Mueller and Rosenstein Conspired to Target Trump for Obstructing Justice...From Day 1.

a reply to: carewemust

Except for one big BUT.....
Mueller wasn't eligible to replace Comey.

He had a special agreement under Obama to extend his appointment but that didn't extend beyond Obamas presidency.
The law is no more than ten years.
Mueller has already served for two more over that.

a reply to: watchitburn

Funny how hundreds of federal investigators and prosecutors say differently... Like he would be in jail in not for that DOJ rule about indicting a sitting president.

Ignore that part all you want it doesn't change the truth one iota.

originally posted by: sunkuong
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

If you try to prevent an investigation through obstructive means, it doesnt matter if you committed the crime being investigated yourself or not. The act of obstruction is the crime.

You are not following, and I don't know why. You can not START an investigation with obstruction. You need to start with a valid investigation. Since collusion is not a crime, as Democrat Senator Leahy admitted, what was the initial crime being investigated?

a reply to: carewemust

The headline does not make it true.

originally posted by: sunkuong
a reply to: rickymouse

That is quite an if. I cant think of any previous examples to compare that to....

Hillary. She refused to hand over evidence, and destroyed quite a bit of it. Was obstruction filed against her, since we have actual obstruction?

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: sunkuong

The HEADLINE is that Bob Mueller started investigating President Trump for obstructing justice on Day #1, even though the document describing Mueller's "job" didn't include investigating "Obstruction of Justice".

To make matter worse, Rosenstein and Mueller LIED to the President's attorneys, when they said, "President Trump is NOT a Target of the Mueller Investigation".

Lying to White House attorneys, is just as criminal as lying to attorneys on Bob Mueller's team.

Several people were indicted for lying to Mueller's attorneys.

Mueller and Rosenstein should be indicted for lying to White House attorneys.

Sunshine is the most effective tactic against corruption.
They thought he would be charged.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Yeah whats your point?

Just because someone posts a story saying the cart was before the horse does not mean it really happened that way.
Consider the source before taking the whole thing as true.
The original source not CWM. of course.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: watchitburn

Funny how hundreds of federal investigators and prosecutors say differently... Like he would be in jail in not for that DOJ rule about indicting a sitting president.

Ignore that part all you want it doesn't change the truth one iota.

Hundreds say different, and all the rest agree with Barr. There are 93 offices, each with up to 350 federal prosecutors. So about 1% think Trump would have been charged, the other 99% agree with Barr. Hey, you are finally in the 1%, congrats.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

She never refused to turn over anything.
And she did not destroy evidence either.
Thats just a popular conspriacy theory around these parts.
Goes with the territory.

a reply to: Sillyolme

I agree, I want evidence. If it did happen, you admit that is a huge problem right?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

She never refused to turn over anything.
And she did not destroy evidence either.
Thats just a popular conspriacy theory around these parts.
Goes with the territory.

She decided what to turn over, and thousands were later found she did not turn over. Stop lying. Did trump get to decide what evidence Mueller got?

a reply to: carewemust

The paper trail is going to hang them.
How can the fbi investigate obstruction when no crime was committed, why was the fbi investigating obstruction for something the AG and Deputy AG recommended be done?

Lots of trouble here for RR and bobby 2 sticks. Especially when the date is revealed when they stopped the "collusion" investigation much earlier than the midterms and kept the investigation open to influence the midterms.

Mr. Comey writes that he learned on that day the details about the discovery, on Anthony Weiner’s laptop, of new and potentially significant Clinton email evidence — “hundreds of thousands” of emails, including “thousands” that the F.B.I. had never seen before

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: watchitburn

Funny how hundreds of federal investigators and prosecutors say differently... Like he would be in jail in not for that DOJ rule about indicting a sitting president.

Ignore that part all you want it doesn't change the truth one iota.

Funny how when thousands of engineers/aviation experts chimed in disputing the 9/11 report, they were ignored, but when a few hundred partisan hacks who used to be federal investigators chime in, we must listen.... makes sense..

a reply to: shooterbrody

Yeah it is.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Wait wait wait.... where are those hundreds saying otherwise? Because they are being suspiciously silent friend.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

No I don't.
The fact was he was appointed after the firing of Comey and that was the original reason.
This is just a drama piece trying to paint a nefarious picture of a perfectly legal proceeding.
Par for the course.
distract misdirect obfuscate

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

No you stop....The emails on Abedin's computer were only duplicates of the ones they already had.
Dont try to fool me dude.
She didnt refuse and she didnt destroy. That is total bullschitte.
It always has been.

a reply to: Sillyolme

distract misdirect obfuscate

yeah
using court documents always does that?
did you even read the op?
www.cnn.com...
lol
these are court records
your bs morning joe spin won't work on them

originally posted by: vinifalou

originally posted by: sunkuong
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

If you try to prevent an investigation through obstructive means, it doesnt matter if you committed the crime being investigated yourself or not. The act of obstruction is the crime.

If you're being falsely accused of committing a crime, and these people are trying to set you up to destroy your life, you will obviously try to get rid of these corrupt people.

Yeah, Trump's a real Jesus Christ, an innocent being led to the slaughter for our own sins. Trump never did nothin wrong!

I would do the same Trump did and I'm pretty sure the Democrats would as well.

The law isn't partisan, and that rationale didn't work for Bill Clinton. We'll see if that defense works for Roger Stone!