It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Globally, fish provides more than 1.5 billion people with almost 20 percent of their average per capita intake of animal protein, and 3.0 billion people with at least 15 percent of such protein.
Wild salmon require so much work: they need clean water, a bountiful ocean and restraint to ensure that they aren’t fished out of existence. Vigilance, and a small amount of sacrifice — what a drag.
Originally posted by seenitall
Something slightly more on topic...
Check out the FAO website and have a look at how much of the world's population rely on fisheries (and increasingly so over time) for food.
FAO World Review of Fisheries and Aquaculture 2010
Globally, fish provides more than 1.5 billion people with almost 20 percent of their average per capita intake of animal protein, and 3.0 billion people with at least 15 percent of such protein.
Then you have GM Atlantic Salmon. While I'm not 100% against GM foods, I often wonder how many people actually think that is a viable solution. Its yet another case of treating the symptoms and not the cause.
The problem with genetically modified salmon
Wild salmon require so much work: they need clean water, a bountiful ocean and restraint to ensure that they aren’t fished out of existence. Vigilance, and a small amount of sacrifice — what a drag.
edit on 22-6-2011 by seenitall because: (no reason given)
Oh, World famine wouldn't be such a problem if people recognised also what they could eat around them. During plagues of locusts, locusts themselves are highly nutritious, espeecially because they eat the grain, and take that nutrition inside them and break it down into something more readily eaten and absorbed by our own body.