It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: gariac
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: gariac
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: gariac
a reply to: Caver78
So how do they know the altitude of the object? It isn't like the object has a transponder.
The altitude is displayed on screen, bottom left, reflecting twenty five thousand feet.
What it doesn't show is a clear profile, close ups, heading, or speed of pursuit aircraft.
That is the altitude of the f-18. How so they know the altitude of the target?
It 'appears' wings level. In the second video a slow turn remains level with the horizon, neither climbing nor descending. Would like to know the range too.
The video was at 40 miles IIRC.
www.spreaker.com...
The link is to a podcast version of a local Los Angeles radio show. He even mentions the old ATS post.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: butcherguy
I believe it did mention the speed of the headwind that the objects were flying against (was it 125 kt ?)
Not displayed on screen. Its the WO officers screen in the video, not the Pilots HUD.
The 'voices' report they are flying 'against' a 120 knot wind.
(I always go by what i can see)
The NYT video changed the subtitles to miles vs knots now.
Listening to the voice, I hear 'knots' , but the NYT says that he says 'miles'.
This is the first time that I've seen names associated with this sighting. Well, to my joy, I know one of the crewmembers. Like, I flew with him, deployed with him, I'm FB friends with his wife (for some reason, most of my buddies don't do FB, but their spouses do).
So I reached out to her about his and asked if her husband (my friend) saw this thing. She sent me his cell number and said I could call him about the "tic-tac"
I haven't called him yet, but here is his response:
"Hey Cosmania! something I'd really not thought about until a guy from OSD contacted me a few months ago. Then the Times contacted me to confirm XXXXX's story, so I told them what I could recall. The FLIR video they included is not from us, that was from a different flight, so I don't like that they attributed it to us.
Frankly, when I got back to the ship for my CVIC debrief, I asked them if there was a sub in the area doing cruise missile launch tests, since that seemed like the most plausible explanation I could come up with. I told OSD & the Times reporter that, too.
Anyway, didn't think it would be such a huge deal, just told them what I remembered."
www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: butcherguy
I believe it did mention the speed of the headwind that the objects were flying against (was it 125 kt ?)
Not displayed on screen. Its the WO officers screen in the video, not the Pilots HUD.
The 'voices' report they are flying 'against' a 120 knot wind.
(I always go by what i can see)
The NYT video changed the subtitles to miles vs knots now.
Listening to the voice, I hear 'knots' , but the NYT says that he says 'miles'.
Proper is knots... its the Navy. I hear "miles", so will you...Whoops.
originally posted by: penroc3
a reply to: FredT
did anyone watch the Saudi Arabia video about the Houthi missiles and drone. Very glad to see some common sense went into that video.
but as to the OP video i think it is probably just a drone that got lost from its pack but still a neat video
I suppose what is lost in the reporting is that the pilots never had a visual on the object. All we have is output from electro optics. Instrumentation isn't infallible. High speed movement can also be due to some servo motor artifact. What would help here is to have "video" from both planes. The odds of two FLIRs malfunctioning would be small. Remember seti was fooled by a microwave oven.