Secret Door in Great Sphinx leading to the Hall of Records (Cover up!)

originally posted by: mcsnacks77
a reply to: Hanslune

The fact that technology declined from the time of the Egyptians and Romans shows that they were shown how to build the technology. They knew how to use all the materials around them but never improved on them because they had no reason to improve on them. They had free labor so they didn’t have to worry about overhead.
The purpose of technology is to make life easier but to them life was already easy. So they didn’t need blueprints or building designs just directions on how to use them. That makes sense. So I guess it was aliens the whole time.

Technology didn't decline it went up. Just look at Egyptian building versus the structures the Greek's and Roman's constructed. Superior to the Egyptian except in size (however, the Roman network of roads used more material than the GP), the Roman's also began to use water power for stone cutting and milling grain.

Roman water mills.

www.science.org...

en.wikipedia.org...

The Roman's greatly increased their knowledge of technology especially in what we would call engineering, incorporating a great deal of Greek knowledge into their methods. Leading to concrete, extensive use of bricks, vaults, arches and domes. Something the Egyptian had not done (they did have arches but few).

originally posted by: mcsnacks77
a reply to: Hanslune

Hence they wouldn’t want the truth to get out. Their whole tourism attraction is the mystery. That’s where 80% of their economic value derives from.

"Truth" yeah tourists wouldn't want to come and see Atlantean or Alien ruins? REALLY? I've been to Egypt 5 times and am currently not planning to go back as I've seen enough and my wife worked there for 3 years so no reason to go back NOW. However, if there were Atlantean or Aliens? Well I certainly go to see that.

a reply to: Hanslune

The decline came around 100 B.C. Until early Middle Ages.
And the improvements could have been because of the better materials they had available. Some Archaeologists are now saying Egyptians May have invented concrete and that’s how the pyramids were built. Pouring molds, from a kind of Portland cement so that they wouldn’t have had to move the heavy ass blocks.

a reply to: Hanslune

Not Atlantean or Aliens but if they let they truth out that the pyramids were just an earlier version of a power plant that produced a small amount of electricity. And they built the pyramids by just pouring molds and no heavy lifting.

Kinda like the cartoon the Flintstones. They had all the amenities we have but attained in simpler, and less modern ways

originally posted by: mcsnacks77
a reply to: Hanslune

The decline came around 100 B.C. Until early Middle Ages.
And the improvements could have been because of the better materials they had available. Some Archaeologists are now saying Egyptians May have invented concrete and that’s how the pyramids were built. Pouring molds, from a kind of Portland cement so that they wouldn’t have had to move the heavy ass blocks.

Oh, you mean in Egyptian Engineering only. Yep it was replaced in most aspects by Roman and Greek. Additionally in the pre-dynastic they weren't 'advanced' they developed their technology. It didn't pop into existence early on it developed.

Archaeologists? You must mean Davidovits and Barsoum, et al? Nope, its a nice theory but as it doesn't produce what we see and the limestone isn't concrete that idea died some decades ago. Beside being far more work the stones are very irregular meaning they would make individual specialized molds for each stone and huge waste of time.

So here are images of the great pyramid's stone work. Does it look like it was made from copied concrete blocks or 'use whatever is about?

basically crappy rocks, do you think they cast these?

top of the great pyramid every stone is different

top of Khafre's pyramid every stone is different

a reply to: Hanslune

To build a high powered laser you would use an obelisk shape. Egyptians knew that somehow. They have found the crystals they would have used for them. 3,000-Year-Old Nimrud Lens Could Re-Write The History Of Science(A. Sutherland) "Loupe of Sargon". And they weren’t used for glasses because Assyrian archaeologists say that the lens is of such low quality that it would have been a poor aid to vision.
Another mystery solved.

The Roman's greatly increased their knowledge of technology especially in what we would call engineering, incorporating a great deal of Greek knowledge into their methods. Leading to concrete, extensive use of bricks, vaults, arches and domes. Something the Egyptian had not done (they did have arches but few).

Ah yeh. More of your Ill-founded dismissal.
The AE were making 18 metre high columns from rose granite IN A SINGLE PIECE.
Romans didn’t/could not. Their ‘advanced’ columns were stacked in sections using central pins to hold it together.
The only solid one-piece columns of that size that you’ll find in Ancient Rome are the ones they stole from Egypt and took back home to decorate their city with.
a reply to: Hanslune

originally posted by: mcsnacks77
a reply to: Hanslune

To build a high powered laser you would use an obelisk shape.

If that were remotely true, industrial and military lasers would be obelisk-shaped, wouldn't they.

So now - link us to ANY laser shaped like an obelisk.

Harte

originally posted by: bluesfreak

The Roman's greatly increased their knowledge of technology especially in what we would call engineering, incorporating a great deal of Greek knowledge into their methods. Leading to concrete, extensive use of bricks, vaults, arches and domes. Something the Egyptian had not done (they did have arches but few).

Ah yeh. More of your Ill-founded dismissal.
The AE were making 18 metre high columns from rose granite IN A SINGLE PIECE.
Romans didn’t/could not. Their ‘advanced’ columns were stacked in sections using central pins to hold it together.
The only solid one-piece columns of that size that you’ll find in Ancient Rome are the ones they stole from Egypt and took back home to decorate their city with.
a reply to: Hanslune

Actually, a one-piece stone column represents a lower level of technology, not a higher one.

Harte

Actually, a one-piece stone column represents a lower level of technology, not a higher one

Really? At 18+ metres , I would disagree.
I suppose that’s why the Romans took some back home to use as the front columns for their great buildings . The superior empire wants to use primitive and inferior columns to add to their own design for their latest , biggest structures right in the heart of their capital.
It wasn’t because it was a staggering feat to do in rose granite, LOOKED incredible too, polished one piece , and beautifully circular?
For what reason, then, did the Romans want them, take them , and use them?
It was either out of reverence , or for Aesthetic reasons , or why go to the (considerable and remarkable ) trouble of getting them from Egypt to Rome without breaking them?
The AE had the capability , and the daring , to do it in one piece.

It’s the Romans ,then, who made it ‘simpler’ to make large columns by stacking sections on pins .
If the Romans were more advanced than the AE, had better, sometimes automated ways of cutting stone,
why didn’t they just make their own? Easy to do, being more ‘ primitive’ than their own design .
They could have just made their own giant columns, if that was what they required for their own design .
But they didn’t

Simply a different method , but ‘more advanced’ is just your opinion.

Ps- Parthenon columns in Greece are 10.43m in height , made in sections like the design the Romans used .
Why not use the ‘simpler ‘ method of one piece then , if it’s 8 metres smaller than an AE column . And not granite , either .
They had no choice but to stack sections , in my opinion .

a reply to: Harte

a reply to: Harte

A laser is created when electrons in the atoms in optical materials like glass, crystal, or gas absorb the energy from an electrical current or a light. That extra energy “excites” the electrons enough to move from a lower-energy orbit to a higher-energy orbit around the atom’s nucleus.

A basic laser, like a red ruby laser, consists of a rod made of ruby crystals with a mirror on each end, and a flash tube.

Laser beams start out as invisible infrared light and then pass through special optics that convert them to visible green light and then to invisible, high-energy ultraviolet light for optimum interaction with the target.

Laser beams can stay sharply focused over vast distances, even to the moon and back.

Source:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory • 7000 East Avenue • Livermore, CA 94550 Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration.

a reply to: Harte

Industrial and military use lasers that have a continuous beam. Crystal rods have a short pulse beam.

Mate, what’s your point here? Are you suggesting that the AE were firing lasers straight up into space from the obelisks? If not they’d need a set up of mirrors to re-direct the beam from the obelisks upright position.
If you’re suggesting they cut stone with laser, there is a whole load of reasons that might unfortunately change your mind in that. One is surface melting on the stone of a certain type when a laser has been used. It’s not been found on AE stone . What has been found are tooling marks , the type of which cause much debate on here..
What did the AE use lasers for, in your opinion?
And I’m honestly not saying this to you in a rude manner, I’m just interested in all hypotheses.
One thing is for sure, the AE had rubies .
Or are you saying that obelisks REPRESENT an object that produces a laser?
a reply to: mcsnacks77

a reply to: bluesfreak
To send a signal across the galaxy they would have needed these large structures so that enough energy could be harnessed to send a signal the distance they were trying to reach. And Using crystal for lasers would send out a signal like Morse code like an SOS signal. NASA picked up a signal like that coming from an unknown part of the universe.

a reply to: mcsnacks77

Or even to use it to send messages from one temple to another over certain distances. Like a Batman signal.
Considering time and energy had more value back then I don’t think they would build these massive structures for representation of objects. To put the time energy and money into these massive structures would have been to serve a use needed.

a reply to: mcsnacks77

Triangulum Universe.

a reply to: bluesfreak

Something did come to me. The Egyptians and cats. There was a type of signal used before the 1950’s called the cat-whisker diode. It’s simple contraption to build that receives radio signals thru Morse code.
That would turn the setup into a sort of full wave rectifier: the opposing coils could receive opposing magnetic fields (hence e/m waves), the diode elements would "force" the current in one direction. Assuming the central rod is connected at the bottom to the tips of the snakes in their hieroglyphics ,the current would always flow from the top of the rod to the bottom...

a reply to: mcsnacks77

The ankh would have been used as a Permanent Magnet Moving Coil (PMMC) meter – also known as a D’Arsonval meter or galvanometer – is an instrument that allows you to measure the current through a coil by observing the coil’s angular deflection in a uniform magnetic field.

A PMMC meter places a coil of wire (i.e. a conductor) inbetween two permanent magnets in order to create stationary magnetic field. According to Faraday’s Laws of electromagnetic induction, a current carrying conductor placed in a magnetic field will experience a force in the direction determined by Fleming’s left hand rule.
That’s why it was called the key to life/energy.

a reply to: mcsnacks77

The riddle of the Sphinx is different than the riddle of why crystal radio sets might defy thermodynamics.
That *debate* was dated primarily 1900-1910 when crystal radio technology was being evaluated for the purpose of replacing pulp fiction.

Drummond light was first imagined as a brilliant device for presenting a more accurate surveying target.
There is no evidence that the Egyptians had the technology to heat limestone to 4662 degrees Fahrenheit but they may have imagined something similar at the top of the Great pyramid for night illumination, replacing the capstone.

The number of possible connections you can make depend on the number of participants using the technology.
The simple math explained ((X/2) * (X-1)) for the divide and conquer tribute.

"If I let my thoughts roam I find #1. The best, after all, is death."

a reply to: fromunclexcommunicate

You don’t have to heat it up to do that. Haven’t you heard of Biolith? You start with recycled aggregate, the tiny bits of material that cement holds together in concrete. Then add a (safe) strain of bacteria, along with calcium, carbon, and nutrients. The combination jump-starts the creation of calcium carbonate, the “biocement” that acts like glue. Unlike traditional cement manufacturing, it works in ambient temperatures, without the need for high heat. It also cures in days, while traditional Portland cement takes weeks. The resulting product is also stronger than a traditional concrete block because of the way the material forms naturally.