all the proof I need it doesn't work...
Originally posted by autowrench
Do your research before posting that something you now nothing about won't work, please?
Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by autowrench
For the millionth time already: You will spent more energy splitting the hydrogen than you will get back as fuel. If you believe otherwise, by all means present your findings to the scientific community for scrutiny and collect your Nobel prize before joining the mortal ranks among the likes of Newton and Einstein.
Originally posted by Sytec
in the early 1980's GM mada a car which was electric and didn't need recharged,
It took the NiMH-equipped cars as much as eight hours for the cars to charge to full capacity (though an 80% charge could be achieved in between one and three hours)...The home charger provided by GM, which was required for "fast recharging" of the car, measured roughly 1.5 by 2 by 5 feet (0.45 x 0.60 x 1.50 m), and featured integrated heatsinks and a resemblance to a gasoline pump.
in the mid 1960's there was a water based car called hydro, the car now sits inside a museum
the designs are patented
in the 1990's in larkhall, scotland, an inventer designed a spark plug replacement which would allow a car to run on any type of water
both these cars are currently banned from sale everywhere except japan, you aren't even allowed to import one, the car manufacturers weren't even allowed to import one as a demonstration of the technology.
The FCX Clarity FCEV is officially out on the road. A limited number of these groundbreaking vehicles are currently being leased to select Southern Californians.....Ron Yerxa and Annette Ballester took delivery of the first hydrogen fuel cell powered FCX Clarity FCEV on July 25, 2008 at Honda of Santa Monica....Therefore, only customers currently residing in the Torrance, Santa Monica and Irvine areas who meet additional qualification criteria were eligible to take an FCX Clarity FCEV home. Honda wants to ensure that FCX Clarity FCEV drivers will be able to take their vehicles in for service at participating dealers and have convenient access to refueling stations.
You're not making any sense at all my friend.
Originally posted by EmilNomel
reply to post by Arbitrageur
the point is to save the gas use per mile and not to replace it completely with water which perhaps could be possible one day in the future...
i will say this again for the last time, we are not talking about a perpetual motion machine here!
And in that case you would NOT need gas, you could do what the OP suggests. But nobody is doing that because it's not possible by any means we know of.
Perpetual motion describes hypothetical machines that operate or produce useful work indefinitely and, more generally, hypothetical machines that produce more work or energy than they consume
Originally posted by autowrench
reply to post by john_bmth
The hell with the "scientific community." I will just continue to drive my big, heavy van with it's big, V-8 engine, and will get better mileage every time I alter it. We are working on a plate design right now. You can keep believing that, and keep feeding Big Oil all you want to, but don't say it won't work unless you ave tried it. I see your kind all the time, they see my "Hybrid Chevy" sign and shake their heads as they walk away, and then more people come up, take pictures, ask questions, and make drawings so they can save some money too. There are now four people in my little town running one on their vehicle. So, if it won't work, then why are people doing it?
after a while this water vapour attacks the piston and valve heads :- deteriorating the surface area. the only way to stop this is to strip your engine down and have the pistons and valves heads coated with a ceramic layer, which incidentally doesn't come cheap.
Reading your post is all the proof I need it doesn't work... You're still using gas. If it worked as you claim, you wouldn't need gas, you could run your car on water. So you're proving it doesn't work without any help from me.
I can find a lot more than 4 people praying to various and sundry supernatural beings, like maybe 4 billion. So what does that prove?
Originally posted by autowrench
There are now four people in my little town running one on their vehicle. So, if it won't work, then why are people doing it?
Originally posted by autowrench
reply to post by john_bmth
The hell with the "scientific community." I will just continue to drive my big, heavy van with it's big, V-8 engine, and will get better mileage every time I alter it. We are working on a plate design right now. You can keep believing that, and keep feeding Big Oil all you want to, but don't say it won't work unless you ave tried it. I see your kind all the time, they see my "Hybrid Chevy" sign and shake their heads as they walk away, and then more people come up, take pictures, ask questions, and make drawings so they can save some money too. There are now four people in my little town running one on their vehicle. So, if it won't work, then why are people doing it?
Chemical symbol
Deuterium discharge tube
Deuterium is frequently represented by the chemical symbol D. Since it is an isotope of hydrogen with mass number 2, it is also represented by 2H. IUPAC allows both D and 2H, although 2H is preferred.[2] A distinct chemical symbol is used for convenience because of the isotope's common use in various scientific processes. Also, its large mass difference with protium (1
H) (deuterium has a mass of 2.014102 u, compared to the mean hydrogen atomic weight of 1.007947 u, and protium's mass of 1.007825 u) confers non-negligible chemical dissimilarities with protium-containing compounds, whereas the isotope weight ratios within other chemical elements are largely insignificant in this regard.
Originally posted by EmilNomel
reply to post by Arbitrageur
the point is to save the gas use per mile and not to replace it completely with water which perhaps could be possible one day in the future...
i will say this again for the last time, we are not talking about a perpetual motion machine here!