It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HazyChestNutz
A radio host at the time, Can be found on youtube. Also jet pilots who were "pursuing the object" and the man on the Ancient Aliens episode. Just use a search engine.
Equally serious was the problem of equipment. In a report filled with illuminating detail, the British expert found our seaward reconnaissance grossly inefficient because of the total lack of ASV equipment and because of the limited number of patrol aircraft of suitable range. The radar screen along the West Coast was based on too few stations, and the equipment itself had inherent defects which made it "gravely unsuitable." All radar experts were agreed that each set represented a compromise between a variety of demands, but the principal American radar was "unique in combining slow search with poor cover in elevation, with lack of all facilities for eight finding, and with a grave danger of plotting false tracks." Moreover, dependable employment of this radar had been made even more unlikely because of a mistake in the selection of sites for its installation. Personnel to operate the radars had not been carefully selected and were inadequate both in numbers and in training. The United States was found to have repeated an early error of Britain in failing to provide for the training of large numbers of skilled radar technicians.
Officials in Washington accepted the report in the constructive spirit in which it was offered. The director of Air Defense at AAF Headquarters concurred in every detail with the findings and called the study "a damning indictment of our whole warning service." He also expressed the view that the situation on the East Coast was worse than the conditions reported along the Pacific. The Chief Signal Officer and the Chief of the Army Air Forces agreed that the cause of the trouble lay in the lack of time for improvement of radar equipment and the limitations imposed by considerations of security. But these officers also pointed out that the War Department and its subordinate units were not organized in such a way as to promote a maximum integration of effort in the field of radar.
Independent analyses by American officials bore out the general verdict rendered by Watson-Watt. Early in February 1942, an Army Air Forces report described the defenses of both the Eastern and Western Defense Commands as "entirely inadequate."
What do hundreds of fragments look like? I posted pictures of some fragments earlier here, and am reposting the photos below for reference.
Originally posted by FireMoon
No more lame and incompetent than your understanding of a 3 inch Archie shell. Ack Ack was area effect weapon and the shells fragmented into hundreds of razor sharp pieces, only one of which had to hit something important to bring down a plane let alone, rip through the flimsy fabric of a balloon's envelope
That may have been part of the reason why weather balloons might not be so easy to shoot down, if they were at 25,000 feet and the range of the 3" shells was more like 15,000 feet or perhaps a bit more, but they couldn't reach 25,000 feet to my knowledge.
Originally posted by MrInquisitive
If the AA couldn't reach an altitude of much over 15,000 feet, the shrapnel is not going to go up another 10,000 feet -- particularly with a whole lot of velocity.
You need to re-read the account of the guys who launched the balloons. They said the balloons were being shot AT, not being shot down. After they reported that to command, their unit received orders to shoot at the balloon also, so whoever was shooting at the balloon wasn't having much luck bringing it down.
Originally posted by FireMoon
No, the simple fact the wind was blowing in the wrong direction meant there were no balloons shot down over LA that night a fact that is often completely overlooked .
The chain of defense was pathetic as admitted by its own command. Radar being one of the weakest links.
Originally posted by FireMoon
That was, almost exclusively down to Radar being used as part of a chain of defense.
That article indeed says 3:36 but that may be either a typo, an error, or some other kind of misunderstanding because it also gives another time the firing started which is much closer to other accounts of starting not too long after 3:00:
Originally posted by MrInquisitive
From what I read in the below article, the blackout commenced about 2:25 am (I'm guessing due to the offshore radar sighting), and the shelling began at 3:36 am and continued intermittently until 4:14 am.
Battle of LA article
The 3:16 is much closer to being correct than the 3:36, according to other accounts I've read. It may have been a little earlier than that.
Why, everybody was asking, were they not ordered to go into action during the 51-minute period between the first air-raid alert at 2:25 AM and the first artillery firing at 3:16?
Did you look near the top of page 24 of this thread? I posted the locations of 2 of the relevant launches there along with numerous other relevant details.
Originally posted by MrInquisitive
I agree with you about the timing being more crucial as to when the firing started in relation to when the balloons were launched, although where the balloons were launched also becomes an issue and I saw nothing definitive about this
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by mcrom901
No. The AAA batteries were not centrally directed.