It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Modern man may have been in existence 400k years ago. If this is indeed proven fact then how far a stretch is it to believe that the theory that Annunaki intervened in the evolution of modern man, some 450k years ago?
Originally posted by rebeldog
reply to post by WingedBull
basically it has as much "proof" as anything in the bible no?
secondly it is way more logical than a malevolent being throwing a supposed temper tantrum because of eve's quest for knowledge.
Originally posted by St Udio
Well, archeology sleuths have discoverd modern human teeth in a cave...
the tooth is twice the age that modern man is known to exist...
www.npr.org...
Professor Avi Gopher from the Institute of Archeology of Tel Aviv University
holds an ancient tooth that was found at an archeological site near Rosh Haain,
central Israel, Monday, Dec. 27, 2010. Israeli archaeologists say they may
have found the earliest evidence yet for the existence of modern man.
Archaeologist Avi Gopher says further research is needed to solidify the claim.
If it does, he says, "this changes the whole picture of evolution."
media.npr.org...
so modern humans created by offworlders to mine gold were around 450,000 years ago already...
that view is contrary to today's Anthropologists who say homo sapiens-sapiens began only 250,000BCE
===if the 450k bce is proven right, then the annanuki legend may well be correct, we were made as slavesedit on 29-12-2010 by St Udio because: forgot a 2nd stroke in addressedit on 29-12-2010 by St Udio because: frig it, the tooth image is the 3rd on the site linked
Originally posted by St Udio
reply to post by Blarneystoner
so..... disinterested archeology digs, sponsered by Universities, had an agenda to produce a very ancient tooth that could, theorectically, lend support to ancient Annanuki & modern human contact...
and thats' 'propaganda' ?
they have no reason to confirm or give any fringe acceptance of humans being a stand-alone, thriving branch of the human Tree... that would undermine the principal of the special-ness of any ethnic groups' heritage.
i think your just blasting me for the sake of making noise
Stitchin has a great imagination but that's all it is. Nibiru doesn't exist and the Sumerian myths aren't that old, It's highly unlikely that the history of this so called alien intervention survived for over 440,000 yrs. It's a great story and would make a really cool Sci-Fi movie or a subject for the Ancient Aliens series on the History channel but that's all it is, fantasy, no basis in reality whatsoever....
Originally posted by esteay812
reply to post by Blarneystoner
"propaganda"
Can you give any published information that shows any of what you say to be truth?
I am not showing any of what I have posted as truth, but at least I am not bashing those who speculate with their opinions and the topic is presented with factual evidence.
Can you present any factual evidence to go along with your name calling, fun making, and general lack of dis-respect for your fellow ATS members? I would love to see it, really.
Really? You think that one tooth found in a cave is enough to confirm that whacky theory? Seriously?
Gawd... doesn't anyone else see this for what it really is????
Oh I see... your assertion is based upon the belief that 223 genes in human DNA, whose origins seemingly cannot be accounted for in the genetic evolutionary record, are alien in origin.
Too funny
You're just whining now
Originally posted by esteay812
Can you present any factual evidence
Originally posted by esteay812to go along with your name calling, fun making, and general lack of dis-respect for your fellow ATS members? I would love to see it, really.
Originally posted by esteay812
reply to post by Harte
I did present factual evidence in the form of the article linked..
Originally posted by esteay812
Is it because it is something you do not understand that you find it frivolous? Do you fully understand it and know something that others and myself might not that allow you to know the absolute fact that anything pertaining to this is bunk or are you just going on because you you are of the opinion it is bunk? If you do have this information, can you please share it - outside of opinion?
It has been written and talked about for many years and I am sure that many people would love to see solid evidence to conclude the topic in favor of or against the ideas presented.
Originally posted by esteay812
reply to post by Blarneystoner
I don't find the way you debate particularly intensive. In fact it is quite mediocre, given the slants you use to belittle members, their posts, and opinions... Here are the examples you requested... from this page alone...
Really? You think that one tooth found in a cave is enough to confirm that whacky theory? Seriously?
Gawd... doesn't anyone else see this for what it really is????
Oh I see... your assertion is based upon the belief that 223 genes in human DNA, whose origins seemingly cannot be accounted for in the genetic evolutionary record, are alien in origin.
Too funny
You're just whining now