It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jaxnmarko
If these are true, and the Chinese intend to go to the moon and have been nearing that goal with all their testing of manned capsules and landers and rockets, my questions are: what will they find, will we somehow stop them, will they be stopped by another source, or what will be the consequences?
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by jaxnmarko
If these are true, and the Chinese intend to go to the moon and have been nearing that goal with all their testing of manned capsules and landers and rockets, my questions are: what will they find, will we somehow stop them, will they be stopped by another source, or what will be the consequences?
CHECK MATE
That is NASA chief Griffinedit on 15-11-2010 by zorgon because: Classified
Originally posted by jaxnmarko
Now that we know there is water up there, I don't know why we aren't going back. Solar panels for electricity, water for oxygen, hydrogen, water, growing food, various metals for manufacturing...... let alone what alien technology that might be there, unless of course, we really were warned off and are worried about the warning. The space station is closer but dangerous. Zero gravity is hard on humans, dodging space debris is dodgy , and it is totally reliant on us. A large enough base on the moon could be fairly self sufficient and a great starting place to head to other places from, with the low gravity. Blurring images is inexcusable. They were paid for by our tax dollars. I know, NASA is almost a dependent of the Military but aren't they supposed to answer to the public as well? We lost control of our own government years ago. Eisenhower was right about the military industrial complex, and we are its serfs. China may be better at copying than creation, and sometimes not even that good at copying, but really, we are only talking about tech we used in the 60's and 70's.
Originally posted by Zesko Whirligan
The reason we haven't been back to the Moon is purely political. Any scientific research that doesn't directly benefit the government (such as military technology) or contribute to the economy is traditionally put on the shelf, including the Man on the Moon program. Yes, the Apollo missions were sensational news stories (at first), but what benefits to military technology or the economy came out of the manned missions to the Moon? Very little.
That's why several presidencies in a row have shelved a manned return to the Moon. In today's economy, the cost would be astronomical and unjustifiable. Obama CORRECTLY canceled plans for a manned return to the Moon.
Frankly, a robotic return would be significantly cheaper and would make more sense. Sending humans into space is a ridiculous expenditure when the same things can be accomplished by robots for a fraction of the cost.
— Zesko Whirliganedit on 11/15/2010 by Zesko Whirligan because: typo
Originally posted by backinblack
Dont forget H3, You would have to think longterm a lunar base would save money if it was set up as a base for future space exploration...It could maybe pay for itself from mining...
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by backinblack
Dont forget H3, You would have to think longterm a lunar base would save money if it was set up as a base for future space exploration...It could maybe pay for itself from mining...
By the time NASA gets back there the HE3 will be all strip mined
Originally posted by Zesko Whirligan
Imagine millions of viewers in Lunar Theaters, wearing headsets, listening to John Williams soundtracks and narration as they explore the Lunar Surface in REAL time, courtesy of a few dozen Lunar Tractors roving about on the hostile surface of the Moon. It can be done right now.
Imagine millions of viewers in Lunar Theaters, wearing headsets, listening to John Williams soundtracks and narration as they explore the Lunar Surface in REAL time, courtesy of a few dozen Lunar Tractors roving about on the hostile surface of the Moon. It can be done right now.
Originally posted by Zesko Whirligan
But, you see, the HE3 isn't immediately commercial and it doesn't appeal to the public.... It would take DECADES to successfully mine the Moon in quantities that justified the expense. You're not going to see resource-tapping on the Moon until the 2030's or 2040's.
But we can put high-resolution camera tractors up there RIGHT NOW and charge people for the experience of exploring the Moon.
That's something we can do NOW.
— Zesko Whirligan
Originally posted by backinblack
The greenies would go ape??? Tractors digging up that prinstine enviroment??