It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: underwerks
well the op is not about americans
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: JinMI
I just want people to remember that Trump won't be president forever, and when the opposition is in power again, guess who's names go on those lists?
It's wrong to support listing citizens no matter which political aisle you sit on, because those same lists will eventually be used against everybody.
Trump supporters included.
So let terrorist into your country? Incase 1 day you become one?
That makes no sense to people who do not have radical beliefs and want to stomp out terrorism 9nce and for all.
Nowhere in anything I wrote was I talking about letting terrorists into the country. I'm talking about domestic lists of citizens that the government classifies as threats.
If I have to give up safety for more freedom, so be it.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: underwerks
other groups outside the us that want in that are a threat
that is how i read it which is inline with the op
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: JinMI
I just want people to remember that Trump won't be president forever, and when the opposition is in power again, guess who's names go on those lists?
It's wrong to support listing citizens no matter which political aisle you sit on, because those same lists will eventually be used against everybody.
Trump supporters included.
So let terrorist into your country? Incase 1 day you become one?
That makes no sense to people who do not have radical beliefs and want to stomp out terrorism 9nce and for all.
Nowhere in anything I wrote was I talking about letting terrorists into the country. I'm talking about domestic lists of citizens that the government classifies as threats.
If I have to give up safety for more freedom, so be it.
I don't think anywhere in Trump's order did he mention a domestic list of citizens. He was talking about citizens of countries were there is an insane amount of senseless violence by religious extremists.
What's wrong with that?
Secretary of State nominee Rex Tillerson did not rule out the possibility of a Muslim registry during his confirmation hearing earlier this month, but clarified that if established, it would also extend "to other groups" that are threats to the U.S.
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: JinMI
I just want people to remember that Trump won't be president forever, and when the opposition is in power again, guess who's names go on those lists?
It's wrong to support listing citizens no matter which political aisle you sit on, because those same lists will eventually be used against everybody.
Trump supporters included.
So let terrorist into your country? Incase 1 day you become one?
That makes no sense to people who do not have radical beliefs and want to stomp out terrorism 9nce and for all.
Nowhere in anything I wrote was I talking about letting terrorists into the country. I'm talking about domestic lists of citizens that the government classifies as threats.
If I have to give up safety for more freedom, so be it.
I don't think anywhere in Trump's order did he mention a domestic list of citizens. He was talking about citizens of countries were there is an insane amount of senseless violence by religious extremists.
What's wrong with that?
You're right, he didn't. Rex Tillerson did. From my post on the first page:
Secretary of State nominee Rex Tillerson did not rule out the possibility of a Muslim registry during his confirmation hearing earlier this month, but clarified that if established, it would also extend "to other groups" that are threats to the U.S.
The registry will also extend to "other groups" that the Trump admin classifies as threats. I think a registry of Americans is wrong.
And while you might gloss over that part because you're happy about what you see as Trump being tough on immigration, that's the part that will continue to effect Americans, long after Trump is out of office.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: underwerks
and monkeys might fly out of my butt
they were not talking about us citizens
spin it however you like
i want immigration from countries that we cant vet stopped until a way is found to vet them
trump campaigned on this and is following through
good for him
White House spokesman Sean Spicer said on Tuesday that the State and Homeland Security Departments would work on the vetting process once Trump's nominee to head the State Department, Rex Tillerson, is installed.
Secretary of State nominee Rex Tillerson did not rule out the possibility of a Muslim registry during his confirmation hearing earlier this month, but clarified that if established, it would also extend "to other groups" that are threats to the U.S.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Snarl
and all those dems said he wouldnt follow through with his campaign promises
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Snarl
and all those dems said he wouldnt follow through with his campaign promises