It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheBlackDog
reply to post by BIONICLE ALEX
So if I did do my homework , would I think this is Jesus flying through the solar system on a giant spaceship....?
Why does Jesus need a spaceship....?
Oh God!! this isn't about that, I don't care about Stars and Flags. I even thought of it until you people bought it up . This is something diferent, not that childish stuff.
Originally posted by Phage
To give you an idea of what you are looking at, the scans have a resolution of 25 of our Earth microns per pixel. That "first large object" is 18 pixels long, 450 microns. That's 18/100 of our Earth inches. That's the width of four or five earthling hairs. That's less than 2 pixels on a typical earth LCD monitor. Considering that there are thousands of plates (14" x 14") it is not surprising that a few flaws of this nature (dust, scratches, flaws in the emulsion) appear in some of them. Not bad for mere humans.
What "current" images are you talking about?
For what ever its worth; that "object" seems to be gone in current images.
Current images ... SDSS (Sloan Digital Sky Survey) ... I already said that.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by AnthraAndromda
Sloan. Maybe you can provide a link to the images of the region in question since you claim to have seen them. Or maybe you can't.
I would guess that you can't. Because there are no images from Sloan of that region. SDSS used a telescope in New Mexico. The region containing the "giant spaceships" can't be seen from New Mexico.
So why did you say this?
For what ever its worth; that "object" seems to be gone in current images.
What images did you see?
And why did you say this?
Current images ... SDSS (Sloan Digital Sky Survey) ... I already said that.
You blew it again spaceman.
"What's this funny line/feature/UFO in my scan?"
These images were scanned from photographic plates, so every once in a while, you will encounter a scratch, internal telescope reflection, fingerprint, etc. in your image. So far, none have turned out to be aliens. I'm compiling an informal catalog of regions with plate anomalies, so if you run across one, let us know.
For those unfamiliar with the present surveillance state including space assault weaponry, see www.satweapons.com. and www.surveillanceissues.com.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by AnthraAndromda
I was talking about the "giant spaceships" in the OP. I, in my fallable human way, assumed that's what you talking about. My apologies.
But it seems aliens are subject to making assumptions as well. You don't know how the data was handled, can't be bothered to look for information about it (yet have time to view skymap), and assume that; a) artifacts could not have been introduced if the data was "professionally" handled or b) if there are artifacts they are a result of unprofessional practices.
"What's this funny line/feature/UFO in my scan?"
These images were scanned from photographic plates, so every once in a while, you will encounter a scratch, internal telescope reflection, fingerprint, etc. in your image. So far, none have turned out to be aliens. I'm compiling an informal catalog of regions with plate anomalies, so if you run across one, let us know.
archive.stsci.edu...
Originally posted by BIONICLE ALEX
Wow wow! is this is what I'm thinking? please you guy's tell me this is not what I'm thinking, could they be hiding the object with a phony name or something? I hope I'm wrong.
www.naic.edu...