It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Please cite your source for that, I never saw such verification.
Originally posted by Software_Pyrate
Yes, I do acknowledge that things in the air can be mistaken for something else...However...These/This object/s were verified as being hit
At 3 a.m. on the morning of the raid, the 203rd launched two balloons, one from its headquarters on the Sawtelle Veterans Hospital grounds in Westwood and the other from Battery D, located on the Douglas Aircraft plant site in Santa Monica. So that the balloons could be tracked at night, a candle placed inside a simple highball glass was suspended under each balloon, whose silver color would reflect the light enough to be tracked to heights usually well above 25,000 feet. Lieutenant Melvin Timm, officer in charge of Battery D’s meteorological operations, ordered his balloon launched and had notified the filter room-also known as the Flower Street Control Center, where all planes, identified or otherwise, were tracked on a giant, flat table map-of its departure, when ‘all hell broke loose.’
By the time Timm released his balloon, the city had been under red-alert conditions for more than half an hour; searchlights were on and probing the sky; and anti-aircraft gunners, fingers on their triggers, were nervously following the searchlight beams in hopes of spotting the anticipated enemy planes. It was at this time that Sergeant George Holmes, who had launched Battery D's balloon, called Timm, saying he was no longer able to track it, that someone was shooting at it.
At regimental headquarters they were having the same problem. The officer in charge of the meteorological operations at Sawtelle, Lieutenant John E. Moore, recalled: 'As soon as [their] balloon attained altitude and was carried up the coast by the wind, searchlights came on, picked up the balloon and shortly thereafter, 3-inch anti-aircraft guns began firing. Corporal John O'Connell, in charge of tracking the balloon, ran to me and reported, `Lieutenant, they're firing at my balloon!' I went to the theodolite to verify his report and, sure enough, bursts of AA fire were exploding all around it causing it to bounce and dance all over the sky. I immediately reported to our regimental commanding officer, Colonel Ray Watson, that the guns were firing at our balloon and that there were no aircraft in sight.'
At 0306 a balloon carrying a red flare was seen over Santa Monica and four batteries of anti-aircraft artillery opened fire, whereupon “the air over Los Angeles erupted like a volcano.” From this point on reports were hopelessly at variance.
I immediately reported to our regimental commanding officer, Colonel Ray Watson, that the guns were firing at our balloon and that there were no aircraft in sight
Watson sent out the order that none of the 203rd’s 3-inch guns were to fire, then notified the Flower Street Control Room of what was happening. Astonishingly, the order came back from Flower Street to shoot down the balloon.
said Timm, ‘I was summoned. I was told to keep my mouth shut, and that there had been seven Japanese planes up there. I was also told that if I repeated my story about shooting at a balloon and not enemy planes, I would be put behind bars.
Probably much of the confusion came from the fact that anti-aircraft shell bursts, caught by the searchlights, were themselves mistaken for enemy planes.
Thanks. I researched it a lot so I should know something about it. And the more I researched it, the easier it became to believe that it was war nerves. I don't think the balloons were even needed. Everyone had their finger on the trigger and it could have been a duck or a seagull that started the shooting as tense as everyone was. You have to remember this is shortly after Pearl Harbor and there was an attack on the California coast just prior to this event so they were expecting another one:
Originally posted by Software_Pyrate
reply to post by Arbitrageur
You are for more knowledgeable on this subject than I.
It is just so hard to believe that all this was from "War time Nerves" and balloons.
A few minutes after 7 p.m. on February 23, 1942, the Japanese submarine I-17 surfaced a few hundred yards off the Barnsdall Oil Company's mile-long row of shoreline derricks 10 miles north of Santa Barbara, California. Moments later it opened fire on the giant Richfield aviation fuel storage tanks on the hill behind the beach.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
reply to post by OldDragger
Yes nobody thought anything about a UFO in 1942 or for many years later, though I'm not sure exactly when the UFO angle to the story surfaced.
I never said the object tracked offshore was a weather balloon. Nobody knows what that object was.
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
I'm in SHOCK that on page 24 of this thread, you are still trying to convince folks that this whole incident was caused by a weather balloon (that was launched AFTER the initial radar contact!).
I'm in AWE that you've ignored the fact that the object was tracked on radar, moving at over 300mph, by 3 separate Radar units (one being REGIONAL F*CKING COMMAND!)
The Aichi M6A1 Seiran had the performance of carrier-based bombers, yet it was operated from a submarine.
I-400 beside submarine tender USS Proteus after the war. Note the large hangar and forward catapult.
Well I guess even you have some doubt or you wouldn't have inserted the word "almost" in that statement. If the offshore radar returns had anything to do with that plane, the radar based speed estimates had to be off, not impossible considering the poor training of the radar operators. But with the speed discrepancy (I think the low end of the radar based speed estimates was about 260mph), it's not a slam dunk either, which brings us back to my original statement:
Originally posted by FireMoon
The airplane on board the submarine was almost 100% certain, a Yokosuka E14Y
So I'm still saying nobody knows for sure what it was. I'm not ruling out a Japanese plane but I really don't know how likely that possibility is. I will say it's not unlikely enough for me to rule it out. For one thing the speed estimate doesn't really hold up to scrutiny:
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I never said the object tracked offshore was a weather balloon. Nobody knows what that object was.
If it was really traveling at somewhere between 260-330 mph as I have seen various estimates claim, then why would it take over an hour to go 100 miles? Even according to the Army's report, the thing they were shooting at was barely moving, not going 300 mph so I still don't see why some people connect the offshore radar contact with the later shooting, the speed profile doesn't match, and the radar tracking was lost 3 miles offshore when it should have been the strongest return.
When an air raid defense radar picked up a mysterious contact shortly before 2 a.m. on February 25, the unknown contact was approximately 100 miles southwest of Los Angeles.
Anti-aircraft guns from the IV Interceptor Command opened fire at 3:16 a.m.
Whatever they were shooting at wasn't moving at 300 mph, I think everyone agrees with that. So why does anyone think the object they shot at was the same object that was supposedly traveling offshore at 300 mph (if that figure is correct and that's a big IF)?
A careful study of the evidence suggests that meteorological balloons—known to have been released over Los Angeles —may well have caused the initial alarm. This theory is supported by the fact that anti-aircraft artillery units were officially criticized for having wasted ammunition on targets which moved too slowly to have been airplanes. After the firing started, careful observation was difficult because of drifting smoke from shell bursts.
I think he's right about pretty much everything except why the balloons didn't pop the first time they were fired at. He refers to characteristics of blimps getting holes in them and not falling out of the sky which is true. However I don't think meteorological balloons would have the same tendency to stay aloft as a blimp after being pierced with shrapnel.
Originally posted by Tikiman
I thought this tied it up rather nicely.
Jack Illfrey, a young P38 pilot assigned to the 94th aero squadron stationed at Long Beach Airport reported, "We pilots prayed to the good Lord above that we wouldn't be sent up in that barrage, enemy or not. Most everyone saw or imagined something – Japanese Zero's, P34's, Japanese Betty bombers. We were not sent up". So not even American interceptors were sent up that night, thankfully, as they may likely have become victims of "friendly fire"...
Experienced observers like Peter Jenkins, a staff reporter with the evening Herald Examiner, could not be counted as a reliable witness, as he reported that "I could clearly see the 'V' formation of about 25 silvery planes overhead moving slowly across the sky towards Long Beach". Even Long Beach chief of police J. H. McClelland claimed to have witnessed planes inbound towards Redondo Beach...
Since the 1970's some have proffered that this was caused by extraterrestrial beings flying over the coast of Los Angeles. They usually point to a famous photograph showing search lights and spots as proof. These spots are probably the detonation of Anti-Aircraft projectiles...
Originally posted by NephraTari
this is one of my all time favorite cases because it is so damn hard for them to try and brush it away like the rest.
This is the one case that even the hardest skeptics have trouble discounting.