It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
I read it. i understood what you were responding to.
I stand by my statement ... dozens of fans? Don't flatter yourself.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Hardly. Just have you "pegged".
The reality is that you got caught - along with many others here - trying to using this tragedy to continue your attacks on Palin and other conservatives.
Then when the spotlight was shined on you exposing your terrible cynicism, you tried the old liberal tactic of trying to squirm out of it by saying things like "that's not exactly what I said", and "that's not exactly what I meant", etc., when your meaning was quite clear. Others even responded to you and gave your posts a few stars. In other words, they got your meaning, as well.
If you really believe all the BS you've been spouting, at least have the courage to stand behind your words.edit on 1/12/2011 by centurion1211 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by centurion1211
reply to post by Sinnthia
This thread should put an end to the assertions you and others here have made regarding Palin's role in somehow "influencing" the shooter to commit these horrific crimes.
Next ...
Originally posted by Sinnthia
Originally posted by centurion1211
reply to post by Sinnthia
This thread should put an end to the assertions you and others here have made regarding Palin's role in somehow "influencing" the shooter to commit these horrific crimes.
Next ...
You have shot your credibility through the basement today with nothing but lies about me. You accuse me of saying things I never said and when I ask for quotes you run off. Please show me where I ever blamed Palin for influencing this shooter. A real man would admit when he is wrong instead of just repeating the error over and over and over.
Originally posted by Sinnthia
reply to post by deanyo
On the contrary, I feel this only serves to highlight that for years now people have been saying that Palin's words are dangerous. All the people rushing out to defend her in light of recent events are doing an amazing job of missing the fact that this is not a new complaint against Palin. I guess we all just want to wait until someone does shoot someone in her name before she learns to talk like a grownup.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Asked and answered.
Good advice for you going forward: When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging!
Now let's move on to more relevant facts ...
Originally posted by centurion1211
Asked and answered. Your meaning was quite clear. "Palin's words are dangerous" and "not a new complaint against Palin". There is only one way to interpret what you said.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by Sinnthia
reply to post by deanyo
On the contrary, I feel this only serves to highlight that for years now people have been saying that Palin's words are dangerous. All the people rushing out to defend her in light of recent events are doing an amazing job of missing the fact that this is not a new complaint against Palin. I guess we all just want to wait until someone does shoot someone in her name before she learns to talk like a grownup.
Originally posted by Sinnthia
Originally posted by centurion1211
I really do not know how to make this any more clear to you.
Originally posted by Sinnthia
reply to post by deanyo
On the contrary, I feel this only serves to highlight that for years now people have been saying that Palin's words are dangerous. All the people rushing out to defend her in light of recent events are doing an amazing job of missing the fact that this is not a new complaint against Palin. I guess we all just want to wait until someone does shoot someone in her name before she learns to talk like a grownup.
You picked a really bad quote to make your case with as it actually says the exact opposite of what you claim I said. Give up.
Originally posted by centurion1211
And on another thread responding to ATS moderator projectvxn you were defending the Huffington Post, which did specifically try to put the blame on Palin. What I also found out scanning through the search is that you must be the most misunderstood person here on ATS. I saw several instances of you claiming not to have said or meant something - as you are now doing here on this thread. That makes the common denominator in this discussion you and not me.
Done . There are too many other issues of far more importance than your silly attempts at "reputation defense" going on now that demand our attention.
Originally posted by Sinnthia
That is your copout?
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by Sinnthia
That is your copout?
Hardly.
I have simply decided to no longer help you in deflecting this thread.
Originally posted by centurion1211
If you really believe all the BS you've been spouting, at least have the courage to stand behind your words
Originally posted by Sinnthia
Luckily it is quite clear I am not the only one seeing through this.edit on 12-1-2011 by Sinnthia because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Sinnthia
Palin: Obama pals around with terrorists
Palin began the campaign by painting her political opponent as a very literal enemy of the state. That is not an appropriate use of your platform in American politics. She painted him as someone guilty of treason. Couple that with the birther rumors and all the gun talk and Palin has more than made her own bed here. Now that she has taken today to cry about what a victim she is in all this while comparing it to genocide justifications, I think she has all but forfeited any forthcoming apology for any assigned blame.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I am ashamed to say that I failed here. Terribly. And now, reading it, I will correct that behavior immediately.