It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
originally posted by: strongfp
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
originally posted by: LordAhriman
Wildfires are liberals fault now too?
Yeah, it's the libtarded party. Neca eos omnes, deus suos agnoscet.
Did you see the wildfire satellite imagery from Quebec? Twenty fires started some hundreds of miles apart from "lightning strikes" from a clear blue cloudless sky above the fire locations. Yeah, that's going to happen. There's 6 hours of video before all the simultaneous fires were started, no storm clouds. So this is just the libtarded party in Ottawaski controlled by the WEF through the Prime Moron to push the arson, errrr, I mean climate agenda.
Bitchute link
Cheers - Dave
Wut?
Wut is not to understand? My CO used to say, "Once is happenstance, twice coincidence, but three times is enemy action." I'm sorry to say, he might have been sort of right back then in the 80s/90s, but not now. There are no coincidences, I don't there never was. There is only happenstance and enemy action. If you don't recognize we are in a war and prepare accordingly, God help you.
Cheers - Dave
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
originally posted by: strongfp
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
originally posted by: LordAhriman
Wildfires are liberals fault now too?
Yeah, it's the libtarded party. Neca eos omnes, deus suos agnoscet.
Did you see the wildfire satellite imagery from Quebec? Twenty fires started some hundreds of miles apart from "lightning strikes" from a clear blue cloudless sky above the fire locations. Yeah, that's going to happen. There's 6 hours of video before all the simultaneous fires were started, no storm clouds. So this is just the libtarded party in Ottawaski controlled by the WEF through the Prime Moron to push the arson, errrr, I mean climate agenda.
Bitchute link
Cheers - Dave
Wut?
Wut is not to understand? My CO used to say, "Once is happenstance, twice coincidence, but three times is enemy action." I'm sorry to say, he might have been sort of right back then in the 80s/90s, but not now. There are no coincidences, I don't there never was. There is only happenstance and enemy action. If you don't recognize we are in a war and prepare accordingly, God help you.
Cheers - Dave
Something strange about the maui fires. houses were burning first.the fire wasnt spreading normally.
originally posted by: igloo
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: CriticalStinker
What they didn’t count on was users of bitchute catching on. The comment section there is one of the most intelligent analytical breakdowns on this event. It comes to no surprise,some of the internet’s top minds are there.
I haven't laughed so hard for days , thanks for that.
Where would you suggest people post videos if they are getting censored on the big ones like Youtube...
Theres a lot of garbage for sure but in among it is all the stuff that is censored. It sucks to wade through it but to find the whole truth we need to see censored material.
originally posted by: Dolby_X
another fun fact about our fire here in Québec ... not about this year specificaly but top cause are lightning .. trains, yes train !!! i lived in Clova when i was young my father was the train station guy ... me bed was about 10 feets away from the track i often see wheel read hot because the brake of one train car got stuck but the train is so long the operator cant see it this type of event start alot of fire when it's dry to it can goes for hundreds of km like that .. and human playing with fire in a dry wood ....
originally posted by: Dolby_X
a reply to: PurpleFox
Yes and there was a thunderstorm that day passing right there covering several hundred of km !!
here a good video showing what im telling your
twitter.com...
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
originally posted by: strongfp
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
originally posted by: LordAhriman
Wildfires are liberals fault now too?
Yeah, it's the libtarded party. Neca eos omnes, deus suos agnoscet.
Did you see the wildfire satellite imagery from Quebec? Twenty fires started some hundreds of miles apart from "lightning strikes" from a clear blue cloudless sky above the fire locations. Yeah, that's going to happen. There's 6 hours of video before all the simultaneous fires were started, no storm clouds. So this is just the libtarded party in Ottawaski controlled by the WEF through the Prime Moron to push the arson, errrr, I mean climate agenda.
Bitchute link
Cheers - Dave
Wut?
Wut is not to understand? My CO used to say, "Once is happenstance, twice coincidence, but three times is enemy action." I'm sorry to say, he might have been sort of right back then in the 80s/90s, but not now. There are no coincidences, I don't there never was. There is only happenstance and enemy action. If you don't recognize we are in a war and prepare accordingly, God help you.
Cheers - Dave
Something strange about the maui fires. houses were burning first.the fire wasnt spreading normally.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: bobs_uruncle
So you would rather a repeat of what happened in Maui ?
If I lived there, I wouldn't be leaving. I would be staying and trying to protect as much as I could, for myself and my neighbors.
But you're not there so that's easy to say.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
I was looking at current google maps, fire maps of Yellowknife, and there is only one indicator for fire across a big lake that stretches from north to south separating Yellowknife from that fire. The fire can't jump a miles wide lake. To get to Yellowknife it would have to follow a pretty obscure route to get there, and the winds would have to keep changing first to the west, then north quite a ways, then west, then south, and it have to go around lots of other lakes besides the huge lake which on the map looks like a nice firebreak.
According to this, it seems crazy to evacuate Yellowknife, or am I missing something?
originally posted by: dandandat2
originally posted by: igloo
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: CriticalStinker
What they didn’t count on was users of bitchute catching on. The comment section there is one of the most intelligent analytical breakdowns on this event. It comes to no surprise,some of the internet’s top minds are there.
I haven't laughed so hard for days , thanks for that.
Where would you suggest people post videos if they are getting censored on the big ones like Youtube...
Theres a lot of garbage for sure but in among it is all the stuff that is censored. It sucks to wade through it but to find the whole truth we need to see censored material.
If you don't like to be censored by Big Tech then build your own platform!
You built your own platform?
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
I was looking at current google maps, fire maps of Yellowknife, and there is only one indicator for fire across a big lake that stretches from north to south separating Yellowknife from that fire. The fire can't jump a miles wide lake. To get to Yellowknife it would have to follow a pretty obscure route to get there, and the winds would have to keep changing first to the west, then north quite a ways, then west, then south, and it have to go around lots of other lakes besides the huge lake which on the map looks like a nice firebreak.
According to this, it seems crazy to evacuate Yellowknife, or am I missing something?
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
I was looking at current google maps, fire maps of Yellowknife, and there is only one indicator for fire across a big lake that stretches from north to south separating Yellowknife from that fire. The fire can't jump a miles wide lake. To get to Yellowknife it would have to follow a pretty obscure route to get there, and the winds would have to keep changing first to the west, then north quite a ways, then west, then south, and it have to go around lots of other lakes besides the huge lake which on the map looks like a nice firebreak.
According to this, it seems crazy to evacuate Yellowknife, or am I missing something?
You are indeed missing something... the size of the fire. It's not that dot on the map. It's far bigger than that - 166,000 hectares.
Here's satellite images from August 16th Basically, they're surrounded by fires.
Here's a map of ALL the active fires in Canada (200 plus!) It's scary to contemplate.