It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by aching_knuckles
How can you even try to make this point in this economy? The tax cuts have been in effect for nearly a decade, and in that decade we lost jobs.
The Republicans fought to allow the top 1% of our populations money to not be taken. They fought not for the middle class, in fact the Republican idea was to just keep the Bush tax cuts on ONLY that 1% and have EVERYONE ELSE pay for it.
So unless YOU, WTFover, are in that 1%, you are arguing against your own best interests. Which is usually the case of people who vote Republican.
The money that the Republicans "saved" for those who least need it could keep alot of unemployed people from literally losing their homes, families, health, and even lives.
Originally posted by Killface
It is easier than you can believe for this quasi-fascist government monster to continue to pillage us for all we are worth, when we are too busy arguing whether or not the right claw or the left claw is more dangerous.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
That was a necessary evil -- more than somebody's posh lifestyle was at stake. Collapse of automakers would really send waves of massive and permanent unemployment through the country, etc.
Originally posted by WTFover
Actually, the unemployment numbers were relatively steady for the first eight years, following the tax cuts.
2001 4.7 %
2002 5.8
2003 6.0
2004 5.5
2005 5.1
2006 4.6
2007 4.6
2008 5.8 www.bls.gov...
I'd be curious to read anything you have substantiating this claim. It is my understanding the entirety of the current tax rates were the goal of the Republicans, until the Democrats decided to play political games with them, by lumping in the increase in unemployment benefits and allowing tax increases on the job creators.
And, I most definitely am not a top 1%er. But, I do think the Republicans are on the right side of this issue.
The great majority of those currently receiving unemployment benefits, don't want extensions. They want jobs. And, people receiving unemployment benefits don't create jobs.
Originally posted by Killface
reply to post by aching_knuckles
I am doing something, I did propose a solution. I have taken it upon myself to spread factual information both online and in my everyday life, I am trying to get the word out and open peoples eyes from the dream that electing an official is going to bring real change.
You accuse my of not proposing a solution, and in your post say a compromise would be necessary, something I said much earlier in this thread. My solution is to rally Americans to treat each other as allies, rather than the enemy.
I am also doing my part to promote local economy and starve the corporate beasts, by buying only local products.
I believe this to be far more effective than arguing red vs. blue, and voting more criminals into office.
Originally posted by aching_knuckles
From Obamas speech the other day...you did actually listen to it or read it, didnt you?
The Republicans wanted to let the tax cuts expire on everyone except the top 2%, and wanted to repeal the Obama tax cuts.
They also refuse to sign off on UE unless they get the tax cut for the top 2%.
Why? you would be agreeing that the top 2% should keep their money, and agree to pay more tax yourself.
Raising the direst alarm yet, the Obama administration warned fellow Democrats on Wednesday that if they defeat the big tax-cut compromise detested by many liberals, they could jolt the nation back into recession.
Originally posted by WTFover
Seriously? You quote politi-speak from Obama as proof "the Republicans wanted to let the tax cuts expire on everyone except the top 2%". Come on... You know that isn't going to work.
Again... Seriously? Just because the Dems try to use that tactic to promote class warfare, doesn't mean you should insult my intelligence with it. There is no "tax cut" for the top 2%. It is an attempt to maintain the tax rates at the current levels. Also, the dishonesty in that claim is astounding. The only reason the Dems lumped the two issues together was to manufacture a political football. Another typical tactic. Why didn't they separate them and give them each their own vote, if they were serious about doing what is best for the people?
You really must provide proof of claims, such as this, if you are to have any hope of converting me to your position. Where do you get that anyone, Dem or Rep, is seeking a tax increase on the middle class? But, remember, proof is a Republican saying it. Not a Democrat saying that is what the Republicans want.
And, why do you continue to the ridiculous politi-speak of misidentifying the debate as the wealthy not paying more than their fair share of the tax burden. No one is saying they want the "top 2%" to keep all of their money.
The Democrats are hypocrites when it comes to Middle Class tax cuts
Originally posted by Killface
reply to post by aching_knuckles
Are you implying that democrats ARE in touch with 95% of America? Also that they are not hypocritical?
If you refuse to see the flaws in your political party of choice, no amount of numbers or evidence will make any difference to you.
Is it so hard to believe that democrats don't have your best interest at heart? If they restructured the economy, do you really believe they would make you prosperous? They are still politicians and human, and will get theirs and make sure their friends get theirs too before they consider the lower classes. They would simply do it in a slightly different fashion.
End the fed, cut our interventionist military's budget, stop borrowing trillions of dollars...these are the real steps towards progress, and guess what, these issues are colorless.
Originally posted by WTFover
reply to post by aching_knuckles
By the way, have you noticed Obama is now on board with keeping the current tax rates?
WH warns tax defeat could trigger new recession
Raising the direst alarm yet, the Obama administration warned fellow Democrats on Wednesday that if they defeat the big tax-cut compromise detested by many liberals, they could jolt the nation back into recession.
news.yahoo.com...
Originally posted by aching_knuckles
Wait, so I quote Obama to you, and you bellow "You expect me to believe that partisan crap??" and then you turn around and quote me the White House as a source, and since it agrees with what you say, it is now an infallible source? Come on.
Tax cuts expiring for the top 2% loses an income stream of 800 billion.
Originally posted by Matrix Rising
They claim to be upset with Obama but the White House urged them to make the Middle Class tax cut permanent before the election. The Democrats could have passed Middle Class tax cuts easily before the election.
Originally posted by WTFover
The difference is (and I suspect you really know this): I quoted Obama on something Obama actually said. On the other hand, throughout this thread, you have only repeated something a Dem has told you a Rep has said. For hearsay to acceptable, it must be corroborated. Otherwise, it is just rhetoric. Without wanting to accept it, you've already proved this to yourself, by not finding any direct evidence any of what you've said about the intentions of Reps.
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by aching_knuckles
Allow me to ask you. If your so knowledgeable with the current taxes and what not. Let me ask? You do know the top 2% of the richest people in the US pay over 37% of the nations annual taxes grossed right?
source: www.craigsteiner.us...
source: www.straightdope.com...
source: taxprof.typepad.com...
source: www.taxfoundation.org...
So with this information, how does your argument about taxes in general, suggesting that the rich shouldn't get a break, how does your argument hold any merit?
Are you suggesting those who take the initiative and better themselves should now be reprimanded, and told to pay even more, knowing they pay the most to begin with? How does that sound like the American way? That goes against everything this country was founded upon.edit on 9-12-2010 by Whereweheaded because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by aching_knuckles
Allow me to ask you. If your so knowledgeable with the current taxes and what not. Let me ask? You do know the top 2% of the richest people in the US pay over 37% of the nations annual taxes grossed right?