Hillary Lost Popular Vote And More To Come

It's all starting to come together, bit by bit.

truepundit.com...

Pladuim

a reply to: okrian

Just to let you know, the person doing the intel dropping doesn't seem to like Bush.

originally posted by: Pladuim
It's all starting to come together, bit by bit.

truepundit.com...

Pladuim

Story out of time and late to the table, conspiracy value pretty much zilch...backgrounds already known, TP website untrustworthy and obviously biased anyway.

Another introduction Andrew C McCarthy.
www.nationalreview.com...

Here is what he has to say about the Grassley-Graham memo.
www.nationalreview.com...

Pladuim

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Get away with what? Haven't we already investigated her from here to hell and back and found nothing?

ROFLMAO...found nothing?... Claiming that "she didn't intend to do it" doesn't equal to nothing... Yet intent is never really an issue in ANY crime, and intent never really needs to be proven. This is why there are "involuntary manslaughter" charges, "involuntary trespass" charges etc, etc... Not to mention the fact that her claims that "she didn't know she was doing something illegal" is BS, because every person in government gets briefed and taught what not to do with classified information... Only the most ignorant of people believe all the claims about "she didn't intent to do it" or "she didn't know she was doing something illegal"...

originally posted by: Pladuim
a reply to: okrian

Just to let you know, the person doing the intel dropping doesn't seem to like Bush.

Speaking of Bush , both Sr. and Jr., I have to say I found it odd that they ,as Republicans, endorsed Hillary for president.

Anyone else wonder what that was all about ?

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

How about this..

Found nothing that ANY senator has been prosecuted for equal or lesser value..

It is just insane people think not prosecuting a senator for a procedural error for the first time in American history. Is biased..


Bias by definition is going against the status quo..


Prosecuting the first senator in history For not swapping servers when whatever memo came out to do so. would biased..

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Found nothing that ANY senator has been prosecuted for equal or lesser value.. 

Has any Senator ever been tried for murder?

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

Well the fbi is definitely biased against trump.. that why they announced a new hillary investigation a week before the election...

Ever hear of "Getting Ahead of a Story"?

With the Weiner laptop & NYPD involved ready to leak, internal forces in the FBI ready to pounce on him / leak, Comey may have been backed himself into such a corner that if he tried to cover it up at that stage he'd most definitely have been outed as corrupt POS. So he does a half arse wiggle move that actually only cost Hillary what a couple poll points, and covered his own butt like any smart DC professional would. As much as he already covered her ass for her to even make it past summer, whatever they were paying him there's no way it had been enough for the circus he got sucked into.

Also ever notice that the FBI never made any comments about the investigations in to Trump people during the election?

Doesnt this contradict your statements about him covering for Clinton and trying to hurt Trump?

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
a reply to: Pladuim

Hillary would go away FOREVER if you guys wouldn't keep bringing her up. Haven't you tired of her yet? I sure have.

untill hollywood drags out her carcass to read books on TV

originally posted by: LordAhriman
Yay... another LARPer... We needed this...

This. So much.

a reply to: Pyle

Doesnt this contradict your statements about him covering for Clinton and trying to hurt Trump?

Only if you ignore the situation. They were illegally spying on the trump campaign. You expect them to come out and say "Yup! We just thought we'd listen in on the private conversations of the candidate running against us. NBD guys." you're crazy.

There were many whispers, about trump-russia collusion throughout the campaign, not directly from the FBI, most famously from the clinton campaign and harry reid.

IMO, comey wanted to stay out of the election. That's why he exonerated hillary. Only when he was forced to admit to the weiner laptop's contents did he put his hands on the scales, and he took them off as soon as he possibly could, claiming they reviewed 40k emails in less than a week.

If they were illegally spying on the trump campaign why the hell didnt they use any info to ensure he didnt win? What was the damn point then?

No kidding there were whispers of Trump-Russia conspiracy. Putin and Russia were the only things in the world Trump wouldnt criticize during the election. There was the time he asked Russia to "find" Clinton emails. His campaign manager Manafort and his connections to Pro-Russian Ukrainian party were well known. His sons saying Russia makes a substantial amount of their business portfolio.

Its amazing how okay Trump supporters are okay with the NYPD and FBI NY field office forcing Comey to kill the Clinton presidency but are totally not okay with FBI investigating Page after he left the Trump campaign. Or how they are okay with the FBI starting a investigation into Clinton Foundation based on a political attack book Clinton Cash. But the Dossier is way out of bounds.

originally posted by: Sheye

originally posted by: Pladuim
a reply to: okrian

Just to let you know, the person doing the intel dropping doesn't seem to like Bush.

Speaking of Bush , both Sr. and Jr., I have to say I found it odd that they ,as Republicans, endorsed Hillary for president.

Anyone else wonder what that was all about ?

Because Hillary is in 'the club'.

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
a reply to: Pladuim

Hillary would go away FOREVER if you guys wouldn't keep bringing her up. Haven't you tired of her yet? I sure have.

False.

She would keep writing books about what really happened, get on every talk show and blame everyone but herself, and periscope to her "activist bitches."

She's like the clap, but you didn't get it the fun way.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Get away with what? Haven't we already investigated her from here to hell and back and found nothing?

Have you not read strozk and paiges actual texts, jesus christ man, they broke their own fbi rules hamded out immunity like candy, destroyed evidence, let clintons lawyer who was also a subject of the investigation sit in on her questioning, the list go on man the investigation was a whiyrwssh

a reply to: Pyle

If they were illegally spying on the trump campaign why the hell didnt they use any info to ensure he didnt win? What was the damn point then?

The same reason there have been no real Russia collusion charges despite spying for two years and investigating for almost a year. Tony blair and general rogers warned the trump team that they were being spied on, so even if they had done something wrong, they knew well enough to keep it out of the airwaves, phone lines, and emails.

There was the time he asked Russia to "find" Clinton emails.

LOL still going with that as evidence? It's pretty scant, I'll grant you that.

Or how they are okay with the FBI starting a investigation into Clinton Foundation based on a political attack book Clinton Cash. But the Dossier is way out of bounds.

Investigative reporting vs. fiction.

Why an anti-Clinton book from Breitbart got the FBI’s attention
This is really the current state of affairs in a nut shell. The right has been investigating, the left has creating hysterics.

Its amazing how okay Trump supporters are okay with the NYPD and FBI NY field office forcing Comey to kill the Clinton presidency but are totally not okay with FBI investigating Page after he left the Trump campaign.

Again, the facts bear out, clinton is corrupt. Page was witness for the FBI a couple months before joining the campaign. They lied on the FISA warrant and said he was probably a spy, despite using him to testify against russian spies. It's asinine.

a reply to: Pladuim

After studying this New World Order thing for more than a decade, I have to say it is amazing to see how things are unfolding.

A lot of Anon followers are cheering and celebrating and believing this is it but I’m cautious. They infiltrated our way of life for decades and decades. We may never be able to erase every trace of these traitors and controllers.

a reply to: Wide-Eyes

Because they’re all on the same team. Globalists are Dems and from the GOP and from England and Germany and Australia—-all stripes and colors and backgrounds.

See the bigger picture here!

a reply to: Pyle

You really need to start facing reality here because the truth is coming out and it doesn’t serve your life or your growth as a thinking person to keep denying the truth.

And stop with the two-party system devotion!

Globalists are all on the same team.