It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Balez
That is wrong, the outcome from an impact and how the objects involved is decided how much energy is involved in the impact, their mass and composition.
These UFO's are not even close to the thrusters! Did you not see the camera ZOOM IN? If the UFO's were closer to the camera, then the pure action of zooming in would have made the UFO's leave the view!
Correction, it comes from the CENTER of the screen. The pure fact that the UFO became visible in less than a second time frame means that is was NOT A SLOW ROTATION.
If the UFO was slowly rotating, I would expect the reflection to start from a dim light that slowly changes to a bright light. But we don't see a slow prgression of brightness, we see and INSTANT brightness, that I have timed AT LESS THAN 1 second.
Not only that, but if the object was rotating, then the brightness of the light would CHANGE. But the brightness stays completly the same!!
Are you suggesting these are perfectly FLAT clear mirrors? How can a rotating piece of ice reflect a constant level or brightness? Especialy after it was just INVISIBLE??
Watch the video. It takes less than a second to go from INVISIBLE to VISIBLE. This means IF it was rotating, it would be rotating quite fast. But if it was rotating fast, it should have became invisible again, but it DOESNT.
If it was rotating slow, it would probably not become visible so quickly, it would slowly become visible. The speed at which it appears on the video, is not like any "rotating reflection" that I have seen.
The UFO that you claim is "rotating ice" would have a DIFFUSE reflection, but in the video it appears to have a SPECULAR one.
Your arguments are WEAK!
I don't think you are paying attention enough. When 1 object is stationary, and another moving object hits it. That stationary object has an instant change in velocity. After the moving object reflects off the once stationary object, it no longer effects it. This means the object that was once stationary, would keep its new velocity it recieved after the impact. It's new velocity should not change, it should be constant untill acted apon again.
But in the video, the velocity change of the UFO is NOT instant. It slowly gain's velocity over a period of time. This could only happen if it was being hit by multiple objects, each with a faster speed than the last one. This is not happening in the video. The UFO is gaining velocity from NO COLLSIONS.
Originally posted by Balez
And how long was it invisible before that second? You dont know that.
Originally posted by Balez
So on that second you can measure how long it is being in the 'dark'?
Did you even consider how long it was invisible on the screen before it showed up, and where it was?
Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
Good post OP
The power of denial always amazes me. The UFOs in the Tether video glow and pulsate, materialize and dematerialize, stop and start, change directions etc - and yet there are many who go "well that couldn't be a fleet of massive ships in our space, that must be 'dust', or 'debris', or 'ice particles'......"
Originally posted by brickhouse32
To me there doesn't appear to be anything intelligent about the debree movement most travel in straight lines.
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
GIVE ME VALID EXPLAINATIONS.
Originally posted by nablator
It's been discussed countless times since 1996 and debunked by NASA experts.
Originally posted by nablator
reply to post by MrdDstrbr
You only see what you want to see, right? Don't make up things that can be checked easily. There weren't two cameras filming the tether at the same time. About the astronauts not seeing anything, does "there's a little debris that a.. kinda flies with us" sound like "there is nothing out there"?