It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cupocoffee
Maybe it will work, maybe it won't. We cannot know for certain unless we test.
Originally posted by cupocoffee
It is all of you who jump to conclusions and assume it doesn't work - without doing any testing.
Now is that proper Scientific Method, to start by assuming it doesn't work, and then refuse to test it? I don't know....
Originally posted by cupocoffee
What evidence? RogerT's posts?
RogerT did not buy one of the kits - he built a SchoolGirl Motor. Totally different unit than the 10-coil kit.
Originally posted by cupocoffee
The SchoolGirl Motor does not output enough power to power a house - nor did they ever claim that it does.
I bet you the 10-coil unit does output enough power though....
Originally posted by coolhanddan
reply to post by cupocoffee
James,
can you explain this quote
On May 26, 2011, Dr. Steven E. Jones demonstrated a simple solid state circuit he has been working on that produces more than eight times more energy out than is electrically put in, implying that energy is being harvested freely from the environment somehow. He shows the results he has gotten both from his oscilloscope as well as a high-end Techtronics oscilloscope he used at Brigham Young University where he served as a Professor.
if he uses the word energy and not the word power, would this change your line of thinking below?
Originally posted by deezee
And while we're at the subject of refusal, i would like to remind you, that it's the inventors themselves, who are refusing to offer any proof their devices are working. Something, that should be part of their job!
- What then is the reason anyone should put down $4000 of their own money to do something the inventor should himself - prove that it works? With a $4000 price tag, there must be a reason, i would hope...
I never asked for something that can power a house. All i was asking for, is something that produces more power than it uses - so called over-unity. Doesn't even need to have 800% efficiency - i'd be happy with ANYTHING over 100%.
Show me something, that can power itself plus an LED, and i'll be all over it! I would immediately want to try and find ways to make it more powerful, or somehow scale it, and even if i couldn't, i would still have a thousand and one uses for it! I get excited just thinking about it! If only we had a basic proof of concept, even if it could only just power itself at the start, i guarantee you, it would open the floodgates and people would find ways to improve on it.
You said you bet it can power a house... You willing to bet, say $4000?
Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by RogerT
What are you powering with your over-unity device? A 1 word answer will suffice.
Originally posted by deezee
I was referring to RogerT's attempt, when i said "in this thread", yes, but he's not the only one. He put a valiant effort into it, but unless i'm mistaken, it is not doing, what it's supposed to... From what i saw, the only results were some confusing readings, which may or may not indicate something in some peoples opinions, but i fear an experienced electronics engineer could explain the readings, if they had direct access to the device and a good scope.
Originally posted by cupocoffee
What more can they be reasonably expected to do to prove it, beyond the books, videos and kits?
Bedini has the best reputation of anyone in alt energy.
He has patents, he has books, he has videos, he has an open-source kit. He has his Yahoo group where he has people replicating his work.
No one else is even offering an open-source kit yet besides Bedini and Friedrich - therefore, this kit is the correct choice, by default.
Now, if anyone else has a better plan that they can put on the table, I'd be glad to hear it! But, if not - then going with the Bedini kit is the correct plan.
Okay, how about the Prof. Steven Jones modified Joule Thief circuit then? It's open-source too and the experiment would barely cost anything to try....
Originally posted by cupocoffee
Refusing to offer proof?
What do you call the two books where they disclose the circuits and schematics, the "Energy from the Vacuum" video series, the open-source kits?
What more can they be reasonably expected to do to prove it, beyond the books, videos and kits?
Originally posted by cupocoffee
The reason is, if you do the research, Bedini has the best reputation of anyone in alt energy. He has patents, he has books, he has videos, he has an open-source kit.
Originally posted by cupocoffee
He has his Yahoo group where he has people replicating his work.
Originally posted by cupocoffee
No one else is even offering an open-source kit yet besides Bedini and Friedrich - therefore, this kit is the correct choice, by default.
Originally posted by cupocoffee
Show me something, that can power itself plus an LED, and i'll be all over it!
Okay, how about the Prof. Steven Jones modified Joule Thief circuit then? It's open-source too and the experiment would barely cost anything to try....
I am willing to throw down the $4000 for the unit, but I don't have any engineers, equipment, nor a lab to test in. If someone like you or RogerT can handle all that, you just might have a deal.
Originally posted by cupocoffee
Oh also, I would want my own witnesses and camera crew present during the testing too. You would have to be willing to allow other engineers to double-check and triple-check your work; everything would have to be 100% transparent so there's no chance of trickery.
Originally posted by spoor
Show a working version that has been properly tested.... which they are unable too do!
Originally posted by RogerT
You should start a thread titled:
If I buy this $4000 Free Energy kit, is there anyone on ATS willing to build it and test it?
I think you will get one or two takers. there are some very good technical souls on here who are also practically competent and also potless. If the money aspect were handled, they'd probably be in.
Personally I don't have a lab. I'm not an electronic engineer or any other kind of qualified professional in the field.
PS. I personally felt Bedini tech wasn't the way to go and still don't. Crystals, consciousness and vortex tech is now my gut feel on where to put my attention.
Originally posted by deezee
Instead, what i could do myself, without too much trouble, is build the modified joule thief circuit you mentioned. But it would only make sense, if it is claimed to be capable of powering itself, not just the LED... However if it actually creates 8 times as much power as it uses, that should be no problem whatsoever!
He explicitly states in the video that he's had the design replicated by several other people.
Ask the people living near Fukushima or Chernobyl what they think of radioactivity as a power source:
Originally posted by Pervius
Nathan Stubblefield was an amazing American inventor who created a simple battery you burry in the ground, the "Earth Battery"...it ran the telegraphs across America years ago. He died poor and hungry....but his invention is coming back to the world.
Actually it sounds like the radioactivity probably killed their son Tesla. Of course the source is Keelytech so I don't know if it's that reliable.
The discovery that there was radioactivity involved in Stubblefield's earth batteries puts an entirely different complexion on the matter....
I have to go back to my earlier post, I have just remembered something which might be of importance here. When talking about Stubblefield contaminating the earth I quoted:
o o It wasn't until 1906 when their son Tesla died teething on a potato from one of the RF antenna "hotspots," -- that they realized that it could have been the RF antenna "hotspots," mixtures of Pitchblende, salt crystals and other active metals that created the healthy looking but tainted vegetable gardens.
I missed it on the first reading through but then I remembered what Pitchblende is. It is an old fashioned German term for a mineral that is now known as Uraninite.
IT IS RADIOACTIVE !
The joule thief circuit adds losses that don't exist without it, it's actually inefficient. You'll use less energy without it.
The Joule Thief circuit those boys created will revolutionize lighting this planet....with barely any power.
Yeah, when it was only implicit, I thought it was dubious, but since he's been so explicit now, let's put our doubts to rest!
Originally posted by boncho
Well since he explicitly stated that other people have done so, we surely must believe him now. Off to the Free Energy Mobile! I will travel the nation and let everyone know, all the while sucking energy out of the energy-doe-sphere.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
The joule thief circuit adds losses that don't exist without it, it's actually inefficient. You'll use less energy without it.