How the fourth Reich was financed

Any student of history, might think it strange that after a major war, with the victors crying for the blood of the enemy leaders, a few seem to be sacrificed, but the kaiser Hirohito Napoleon Those involved with the major conflics,didnt seem to get lynched.So why not Adolph Hitler? The nazis looted Europe Boreman pushed much of the money into Neutral Argentina, and the money entered the international banking system.It got laundered.Along with top Nazi scientists. With an estimated thirty billion in todays money,couldnt that be loaned to Europe with strings attached to control the rebuilding? With testimony which has been ignored because of the current narative, we are seeing national socialist policies more and more as the present days progress.
Take the present conflict betwen Russia and the Ukraine, a Russia that didnt believe thet Hitler had died in the Bunker in Berlin, why would they when an escape tunnel from the suicide room led to the Berlin underground, and to a runway in the centre of Berlin, with a pilot that testified that he had flown Hitler and Eva to Denmark, who was ignored and said to be insane, but sane enough to fly transport aircraft.The last big conflict was full of contradictions where even the financing of the Nazi party was in great part by American millionairs who profited greatly from the conflict.Even Bernheart of the Netherlands was an SS officer, who seemed to miss any criticism after the conflict.So mabey this is groundhog day with the Russians fighting the revival of the past raising its head, or mabey its the same old, where the deaths will be forgotten in the rebuilding, when the good times roll after the great reset? Here is the full doco about the escape of Grey Wolf.... doubel equal sign so her is the URL www.youtube.com...

The last big conflict was full of contradictions where even the financing of the Nazi party was in great part by American millionairs who profited greatly from the conflict

Corporate millionaires like Ford. Why, profit alone? Partially. Another reason vast sums were funneled into the Nazi party was that those corporate millionaires feared something more than Hitler. They didn't fear him, they used him. What they feared was the revolution that had taken over Russia and was gaining popular support in other cities of Europe. They gve Hitler money to stop communism in it's tracks. Then, the tool got out of hand and had to be stopped as well.

a reply to: anonentity

Are you saying the Allies did not finance the rebuilding of Europe? Chiefly the USA and Russia on different sides of the boarder.

Then where did all the money from the USA go?

a reply to: beyondknowledge2

Well Britain was in debt to America until the nineties, Europe was pillaged, and the nazi's first trick was to get the gold From the occupied countries. Boreman funneled it back into the world banking system via Argentina. Gold was money, it then gets funneled into America to become the Marshal Plan, It was no coincidence that this war then shifts its focus onto defeating communism. Theirs two tiers going on here. Money finances politics. Now the West is looking a lot like corporate fascism that had to come from somewhere, like money with strings attached. Poor people will do anything for money, they just don't realize that poverty is intellectual to a great extent.

a reply to: anonentity

It’s close to unreadable. If you can’t put a little effort into making it readable, I’m inclined to match that effort and not bother.

a student of history knows that Hitler appeared at the far end of the new liberal arc when liberalism collapsed under its own arrogant weight.. the same with the Stalinists and fascists..

so those new liberals backed all these evolving groups so they remained relevant just as they do now but they also sow the seeds of their own demise..

worth remembering that ww1 was a globalist liberal war between liberal factions that collapsed new liberalism and evolved into Stalinism in Russia, Nazism in Germany and the conservative/lib unionists in the uk..

everything we see then and now is due to the liberal stream of eugenics tinkering to create the perfect class of slave, but being so far up their own bums they never understand the true consequences of their actions.

my concern is their self hate and imminent collapse will again a new monster.. who'll really run with the liberal love of experimenting and mutilating others..

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire

The last big conflict was full of contradictions where even the financing of the Nazi party was in great part by American millionairs who profited greatly from the conflict

Corporate millionaires like Ford. Why, profit alone? Partially. Another reason vast sums were funneled into the Nazi party was that those corporate millionaires feared something more than Hitler. They didn't fear him, they used him. What they feared was the revolution that had taken over Russia and was gaining popular support in other cities of Europe. They gve Hitler money to stop communism in it's tracks. Then, the tool got out of hand and had to be stopped as well.

how did that situating happen when new liberalism was the dominant political form for the previous 100 years.. the main powers on both sides during ww1 where liberals..

it was the abject failure of new liberalism that birthed these other groups.. and equally we are seeing similar groups being birthed by new liberalism today, we can all name the modern counter parts of Stalinism, fascism and nazism..

Who says we are not financing the 4th reich right now?

I often look at our policies in America and our media...propaganda. add in operation paperclip and i think we are the 4th reich. TBO

a reply to: theatreboy

given we're replicating the arc that led to the last lot of nasties in the 1930s its safe to say then like now liberalism is funding it all as it flounders..

a reply to: anonentity

with a pilot that testified that he had flown Hitler and Eva to Denmark, who was ignored and said to be insane, but sane enough to fly transport aircraft.The last big conflict was full of contradictions where even the

the pilot captain peter baumgart lied, there is no way he could have landed in Magdeburg where he said. because it was under U.S. control by 9th US Army troops . from 18 April 1945 until control transferred to the USSR in 1 July1945. other german pilots who were stationed there also said he was captured 10 days before he claimed to have flown hitler out. he claimed he flew them out on 27 Apr1945 stopped at Magdeburg due to allied bombing and then to denmark on the 28th.

a reply to: BernnieJGato

Of course, his statement would have to be contradicted once it became public knowledge. Why would the Nazis have had a little Germany in Argentina? simply because fighting a war on two fronts was suicide, and the job had been done Europe had been looted. Peron paid off to supply new identities. Adolf Hitler was a brand.

originally posted by: theatreboy
Who says we are not financing the 4th reich right now?

I often look at our policies in America and our media...propaganda. add in operation paperclip and i think we are the 4th reich. TBO

I’ve dubbed it exactly that[4th Reich] going on probably almost 10 years now. I’m sure there’s been plenty of ways they’ve invented to finance it. Taxes, Greenie Genie Deals, MEGa POwerballs etc

originally posted by: anonentity
Any student of history, might think it strange that after a major war, with the victors crying for the blood of the enemy leaders, a few seem to be sacrificed,

That's not strange, a lot of captured nazis and affiliated persons initially received notoriously harsh sentences, but this was relaxed considerably within a few years when reason and common sense asserted themselves again.

Even a war criminal like Churchill understood the principle of executing the leaders, but pardoning the masses and not carrying on punishments afterward, which is why even he was outraged by Morgenthau's plan at first.

originally posted by: anonentity
but the Kaiser, Hirohito, Napoleon, those involved with the major conflicts, didn't seem to get lynched. So why not Adolph Hitler?

You completely omitted the fact that Mussolini was lynched and paraded around, for which reason Hitler was worried about being captured. He also remembered how the Italians had treated their Popes. It was ironic when Hitler made an allusion to the Jews' Race, where Jews were seated on donkeys and paraded around on the streets. www.haaretz.com...

originally posted by: anonentity
With testimony which has been ignored because of the current narrative, we are seeing national socialist policies more and more as the present days progress.

Oh, we're not even there yet. When people start leaving out their infants on the streets, when everyone is talking about being sterilized, when little boys are encouraged to get into brawls, when children are forcibly taken from their parents to be schooled by the state, etc., that's when Nazi policies have returned.

Otto Strasser furnishes by far the most damning testimony that Hitler attempted to literally resurrect the Spartan state model. Hitler believed Sparta failed because it was governed by a clique of aristocrats, not by a tyrant.

What Hitler intended for the Slavic peoples was worse than what befell the Jews, they would've been enslaved and reduced to helots, their youth would never learn anything about politics, being wholly deprived of education. Nazis intended to keep them divided by controlling priests and promoting the formation of religious sects. This is all laid down in notes jotted down during Hitler's table talk. It's astonishing how much they kept this plan under wraps, their leaders turned down proposals to play Russians against each other, a policy which Stalin benefited from: www.dropbox.com...

Not even Mussolini's attempt to resurrect the Roman empire remained as faithful to his ancient model as Hitler's policies did. Mussolini betrayed on his principles by invading Greece out of jealousy and frustration with Hitler, a desperate need to show up Hitler and prove that he could accomplish similar feats on his own. The modern Fascism which has been overtaken by Christianity has no roots in ancient Roman conceptions.

originally posted by: anonentity
Take the present conflict between Russia and the Ukraine... So maybe this is groundhog day with the Russians fighting the revival of the past raising its head,

Ukrainian Nazis can be regarded as an actual threat, whereas neo-nazis in the West are presently impotent and irrelevant in politics.

A Russian friend of mine, who is a historian, informed me how the trauma associated with Nazism was still fresh in Russia, whereas in the West, Hitler was merely being used as a label to discredit people they don't like and the spectre of Nazism was a "media trick" to incite hatred between people. He wrote:

[But we in Russia still remember the true meaning of the words "Nazism, fascism and Hitler." The price has been paid too much to be forgotten and forgiven. We have monuments everywhere about the events of those times. There is not a single city where there are no graves of victims of fascists or the "Eternal Flame" does not burn. Almost every family keeps photographs, letters from the front smelling of gunpowder and tobacco, fragments and bullets extracted from wounds missing to the heart, old prosthetic arms and legs with which grandfathers walked until the end of their days, German trophies, and of course awards or "funerals-letters".]

His explanation for Russian neo-nazis was that they are "mostly sectarians or self-asserting teenagers who have fallen under the influence of new age movements and alternative Slavophile sects. Their Nazism wears off with age. This is not an idea, it is rather a fashion for informality, for being different from everyone else. The maximum limit of their activity is serious hooliganism and criminal violations of law and order, which the police quickly deal with."

originally posted by: anonentity
Even Bernheart of the Netherlands was an SS officer, who seemed to miss any criticism after the conflict.

Prince Bernhard was obviously never a real devoted SS member, a lot of people conformed to avoid being accused as an enemy of the state. Hitler was never convinced of Bernhard's loyalty. Reportedly: "A couple of days later he declared in the Dutch press that in his heart he had always felt himself a Dutchman."

Nazi banker Hjalmar Schacht being pardoned is arguably a more interesting rabbit-hole to follow.

originally posted by: anonentity
with a pilot that testified that he had flown Hitler and Eva to Denmark, who was ignored and said to be insane, but sane enough to fly transport aircraft.

What's this alleged pilot's name? Hans Baur was Hitler's personal pilot, he tried to persuade him that there were still planes and that Argentine, Japan, and Arabic countries would've gladly received him. In response, Hitler said he could flee into the mountains or rendezvous with Donitz, but that'd merely be delaying the inevitable.

Winston Churchill, Albert Speer, and August Kubizek regarded Rudolf Hess as closest to Hitler, having access to him in his most intimate moments. Hess pointed out that if Hitler had escaped, he would never be forgiven and received by his remaining fanatical followers in Germany, who'd have perceived it as a betrayal.

Fact: SS members were systematically targeted for elimination.

Fact: Confirmed deaths of Nazi leaders Goebbels, Goering, Himmler, etc. The only one seemingly unaccounted for is Bormann, but he was really a yes-man who tried to please Hitler.

Fact: The few influential persons (Otto Ernst Remer, Hans-Ulrich Rudel) who remained loyal to Hitler came out into the open in their struggle against the German government, they did not go underground and attempt subversion of the state.

Theory: If a 4th Reich actually exists, it's probably run by the families of former Wehrmacht generals/veterans, former military-intelligence personnel (Abwehr, Gestapo), former communists, former Weimar officials, etc. Those who were on the periphery of Nazi high command.

Testimony from intelligence officer Hans Bernd Gisevius, who supported the July 20 plot:

"The occupation powers have allowed the Communists, who were the most consistent opponents of the German political system that prevailed between 1918 and 1933, a significant share in the work of reconstruction. This policy implies that the powers do not consider open opposition to the principles, customs, and legal codes of the Weimar Republic a damning fault."

a reply to: anonentity

Lastly, my colleague WanderingMrM has warned about a certain "Sector 8", allegedly consisting of the offspring of old Nazi high command (but imo, they're from the periphery).

- Most of it is run by old Nazis a.k.a Sector 8 (S8), consisting of old Nazi high command and their kids + grandkids running the show now. Germany still has a way out but their new blood that is replacing old are parasitic rats placed there to ensure that Germany does not take a step back and reunites with Russia. The Americans did the pipeline because the Nazi leadership in the U.S and their shadow masters deemed the Germans a threat and by instigating this event they solidified their assessment that "Germany might switch sides and side with Russia".

- Most of these individuals are now moving their wealth to China as I have mentioned before that the rats will jump ship and move their assets to China.
___

When I tried to investigate his claim, these names turned up: James Critchfield, Reinhard Gehlen, Hartmann Lauterbacher, Klaus Barbie, Emil Augsburg, Rudolf Mildner. I also downloaded a copy of Hitler's Shadow: Nazi War Criminals, U.S. Intelligence, and the Cold War.

The Soviet Union was a British project.

a reply to: ethnicpurity

The Soviet Union was a British project.

Of course it was, ha ha ha.

Nice name by the way.

a reply to: ethnicpurity

How so? Do tell?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: ethnicpurity

How so? Do tell?

It's obvious when you consider who the primary rival of the Soviet Union was. Nothing much has changed since its collapse either.