Russell Warns Of Technocratic Enslavement.

Whatever your thoughts on Russell thought he did a mighty fine job in this new video of exploring the upcoming technocratic nightmare they're attempting to impose on everyone in the near future.

There's also some quite funny observations on a recent speech given by Goldman Sachs / WEF puppet (and UK PM) Rishi Sunak.. I laughed anyway.

As governments globally are on the precipice of introducing digital IDs, do we need to worry that the same technology used to impede our freedom with vaccine passports will now be used to control every element of our lives?

Spoiler alert… we do.

Hope folks manage to watch the vid (if they can) and thought it was pretty relevant as members on these boards have been warning about this sort of thing for the last 15 years... only to be flippantly dismissed (by some) as 'conspiracy theorists'.



Related vids:

• CBDC Enslavement

• SCS Enslavement 1 / 2

• VHS Vid : WEF Controlled Demolition Of First World Economies

Been seeing some pretty insane videos featuring the chat GPT AI that's been all over lately. Everything from having it stock trade to producing music. Its not great yet but it jas come a long long way in a very short time.

Technocratic panopticon! I’ve been saying that for literal years!

Except I call it techno-fascist panopticon
a reply to: karl 12

All you will truly own will be what you have on your person at any given moment and even that will be under their scrutiny and control when these things get rolling. That Chinese report he was showing was being more truthful than the western media, his analysis focused in on the relevant key words and phrases.

I love the irony....

"People using technology [www] to warn us about the evils of technology." Then singing the praises of Elon Musk taking over twitter...lol!

Just like a gun can be used for good or evil.

I know the concept is lost on you.

a reply to: olaru12

Save for a small minority of discerning souls, mankind is hopelessly lost.

The disconnect from reality is beyond bizarre.

ironically it was liberalism that warned us of so its rster strange that liberalism is the one that wants tro enslave the worlds poor to their whim and experiments..

Belloc is an interesting one as he saw it we're on a road back to being slaves to the Roman church.. the middle class and wealth have been after undoing both the reformation and road to enlightenment/freedom.

It was the Faith which gradually and indirectly transformed the slave into the serf, and the serf into the free peasant... You will not be able to set up in a pagan or an heretical or a wholly indifferent society the institutions characteristic of economic freedom; you will not be able to curb competition which alone would be sufficient to destroy such freedom, nor pursue permanently and consecutively any one part of the program. The thing must be done as a whole, and it can be done as a whole only by the ambient influence of Catholicism.
Hilaire Belloc, CRISIS OF CIVILIZATION

dig underneath nothing of what is happening is free of roman Catholic influence in enslaving the masses..

Thank you for sharing that video.

While Mr. Brand has impressed me with his consistency, intellect, and genuine communications style, I sometimes disagree with his focus... this is not one of those times.

To me this is clearly a case of communities which do not communicate meaningfully.

The technological advances which are being promoted by the "elite" ruling class in the example provided adheres to typical marketing communication. The community of elites is executing an attempt to show only the "good" of the technology, after having conditioned those "not in the big club" to suspect them of exploitation and abuse. We could, and Mr. Russel has, identified a litany of 'bad ends' this could come to. The laundry list extends into the worst possible manifestations of abuse of governance, and even the degradation of the human condition via (or at least due to) the "tokenization' of human data.

Now we could line up the bad and good, spreadsheet-style and try to reconcile the values of one or the other and decide whether that's acceptable... but the human condition was never about metrics, it never has been. Some will applaud, some will boo. It is a cycle we endure whenever the technological impacts the social.

If we lived in a Gene Rodenberry world of cashless egalitarianism, this could work to manage our affairs nicely. But we don't. If we lived in a totalitarian regime, this could work to manage our affairs nicely. But we don't...

In the end it's about how it's implemented and whether it will be a weapon, or a responsibility. We can already imagine which it will be for those people in power. How do we make use of a technology which will immediately be employed to increase the reach of those in power?

Note that technology will only exacerbate abuse and extend the reach of those most eager to "manage" it.

Add to that the revenue it will represent to people already lining up to exploit it... and how much they are willing to "invest" in political' good will... "Huston, we have a problem."

The more measurable overt resistance they register, the more likely we will begin to see sensationalized examples of why it is essential we accept it. When the think-tanks sponsor fluff pieces about this tech ... come back to this video and listen sagaciously.

I suppose there is some criticism against what some may regard as the 'doom porn' flavor of the delivery, this 'warning' is both timely and relevant. There is an increasing desperation to the urgency with which these kinds of 'global body' pronouncements are being delivered. Their pronouncements are consistently delivered via a media who implicitly imbues them with "authority" despite their existence as "international bodies" with no true public constituencies (i.e., they are not elected, but appointed by people with power.)

Once the digital ID is real, assuming it takes the shape and form most desirable to those supporting it, your freedom to operate in the virtual world of the internet for example, will be a matter of whim... someone you don't know can just "turn you off." I don't like that reality.

I will admit, I took exception that when saying things like "... CIA and FBI involvement in platforms like Twitter..." he adds after a slight pause ... "and other platforms, also." He is mimicking traditional media in never specifying which "other" platforms we should be concerned about, namely: Facebook, Tik Tok, You Tube, Instagram... MAJOR platforms, not just "other." But that's just me... a conspiracy theorist who by that name is supposed to mean "inconsequentially insignificant," judging by how painstakingly he refuses the designation.

MM

a reply to: ColeYounger

its been in play since globalist new liberalism failed in 1922/23... the attempt in the 70s was really half arsed.. but this tendency of accepting trying to legitimise certain groups extreme predilections always ends a car crash...

It may not be as bad as you think. One group is silenced and censored by all platforms while the other is amplified. Look at how upset one side is when the veil was lifted off of just one single platform. It order for the panopticon to function there can’t be any fair play. There may be more people awake then we realize but we cannot hear or see them.

The panopticon in action. Instilling the belief one is a marginal minority or even in opposition of society can erode the conviction of said beliefs. People naturally want to be part of group and this is social engineering at work.

a reply to: ColeYounger

a reply to: nickyw

dig underneath nothing of what is happening is free of roman Catholic influence in enslaving the masses..

Well, all roads lead to Rome....

www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: Athetos

Technocratic panopticon! I’ve been saying that for literal years!

Except I call it techno-fascist panopticon

Pretty good description mate and appreciate the post!





Did laugh at this one.

originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck

All you will truly own will be what you have on your person at any given moment and even that will be under their scrutiny and control when these things get rolling. That Chinese report he was showing was being more truthful than the western media, his analysis focused in on the relevant key words and phrases.

Yep truly disturbing stuff my friend - the UN (and affiliate WEF) certainly have some insane ideas for the future but when it comes to the abolition of private ownership then found the founding documents below very familiar sounding indeed.



Video

a reply to: Maxmars

the problem is we as humans keep repeating the same issues as the rich/middle class want a return of a subservient servant class.

so they keep circling back to those things in the 20th century it was in the Late Victorian to the 30s and then again 1960s to 70s both periods you have similar academics/rich planning ways to cleanse their world of the bad genes that lead under classes to think for themselves.

the thing with Russel is he is a George Orwell like thinker hating his own class and highlighting their hatred of the poor. we even see it in this century when Blair held a conference in London like the eugenic ones in the 1912s, in 2017 they calculated that at least 2 million vulnerable Brits had to die to ensure they could return control to the EU..

the issue remains the types of groups that piggy back these attempts tend to kill off the attempts as they end up in ever more extreme places either galloping towards paedophilia and/or genocide that wider society tends to reject out of hand..

in the 1910 the academics/middle class/aristocrats wanted to sterilise/eradicate the poor who a few years latter they needed in the trenches to fight their war, Kipling, Belloc, Chesterton along with Orwell documented the changes we'd recognise happening today as we would with the mindsets of academics like Keynes Fisher, Galton, Beveridge etc who felt their science was totally settled

a reply to: olaru12

the arc is quite obvious as is the trajectory back to roman style slavery and serfdom if not genocide..

a reply to: karl 12

Russell has turned into one heck of an independent journalist/reporter.

CBDC and Digital ID and it's all over.

originally posted by: Maxmars

I will admit, I took exception that when saying things like "... CIA and FBI involvement in platforms like Twitter..." he adds after a slight pause ... "and other platforms, also." He is mimicking traditional media in never specifying which "other" platforms we should be concerned about, namely: Facebook, Tik Tok, You Tube, Instagram... MAJOR platforms, not just "other."

Thanks to you (and everybody else) for the thoughtful input and think Russell may just be being careful because he's on his last YouTube violation warning but fair point nonetheless.

Hell maybe from its very inception the internet was designed as a control mechanism - who knows?

One things for sure, the Military Intel agencies have been balls deep in Silicon Valley for a very long time.

a reply to: MykeNukem

he reminds me of a modern Belloc, Kipling, Chesterton or Orwell challenging the status quo..

a reply to: karl 12

Hell maybe from its very inception the internet was designed as a control mechanism - who knows?

the establishment has been trying to regain control since they lost it in the reformation and then it evolved into an agreement of the people which formed the basis of the usa and "we the people"

there is distinct hatred of populism because both the agreement of the people and we the people are the places populism ends up in..

its interesting we are almost repeating parts of the reformation and what I kind of find interesting is how Musk is leading a dissolution of the monasteries, there is very little between their dogma virtues, relics and charms to our dogma, virtues relics and charms..

Belloc doesn't take our capitalism back to the reformation but to the dissolution of the monasteries and their power to shape society

originally posted by: Athetos
Just like a gun can be used for good or evil.

I know the concept is lost on you.

a reply to: olaru12
A

Son, Not entirely...

I'm a big fan of standing your ground, the 2nd amendment and the Bill of Rights. Step on my property unannounced and let's see if I'm familiar with the concept.