It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So, you have a problem with this release of information, but not the release of the Iraq/A-stan info? Jeebus.....
Originally posted by citizenc
reply to post by signal2noise
So, you have a problem with this release of information, but not the release of the Iraq/A-stan info? Jeebus.....
Exactly... Because the previous leaks were about exposing double standards and secret practices in war that go contrary to what the US and allies were claiming to be doing in Irak and Afghanistan.
This is, however, more than just wanting to give a black-eye to the US, but the US is the target...
Then, change name to "USleaks", drop the Wiki...
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Wikileaks reported FACTS, I am interested in facts and won't condemn anyone for giving them to me. The citizens are PAYING for all this, they serve to know the truth. Especially for allies it's important, because it seems to confirm that they are being played by the US who only care about their agenda...
Also, saying they're unbalanced is ridiculous. FACTS can't be unbalanced as they don't include opinions. They just dump the facts on us, and don't make any statements regarding them. What baffles me even more is that you claim they're unbalanced but you haven't even read the majority of cables!! You are forming your "unbalanced" opinion on incomplete data...which shows that you're biased against Wikileaks from the start.
I for one say: GO WIKILEAKS GO!! One of the few news sources that focuses on facts and NOT opinions.edit on 28-11-2010 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)
Well its not facts they are releasing for the most part is peoples opinions on other people and things. This more like a release of gossip then it is facts.
Also, saying they're unbalanced is ridiculous. FACTS can't be unbalanced as they don't include opinions. They just dump the facts on us, and don't make any statements regarding them. What baffles me even more is that you claim they're unbalanced but you haven't even read the majority of cables!! You are forming your "unbalanced" opinion on incomplete data...which shows that you're biased against Wikileaks from the start.
Originally posted by citizenc
Again, I am repeating myself because this is the important point I'm trying to get across:
BALANCE!
Where is that info? When is it coming out? Will it ever?
Until now, the only holiday we'll be celebrating on this day is the Cake-in-the-Face on the US Day... nothing more.
Truth, or by defect, the closest that can be managed, is sought by taking into account as many sides as possible.
With only one source info as this case, this becomes just a propaganda act, because, although this info is clamorously important, it comes from one source only and speaks about one source only.
Not enough, and not right.