It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Bitter exchanges in the US over healthcare reform have seen Britain’s NHS drawn into the debate, with American right-wingers keen to demonise the UK system.
Campaign groups have been airing adverts detailing horror stories from UK patients it claims were deprived of treatment under the NHS.
They have been warning that universal state-provided care like Britain’s should not be adopted by the US.
Commentators have suggested veteran senator Edward Kennedy and physicist Stephen Hawking would be left to die under the UK system because of their age and disability respectively.
The second of these claims, in Investor’s Business Daily, was corrected after the newspaper realised the renowned scientist was born, and still lives and works, in the UK.
With 50million people un-insured, President Obama is proposing reforms to extend state cover. But the plans are meeting hostility, with conservatives allegedly “ambushing” town hall meetings on the issue which have then descended into shouting matches. Opponents say it would be too costly for taxpayers, and would result in less choice being available.
The Investor’s Business Daily had written: “People such as scientist Stephen Hawking wouldn’t have a chance in the UK, where the NHS would say the life of this brilliant man, because of his physical handicaps, is essentially worthless.”
Mr Hawking himself yesterday debunked the allegation, saying: “I wouldn’t be here today if it were not for the NHS. I have received a large amount of high-quality treatment, without which I would not have survived.”
A spokeswoman for the UK Department of Health rejected allegations that it discriminates on the basis of age.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
question.
Does Gordon Brown, Tony Blair, or the Queen have to wait in line with the plebes?
hmmmm?
OH?
What's that you say?
They don't?
They have fully privatized insurance and see private doctors?
Really?
But I thought the NHS was AWESOME DUDE!
Originally posted by john124
Originally posted by mnemeth1
question.
Does Gordon Brown, Tony Blair, or the Queen have to wait in line with the plebes?
hmmmm?
OH?
What's that you say?
They don't?
They have fully privatized insurance and see private doctors?
Really?
But I thought the NHS was AWESOME DUDE!
Most people aren't that well off.
Yes if you can afford to go private then many do..... as I said before the NHS has a budget. For those who can't afford to go private, then the NHS can be a life-saver.
If you concentrate on one particular negative aspect then you will dislike it, that's guaranteed.
How many can afford their own healthcare insurance in the US?
Originally posted by grover
And corporate control of heath care has been so much better and cheaper???
Originally posted by grover
reply to post by KnoxMSP
And corporate control of heath care has been so much better and cheaper???
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Why are you demonising anyone who disagrees with this silly agenda?
I am not part of any right wing group, and I am not right wing.
I just do not want the .gov telling me what I can and cannot do.
Id honestly rather die standing up than live on my knees.
I bet this kind of "liberty" talk is foreign to most people, because they are so enslaved they think more enslavement is a good thing.
This has nothing to do with "Is NHS good" it has to do with, does the government have the right to force their version of medical care down my throat???
What if I dont want medical care? What if I would rather suffer in pain than submit to this dehumanization?
Is my life not my own? Is my body owned by the .gov now?
This really boils down to this issue. Who owns my body and my life?
Me or .Gov?
At least that is my view of this.
Originally posted by john124
Can you still pay not for your own separate healthcare insurance if you wish?
Does this not benefit the many
I understand that you want freedom of choice, but isn't it a little paranoid to fear it in the way you seem to?
Sometimes the greater good of the many may outweigh your own desires.
To satisfy your desires maybe Obama could implement as opt out condition for those who don't wish to opt in,
Originally posted by CRB86
At the risk of repeating myself, if the NHS is so bad, why aren't the British posters on this board roundly criticising it? After all, we're an intelligent bunch who see through the "lies", no?
Why are there no campaigns in Britain to scrap it? There's campaigns about the Euro, the Expenses Scandals, the Iraq War, why no 'scrap the evil NHS' campaign? Why is it political suicide to publically voice opinion on the dismantling of the NHS, whether you be Labour or Conservative?
Because, the truth of the matter is, that the NHS is brilliant, has been brilliant and will continue to be brilliant. Thanks. Do what you want in your country. After all, it's your country. Leave our NHS alone. It's far from perfect (what system is?) but it is has done an immense amount of good work for generations, and hopefully will continue to do so far into the future.
The NHS