It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Didn't you watch the video by the photographer? He shows the two different images, with the same elements in each one. He wasn't trying to explain a stereo effect but he took them sequentially flying in an airplane which would give each photo a slightly different perspective, right? So if you wanted to make a stereo image you could use the two source photos he points out in his youtube video, see time 5:57:
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
I did a little bit of research into the stereoscopic footage and I discovered it is indeed real stereoscopic footage, both images show the clouds from slightly different angles. That means if the clouds were superimposed from a 2D image, the artist must have done something to slightly alter the clouds for each image.
So there are two photos right there which individually are not stereo, but could be presented as such since taken from a plane they will be at slightly different angles as the plane flies. He also shows one of the photos has to be manipulated to match the hoax video which had apparently changed the aspect ratio but when that is corrected it's an exact match.
5:57
I think the footage... the photo that was used in the footage is either this one or this one it could have been either because the element I believe it's this area is in both
Keeping an open mind is good, but not so open your brain falls out. My point was the proof was conclusive enough for Kim Dotcom to pay out $100,000, seems pretty conclusive. As for making this go away, I see it as more like reactions to the flat earth hypothesis. We aren't going to make the flat earth hypothesis go away, but that doesn't stop people from trying to explain why the flat earth hypothesis is wrong. At this point I think there's about as much evidence the UFO abduction video is a hoax as there is the earth isn't flat, and both are about equal on the silliness factor. So I can't agree that people trying to expose either hoax should be presented as "trying to make it go away", it should be viewed as trying to explain why the hoax is a hoax and how we know that is so.
I will keep an open mind until I see some sort of conclusive proof, because something stinks here, and I see far too many people who seem obsessed with making this topic go away.
originally posted by: Unseendimension
www.youtube.com...
Start with this. It is enlightening.
a reply to: ChaoticOrder
So they not only distance themselves by calling the story "unbelievable", but then distance themselves even further by saying it describes "what he believes actually happened", meaning the author doesn't necessarily believe it.
Boyd Anderson the author of ‘Under the Radar 537-555’ joins me to share the unbelievable story of what he believes actually happened to missing Malaysian flight MH370, and Boyd swears it’s the truth. 537 murdered people aboard two flights. 55,500 tons of stolen gold. Swiss Jews. Rothschild semiconductor patents.
Does that make any sense to you? When Boeing gets an order for aircraft, it may be for dozens of planes for one customer, and they may all be very similar but each has a unique registration number. I thought everyone knew that making a single prototype always costs more than mass producing on an assembly line, is that what he's trying to say, he just figured that out? I really can't figure out what he's getting at with that statement.
Then I found out that Boeing who makes the 777, when they when they make a 777, they make duplicates, and uh, because it's cheaper.
The French Ministry of Justice has now officially, absolutely, definitely, postively confirmed that the piece of plane debris that washed up on the island of Réunion in late July belonged to MH370, the jetliner that disappeared in March 2014 with 237 people onboard.
It is "possible to say with certainty that the flaperon discovered on the Reunion Island on July 29 2015 corresponds to the one on MH370," the French Ministry of Justice said in a statement, according to Reuters.
That may be that Boyd Anderson believes what he's saying, and it may also be true that Ashton Forbes (the MH370 was abducted by UFOs guy) believes what he's saying. But, that doesn't really get you any closer to the truth, if they are both delusional, and both believe 100% in their delusions which are separated from reality, which by the way can't both be true because they are entirely different delusions.
originally posted by: Unseendimension
There have been a few videos of this guy on the web. There was one video interview that he did, where all of his body language was 100 percent honest.
originally posted by: StudioNada
it's possible China targeted that flight with EMP ray(s) at too high energy level or too many beams causing the aircraft to turn into Dark Matter and dissolve instantly... hence a CIA created video suggesting a 'portal' being activated and the aircraft teleported
originally posted by: charlyv
a reply to: Arbitrageur
What is it about the excellent MH380 video debunk, that so many just keep denying and cannot let it go?
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
So there are two photos right there which individually are not stereo, but could be presented as such since taken from a plane they will be at slightly different angles as the plane flies. He also shows one of the photos has to be manipulated to match the hoax video which had apparently changed the aspect ratio but when that is corrected it's an exact match.