It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by phatpackage
reply to post by wcitizen
more or less stated
Did he say it or not? More or less counts for dirt. He either did or he didn't. I'm not saying that the bombing you claimed never happened. I'm un decided. I would just like to see your proof!
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Yeah and?
The US is DIRECTLY funding Pakistan with BILLIONS of $, most of it ending up in Taliban hands.
Not to mention the drug trade money... ending up in Taliban hands.
Not to mention the ``aid`` to Afghanistan... ending up in Taliban hands.
Total direct aid from the US government to the Talibans? SEVERAL BILLIONS A YEAR, not counting the allowed drug trade.
So yeah.
The star of the comedy, at least for the Turkish media, is Gulen. The 78-year-old imam has lived in self-imposed exile for two decades, due to charges by Turkish prosecutors that he led a conspiracy to subvert the secular state. He presides over Turkey's largest religious movement, commanding the loyalty of two-thirds of the Turkish police, according to some reports. His movement - a transnational civic society movement inspired by Gulen's teachings - also controls a network of elite schools that educate a tenth of the high school students in the Turkic world from Baku to Kyrgyzstan. And it reportedly controls businesses with tens of billions of dollars in assets. His movement has been expelled from the Russian Federation and his followers arrested in Uzbekistan by local authorities who believe his goal is a pan-Turkic union from the Bosporus to China's western Xinjiang province ("East Turkestan" to Gulen's movement).
The Controversial Muslim preacher has now extended his tentacles into schools in the United States, where he controls and operates more than 100 charter schools within a calculatively set up maze of dubious NGOs. Fethullah Gulen, whose organizations’ net worth is estimated to be somewhere between $22 billion and $50 billion, owns and operates over three hundred Madrasas around the world, including Pakistan, Central Asia, and the Caucasus. While Gulen’s suspicious and secretive Madrasas have been shut down and or restrained in countries such as Russia, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, based on these governments’ justified suspicions that his schools had more than just education on their agendas, his rapidly and secretively expanding charter school empire here in the US has gone quite unnoticed and unacknowledged. In less than a decade Gulen’s Islamic network in the US has established over 100 publicly funded charter schools in 25 states. What makes this eyebrow raising phenomenon a very disturbing case is the fact that despite official documents and publicly available data Fethullah Gulen is going out of his way to deny his connections to these schools. The question is why?
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by Fractured.Facade
How hard is it for the US government to send false information and make it look like a leak?
Answer (very freaken easy)
How hard is it for an American government employee to send leaks without having to put his/her life at risk.
Answer (almost impossible)
Originally posted by TwiTcHomatic
How likely is it that they would leak their own info, that would need to be apologized for to almost every nation they deal with? Not very.
Past documents I could see how the argument could be made it was leaked on purpose.. but the fact that The U.S. is doing unprecedented beforehand apologizing gives a VERY strong impression this is not the case here.
Originally posted by TwiTcHomatic
reply to post by oozyism
A dis-info campaign to make themselves look bad to all these countries they have apologized to in advance?... that makes absolutely no sense.
None.
Why don't the US apologize for their role in Vietnam?
Why don't the US apologize for their support to the dictatorships in South America?
Why don't the US apologize for their role in Afghanistan?
Why don't the US apologize for their role in Iraq?
Originally posted by TwiTcHomatic
reply to post by oozyism
How has it made them look bad? It has not YET.. but they know it is coming with the upcoming leaks.
When has the U.S. started apologizing? Since they learned this leak was coming out... have you not been reading about all the communications to all the embassies in the past 72 hours?
Instead of arguing just to argue.. how about research what is actually going on.
And linking to the Huffington post means nothing.. they are as bad the Enquirer.edit on 26-11-2010 by TwiTcHomatic because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by Fractured.Facade
How hard is it for the US government to send false information and make it look like a leak?
Answer (very freaken easy)
How hard is it for an American government employee to send leaks without having to put his/her life at risk.
Answer (almost impossible)
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by Fractured.Facade
How hard is it for the US government to send false information and make it look like a leak?
Answer (very freaken easy)
How hard is it for an American government employee to send leaks without having to put his/her life at risk.
Answer (almost impossible)
Originally posted by ParkerCramer
almost impossible.
these are two very good points you bring up here, but, what about another possible scenario;
someone(s) within the gov't, and/or CIA is fed up with the actions of TPTB, and they have been providing info to wiki-leaks. these individuals would have to be very well connected, and granted, they may have an agenda of their own, but until this could be ruled out, it remains a very viable option.
Originally posted by TwiTcHomatic
reply to post by oozyism
Well, IF it is a "dis-info campaign".. they need to fire the guy running that department... for it is not well thought out.
The information that will be coming from this leak is back room talks from our foreign delegates bad-mouthing their host countries.. what possible good will that do for the U.S.? None.
Putting the spotlight on these upcoming leaks is the last thing they want to do.. in fact they would rather nobody sees them.
When you keep bringing up when have they apologized for past acts.. you prove the point I am trying to make. They never have... so the fact they ARE doing it at this very second is completely out of character.edit on 26-11-2010 by TwiTcHomatic because: Spelling corrections
Originally posted by oozyism
Yes, that is a viable option, but my two points takes the issue in hand.
Yes it is possible this could be a credible leak, but that is almost impossible at this day and age. You just can't leak something, and get away with it. Even if you are in CIA, it just isn't possible, you will be facing the might of a whole nation (which has tentacle which reaches every nation in this earth + every industry), and that is just too much.
The odds are there, that Wikileak might have started true, but to be honest, even if Wikileak was credible, it would be immensely easy for the government to corrupt it, hence hire agents to pretend they are leaking files, and send files to Wikileaks which are not true, but are dis-info propaganda.
The odds are against credible leak.