It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cuhail
Mobile Labs to Target Iraqis for Death
www.globalresearch.ca
(visit the link for the full news article)
U.S. forces in Iraq soon will be equipped with high-tech equipment that will let them process an Iraqi’s biometric data in minutes and help American soldiers decide whether they should execute the person or not, according to its inventor.
"A war fighter needs to know one of three things: Do I let him go? Keep him? Or shoot him on the spot?” Pentagon weapons designer Anh Duong told the Washington Post for a feature on how this 47-year-old former Vietnamese refugee and mother of four rose to become a top U.S. bomb-maker.
Originally posted by marg6043
Really? the last time I check it was Iraqis dying in Iraq, funny that is what the so call liberation is giving them since our nation invaded them. We call them insurgents and terrorist, actually that group is probably untouchable.
BTW what does me being an American born or not has to do with my post.
Actually nothing. Since when ATS nationality of its members is an issue to post.
Originally posted by kangjia57
Reply to deltaboy
If you kill innocent people and use them to test your chemicals in labs (as an excuse to identify the insurgents).
The innocent people will than turn into insurgents and start cooking US soldiers in their tins.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Well if you check closer you will see that the vast majority of Iraqis dying are killed by other Iraqis and Al Qaida insurgents. The Iraqis fighting are not freedom fighters as you might suggest. Last month 100 died from Americans and 2000 died from these extremist.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
There is a lot at play here my friend with many dying to secular violence that been going on for over a 1000 years, groups aligned with Al Qaida for power plays, and still others that are aligned with Iran.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
What they all have in common is they all see chaos in Iraq as their only chance to gain power.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
This is why we are still there for the vast majority of Iraqis want the government to succeed so they can get on with a fruitful life without living in fear from these extremist or another brutal dictator.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
My point about you being American is that you have access to much more information than many other countries that have very narrow channels as to what the populace gets to see. No need to be so defensive...
Originally posted by goosdawg
The same technique used to kill civilians in Iraq and then posthumously label them "insurgents."
Further evidence of the effects of the propaganda machine designed to obfuscate the actual death toll of the Iraqi innocents.
If the situation were reversed, with an invading force occupying American soil, killing our families, destroying our country, raping our resources, and we were forced to repel these invaders using asymmetrical tactics, I'll wager you'd be among the first to be out there "planting crops in the middle of the road."
And using the Iraqi people to test weapons of any stripe, that are only later going to be turned upon American citizens, who protest the erosion of our Constitution, and the establishment of an Imperial Executive Branch, is a crime of international proportions.
Originally posted by goosdawg
Would you mind providing independent, verifiable documentation to support these statements?
Thanks
Only if one has the presence of mind to step away the flow of the MSM's corporate approved swill.
Originally posted by kangjia57
These videos are by those who are fighting the occupation.
These videos are of those who have lost family members.
These videos are of those who have lost their livelihoods.
Yes terrorists also kill Muslims, but I still blame the US because they STARTED the war not the terrorists.
Nope I believe this new way of identification is just to test chemicals on innocent people and see how deadly their effects are.
Basically using humans as guinea pigs to test out new biological weapons the scientists have created.
The US started the war and I blame them for everything that happened
And if the US really wants to get rid of terrorists than why not start the ‘war on terror’ from Saudi Arabia where major terrorists and financial funding comes from?
Let me tell you why, because the US is in it for the OiL!
"I don't want My Lai in Iraq," Duong said. "The biggest difficulty in the global war on terror – just like in Vietnam – is to know who the bad guys are. How do we make sure we don't kill innocents?"
In Iraq and Afghanistan, U.S. military units already are operating under loose rules of engagement that allow them to kill individuals who are identified as suspected terrorists or who show the slightest evidence of being insurgents. American forces also have rounded up tens of thousands of Iraqi military-age males, or MAMs, for detention.
Originally posted by deltaboy
Now we have Sunni Arabs working with American forces against "resistance" that tends to target the Iraqi population who work with the Americans in pursuing peace together. Like for example the 1920 Revolution Brigade that target American forces are now WORKING with the U.S. military. Now thats something.
Source | informationliberation | Mirage Of Improvement In Iraq
We are proudly informed that buying off Sunni militias and resistance fighters at $300 per month is among the latest U.S. military tactics, but we are conscientiously kept uninformed about the implications of such a move. Nor is there any mention of the growing antagonism it has generated in the US-backed Iraqi Government under Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. By its own admission, the U.S. military has paid over $17 million, so far, to recruit 77,000 Sunni fighters, many of whom were launching attacks against the Americans a few weeks ago (International Herald Tribune).
Source | informationliberation | Mirage Of Improvement In Iraq
"We are proudly informed that buying off Sunni militias and resistance fighters at $300 per month is among the latest U.S. military tactics, but kept uninformed about the implications of such a move."
Post purchase, the US military has rechristened them “Concerned Local Citizens,” or “Awakening Forces.” The target is to procure another 10,000.
After it failed to take control of Fallujah during the April 2004 assault, the US employed a similar tactic. It was a presidential election year in the US (as is 2008) and in order to save face, the U.S. military “handed” over security operations in Fallujah to the very people it had fought in April. Money and weapons flooded the city and strengthened the mujahedeen.
Source | informationliberation | Mirage Of Improvement In Iraq
At the time a much larger battle was in the offing, the November 2004 U.S. siege of Fallujah, which left thousands dead, and destroyed approximately 70 percent of the city. It is worth noting that the attack was launched on November 8, 2004, just days after it was determined that George W. Bush would remain in office.
Source | informationliberation | Mirage Of Improvement In Iraq
Let us not discount the fact that the “lower violence rate” being reported by the Western media establishments imply that violence in Iraq is now down to 2005 levels, which at the time was considered catastrophic. A recent Pew Research Center poll found that “nearly 90 percent of US journalists in Iraq say much of Baghdad is still too dangerous to visit.” Those surveyed have admitted that the “coverage has painted too rosy a picture of the conflict” (Reuters).
The not-so-rosy reality is that the resistance has merely shifted location. As Ali Khamees, a former major of the Iraqi army, recently told my Iraqi colleague in Ramadi, Ali al-Fadhily, “it is true that hundreds of fighters were killed or detained by the so-called Awakening Forces, but there are thousands who will never quit fighting until this occupation is ended. I believe it is a new strategy employed by the resistance to reduce the suffering of people in al-Anbar and move somewhere else to fight.”
Attacks against U.S. forces have increased notably in other Iraqi provinces like Diyala, Saladin and Mosul.
Source | informationliberation | Mirage Of Improvement In Iraq
Speaking on condition of anonymity, a 32 year old Ramadi resident cautioned my Iraqi colleague, al-Fadhily, “those Americans thought they would decrease the resistance attacks by separating the people of Iraq into sects and tribes. They are going deeper into the shifting sand. The collaborators are fooling the Americans right now, and will in the end use this strategy against them.”
Provinces like Saladin, Diyala and the Kurdish controlled north, now under regular bombardment from the Turkish military which is threatening invasion, have become more volatile than ever.
The Bush administration talks of withdrawing up to 5,000 troops from Diyala province, but on November 24 US military officials revealed that the overall number of American troops in Diyala will actually increase since the replacement brigade for the one being removed is larger and will mean more boots on the ground.
Source | informationliberation | Mirage Of Improvement In Iraq
Before swallowing the Bush administration rhetoric of things getting better in Iraq today, we would do well to cast a glance at the real picture of the calamitous occupation.
The Just Foreign Policy group in the US places over 1.1 million Iraqis dead as a direct result of the US led invasion and occupation. A conservative estimate of the wounded would be 3 million.
The UNHCR enlists an approximate 2.2 million Iraqis that have fled the country altogether, and another 2.4 million that have been internally displaced. An Oxfam International report released in July found another 4 million Iraqis who were in need of emergency assistance.
Iraq’s population at the time of the US invasion in March 2003 was roughly 27 million, and today it is approximately 23 million. Elementary arithmetic indicates that currently over half the population of Iraq are either refugees, in need of emergency aid, wounded, or dead.
While the US establishment media proffers us the assurance of “Baghdad’s Weary Start to Exhale as Security Improves,” for most Iraqis safe and secure survival remains a distant dream. For Americans it is perhaps time to act on the words of Carl Schurz and “cling to the watchword of true patriotism: ‘Our country — when right to be kept right; when wrong to be put right.’”