Georgia Senate makes Mark of the Beast illegal

This is stupid.

The bible says the mark of the beast is optional (if you take it, you can participate in commerce, if not, you're not able to buy or trade, but you get into heaven)... so this law wouldn't help with the mark of the beast, because most people would voluntarily take this instead of having to carry around credit cards and cheques. (assuming the mark of the beast and "bible" end times are real.)

Waste of time and money is right, and I would probably vote with the two that voted against.


edit to correct grammar. you're welcome

[edit on 22-2-2010 by awmilton]

Originally posted by factfinder45
It always amazes me how gullable people are. Almost all of Americans already have a chip and they don't even know it because they carry it in their pocket or on their waist. Yes you guessed it it is your cell phone and it will tell who you are where you are and where you have been they can also be fixed to turn on the microphone remotley to listen in on you at any time. So this new law in Georgia is just fluff even if it does have good intentions because soon we will be doing all transactions and communications through are phones.

I wish more people thought like you, allow me to show you that you are not wrong. Mods please excuse the long post of imgs (have my reasons)

This is just a minutia of the coverage by one company called link to check your area.
coverage
This is what it looks like close up in terms of density

You know they are the ones that allow iphones and mac and other mobiles to get a location but it doesnt stop there
Broadcom
Qaulcomm
Dell
Texas Instruments
and then Google is doing the same with latitude - you know whilst they drive around doing streetview.

but ofcourse let us cover all the bases - some are too smart to be zombies willing to divulge their every move - how do we finger them, simply lets make every sim a hotspot, every time you do a locate request something called 2nd tier data collection happens see you need to send a snapshot of all the mac addresses sourounding you to get a fix SimFI
Lets put one in every car ->Ford


Of course this is just for marketing purposes but lets see dont think you will find the original article online anymore ;-) so here is the cache
google cache

"I don't know anything about the people, or the machines they are using, but I know they are there checking their locations," Morgan said. "I've seen fifty billion locations over the past year or so. I can see where people are, what they are doing, what streets are busy at different times of day. At an anonymous aggregate level, I can see how the world is moving around."

which is a complete LIE - wont say no more

and to boot just for laughs

how quaint
Please people get smart, quickly!

Whatever laws we pass in our "sovereign" states, Obama will. probably in Nov 2010, declare that we have 10 fema states and has already given a list of candidates for the 10 new appointed by decree governors. So our Constitution will be out the window and any laws or safeguards of liberty will be gone. But people should pass as many protective laws as they can because it raises public awareness of what is coming down the line.



[edit on 22-2-2010 by m khan]

reply to post by m khan


I read today that they've tracked down the Google hackers and it turns out that they have ties to the Chinese government.
I wonder if it's related? Maybe as a way of verifying the new account holder isn't in China?

Originally posted by Angus123
reply to post by pumpkinorange

 

I'm sorry, but I don't see how electronic health records is a threat to anyone's liberties.
Centralized data of a person's medical history would solve a lot of problems.

Sorry to you as well. Did you look at the progression of comments and sources in my post? You sound like perhaps you are you caught up in the idea health care reform is about helping people? I am not.
I consider a federal reg or law requiring me to have a chip implanted in my body with govt info on it an assault of the highest order to my liberties.


[edit on 22-2-2010 by pumpkinorange]

Originally posted by pumpkinorange

Originally posted by Angus123
reply to post by pumpkinorange

 

I'm sorry, but I don't see how electronic health records is a threat to anyone's liberties.
Centralized data of a person's medical history would solve a lot of problems.

Sorry to you as well. Did you look at the progression of comments and sources in my post? You sound like perhaps you are you caught up in the idea health care reform is about helping people? I am not.
I consider a federal reg or law requiring me to have a chip implanted in my body with govt info on it an assault of the highest order to my liberties.


[edit on 22-2-2010 by pumpkinorange]

On that we agree. (The federally mandated implanted chip.) But I don't think that's on the table. If however it ever comes to that I will def not comply.

reply to post by NightGypsy



Sorry to hear that, cuz it means, they either don't know what the mark is, or they're trying to make people feel good who don't know.

Seems like if the churches were really doing their jobs instead of messing around, folks would have simply laughed at this waste of effort.

What a messed up world we're in.......

reply to post by pixanomaly


Aren't these chips already implanted in FL drivers licenses?

To bad that the mark is most likely the RealID and has nothing to do with being implanted, eh?

Now the Georgia Senate needs to take the next step...

Tear down the monument of the beast.

Georgia Guidestones

it's called human technological advancement.

unfortunately it's too soon to take on such a commitment, pretty soon it's going to have to be upgraded with something better and i'm sure people don't want to keep getting surgery every time a new one comes out. on top of that, the people in power will most likely want to use this for control.

i like the idea, but we need to mature up first.

Most interesting. Now I wonder...what would make Georgia pass such a bill?

Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by RestingInPieces

 

I don't know if it is a coordinated conspiracy or a natural evolution, but it is certainly happening now.

We went from bartering wares, to bartering gold and gems, to printing local currencies, silver notes, and coins, to a Federal Currency, to a Credit based system, to a inter-connected Debit based system which was then adopted by the Federal Government to distribute welfare and social security. Direct Deposit became mandatory at most employers, especially government or larger corporate ones.

All the while we developed a system to store magnetic imprints and ID numbers. This system evolved to become biologically safe and began to hold more than just ID numbers, now it can hold all necessary data. The system was rolled out for pets and used successfully, then it transitioned to teens and club-goers as a novelty. Now it is being touted for medical histories, criminals, and newborns.

Lest we not forget, that while these two evolutions were going, we also became immeasurably centered around Social Security numbers. Less than 100 years ago they were entirely voluntary. Then they became important for Selective Service of 18 year old males, then they became important for everyone to get government benefits, then they became important for children, and now they come and meet you in the hospital and assign one to your baby within hours after birth!?!

Now, on the sidelines, we have immigration debate changing lawmakers perception of Driver's License numbers, and we have a push for a National Identification Card, and some Uniformity from state to state regarding ID's?

If you don't see at least a little bit of Conspiracy in the developments of the last 50 to 70 years, then you are not looking very hard!

Like I say, maybe this is a natural evolution of technology and politics. Maybe Marx was correct in assuming that a Capitalistic society ultimately becomes a Socialistic one. Maybe everyone that enacted all of these laws had the best of intentions. Maybe lawmakers really do care if I wear my seatbelt and if I have a retirement plan and health insurance. And maybe the writers of the Bible foresaw all of this a few thousand years ago!

you sir, have connected the dots, that should illustrate the point made by my states decision to outlaw chipping. Now, onto the skeptics!

Edited, I apologize

[edit on 23-2-2010 by Paradox.]

reply to post by NightGypsy


Too bad no one will ever agree on what THE ACTUAL mark of the beast is, if anything. This reeks of an excuse to censor this in the future, or at least some lame populist political move to appeal to the idiotic fundamentalist Christians. If they want to ban the Mark of the Beast, they damn well pick ONE mark and stick with it. Moronic politicians...impotent, apathetic constituents.

And I wouldn't want to be micro chipped either and would support the ban in most cases, but calling it (or even inferring it that it is) the Mark of the Beast is just pandering.

[edit on 23-2-2010 by Threadfall]

[edit on 23-2-2010 by Threadfall]

Uh... what are the names of the two politicians who voted NO?!?!?.. vote those scumbags out of office, damn!

Whether you are a Christian, or not, the idea of any tracking ID, implanted or otherwise, is the beginning of a Dystopian society like those written about in fictional works such as 1984, etc...

A dystopia (from the Ancient Greek δυσ-: bad-, ill- and τόπος: place, landscape) (alternatively, cacotopia,[1], or anti-utopia) is a vision, of an often futuristic society, which has developed into a negative version of Utopia. A Dystopia is often characterized by an authoritarian or totalitarian form of government. It often features different kinds of repressive social control systems, a lack or total absence of individual freedoms and expressions and a state of constant warfare or violence.

I think that we can all agree that this kind of thing crosses the bounds of religious belief and would adversely effect all of us. If you want to call it the “Mark of the Beast”, the RealID, a National ID, or just Sam, its still a bad thing.

Very nice that they state this so explicitly. Just in case.

reply to post by jokei

Maybe you can dig a bit further at the .gov site or even email someone? This is a wow, some people got very upset with this microchip method of tracking and numbering people, upset enough to make a law against it. That is strong words.

10 LC 29 4070S (SCS) Senate Bill 235 By: Senators Pearson of the 51st, Rogers of the 21st, Smith of the 52nd and Tolleson of the 20th

This Act shall be known as the "Microchip Consent Act of 2010."

SECTION 4.
All laws and parts of laws in conflict with this Act are repealed.
www.legis.ga.gov...

[edit on 23-2-2010 by rhines]

Read closely...it says not required. That means it won't be forced on you. But it has always been known that the mark will be voluntary. Then, it does mention how voluntary implantation is to be done. Which means there will not be roadblocks and mandates like the alarmists were presenting. The bill states "Microchipping Consent"...so that does mean that it WILL be used.

Just because it will not be forced does not mean that it cannot be coerced. It could become a subtle ultimatum.

"I am sorry; we are a 'green' hospital facility and we no longer use paper records. Everything is digital. That way you are protected from mistakes because your ID and medical information is immediately validated. We only use scanners here. "

"You don't have a chip? Well, that's your choice, but we are not set up to keep records of your medication here. We signed the green covenant and we no longer use old methods that used toxic inks. You have to change with the times, you know. Sorry, no can do."

And, because of your choice not to "voluntarily" go along with the incoming new system of things, you will be out in the cold. No longer able to buy or sell. It will be your own choice and no one else will be doing it to you.


Scriptures have always made it clear that it would be by personal choice and not forced.

This law from the state merely lets you know that it is not the doing or demands of your government.

As I said earlier it was the Freemasons who have started setting up at churches and shopping centers to promote child ID kits to gather bio information. It's called the CHIP program.



BTW...it kinda reminds me of the double speak where your SS card plainly states on the card itself "not to be used for identification purposes"....yet how many times are we required to use it as such? Years ago many stores would refuse to take your check without showing SS card and they even wrote the number on your check! Some banks even printed the number on your card. Even today, in some places it is still "required". The chip will be the same way. Not required or mandated, but businesses will all be on the scan system. After all, it's their choice to go with the Green covenant and there will probably be a lot of incentive.




[edit on 23-2-2010 by Alethea]

[edit on 23-2-2010 by Alethea]