Mueller and Rosenstein Conspired to Target Trump for Obstructing Justice...From Day 1.

May 8, 2019

Now we know why Bob Mueller and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein met with President Trump for 4 hours, the day before Rod Rosenstein appointed Bob Mueller as Special Counsel.

President Trump said the meeting was because Bob Mueller wanted to be considered as James Comey's replacement as FBI Director.

In reality, unbeknownst to the President, Bob Mueller was INTERVIEWING President Trump...not the other way around!

Unsealed court documents show that Bob Mueller was gathering information in order to build an Obstruction of Justice case against President Trump.

The day after Bob Mueller's "job interview", Rod Rosenstein appointed him as Special Counsel. The official reason for appointing Mueller as Special Counsel was to investigate Russian Interference, and any Collusion between Trump's campaign and Russia.

But the #1 GOAL was to gather enough evidence to charge President Trump with Obstruction, thereby leading to his Impeachment.

On January 22nd, 2018, eleven months prior to the mid-term election, lawyers from the special counsel’s office told Judge Boasberg in a sealed-courtroom, why they needed to keep James Comey’s memos from being released.

Special Counsel Attorney Michael Dreeben informed the court the special counsel was charged with investigating an obstruction case against President Trump from the beginning. President Trump was the target of their investigation from the outset.

Despite Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein and Special Counsel Mueller assuring the President and his lawyers he was not the target of the investigation, they were lying.

As soon as the court was told Trump was the target (hearing January 22, 2018) the court agreed to seal everything relating to the journal of James Comey.

Image of Court Documents at: theconservativetreehouse.com...

As these revelations occur, the missing puzzle pieces fall into place. Last month we learned that the FBI had already cleared the Trump campaign of colluding with Russia, before Mueller was appointed.

The fake Dossier (insurance policy) was used to justify more investigating, and dragging everyone in Trump's orbit back into Russian collusion suspicion.

But the real goal was taking down a sitting U.S. President with at least one charge of Obstructing Justice. That's why, as Judge Ellis stated, Mueller's team was "putting the screws" to Trump's people. Attempting to make them say things that would help Mueller's team implicate the President.

As we know, Bob Mueller found some incidents that could be considered as Obstructing Justice. But as hard as he tried, for almost 3 years, Mueller concluded that none of those incidents rose to the level of being chargeable.

Attorney General William Barr will now determine if including President Trump in the Special Counsel's Russia Investigation, was LEGAL or ILLEGAL. If the inclusion was based on the Trump-Russian Dossier that Hillary Clinton paid for, what Rosenstein/Mueller plotted was a COUP against President Trump. Heads will roll!

-CareWeMust

a reply to: carewemust

So trump obstructs justice....and he's investigated for that among other things....

Isnt that how this works? Whats the problem?

a reply to: sunkuong

Mueller's list of 10 possible, maybe, could be, if you squint really hard "obstruction" were laughable.

And then the whole thing was a sham rigged by the leftists in the first place. Based on democrat lies. There shouldn't have even been an investigation to possibly, maybe, could be, if you squint really hard "obstruct".

a reply to: sunkuong

The HEADLINE is that Bob Mueller started investigating President Trump for obstructing justice on Day #1, even though the document describing Mueller's "job" didn't include investigating "Obstruction of Justice".

To make matter worse, Rosenstein and Mueller LIED to the President's attorneys, when they said, "President Trump is NOT a Target of the Mueller Investigation".

Lying to White House attorneys, is just as criminal as lying to attorneys on Bob Mueller's team.

Several people were indicted for lying to Mueller's attorneys.

Mueller and Rosenstein should be indicted for lying to White House attorneys.

a reply to: carewemust

It is a conspiracy site. Youre in the right place at least

a reply to: carewemust

I heard he was completely exonerated. So whats left to worry about except promises kept?

originally posted by: sunkuong
a reply to: carewemust

I heard he was completely exonerated. So whats left to worry about except promises kept?

How about that it even happened in the first place?
People within your government broke the law or at the very least manipulated it into trying to disgrace a democratically elected president because they didnt like him.
It wasnt the will of the people or the right thing to do, it just suited them.
These are the people behind the scenes of your government and you ask whats left to worry about?

originally posted by: sunkuong
a reply to: carewemust

I heard he was completely exonerated. So whats left to worry about except promises kept?

Right on time with the new talking point.
How suprising.

a reply to: sunkuong

Trump obstructed justice in an investigation that has not even happened yet? How can you obstruct an investigation that has not started?

As Leahy stated, collusion is not a crime, so what crime was being investigated?

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

You can obstruct it by trying to prevent it. Possibly

originally posted by: sunkuong
a reply to: carewemust

It is a conspiracy site. Youre in the right place at least

But no matter where you are, you should be able to add two plus two together and always get four.

Pretty simple math.

Granted, there are a lot of anti Trumpers who really need 2 + 2 to equal 13.

a reply to: sunkuong

It can't start to begin until you have done something to obstruct it, which you can't do until it has started to begin. You can not start an investigation on the basis of that investigation being obstructed. It's circular reasoning.

What we had was an investigation with no crime. That is not America. That's illegal. Democrats are even now admitting collusion is not a crime, there is literally no crime to investigate other than Obstruction, which legally can not start the investigation.

So what crime was being investigated?

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

If you try to prevent an investigation through obstructive means, it doesnt matter if you committed the crime being investigated yourself or not. The act of obstruction is the crime.

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: sunkuong
a reply to: carewemust

It is a conspiracy site. Youre in the right place at least

But no matter where you are, you should be able to add two plus two together and always get four.

Pretty simple math.

Granted, there are a lot of anti Trumpers who really need 2 + 2 to equal 13.

Lol, if liberal media says 2+2=13, they'll believe it.

If they're going to try and accuse Trump of obstructing justice because his shadow faced the wrong direction..

.. then i thoroughly look forward to the day they investigate Hillary Clinton, Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin and Debbie Shultz for obstruction of justice over their efforts to destroy IT equipment and phones that had been subpoenaed by Congress

.. .. while we are at it lets look at the FBI obstructing justice for destroying text messages and phones related to Peter Strzok.

.. While we are at it, lets also investigate Platte River Networks for obstructing justice and Stone Tear for deleting online evidence proving they all lied about their efforts to change meta data and headers in emails.

.. While we are at it, lets also investigate.....

a reply to: Agit8dChop

Do you believe that it has or is not being investigated? Or not to your satisfaction?

originally posted by: sunkuong
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

If you try to prevent an investigation through obstructive means, it doesnt matter if you committed the crime being investigated yourself or not. The act of obstruction is the crime.

If you're being falsely accused of committing a crime, and these people are trying to set you up to destroy your life, you will obviously try to get rid of these corrupt people.

I would do the same Trump did and I'm pretty sure the Democrats would as well.

It's all about hypocrisy.

originally posted by: sunkuong
a reply to: Agit8dChop

Do you believe that it has or is not being investigated? Or not to your satisfaction?

Has?

Yes, by Rosenstein, Mccabe, Comey.. the very people being accused of obstructing justice and lying to FISA courts in order to frame their accuser, the President of the United States.

Is it?

I believe it is... I hope it is... I think Trump likes revenge - especially on corrupt douche bags who aim to destroy him.
He may have allowed it to slide, if the Democrats got over it and got onboard with his Presidency.. but the Left, Corrupt DOJ and Democratic worshipers went after his family, his business, his reputation, his wife, his children...

I hope he is p1ssed.. and determined to expose it all!

judging by how hard and dirty the democrats are acting in the senate and house... and how much money has been thrown at Hollywood and the media... im guessing they're petrified of Trump... he's been in power long enough now to have all the information...

If Trump would have been a Democrat, none of the obstruction of justice events would even have been investigated as obstruction of justice. The Dems would throw a fit if they did this to a Democratic president.

a reply to: rickymouse

That is quite an if. I cant think of any previous examples to compare that to....